Literature DB >> 22875736

Impact of intracoronary cell therapy on left ventricular function in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials.

Ronak Delewi1, Anouk Andriessen, Jan G P Tijssen, Felix Zijlstra, Jan J Piek, Alexander Hirsch.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Numerous randomized controlled studies assessing intracoronary bone marrow cell therapy (BMC) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been performed.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effect of autologous BMC therapy on left ventricular function by performing an up to date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including long-term follow-up. DATA SOURCES: Trials were indentified through a literature search from 1980 to June 2012 of the Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane database, and the Current Controlled Trials Register. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials comparing intracoronary BMC infusion to control as treatment for AMI. DATA EXTRACTION: The primary endpoint was the change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) from baseline to follow-up. Secondary endpoints were changes in left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV), infarct size and clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: Improvement of LVEF in patients receiving intracoronary BMC was significantly better within 6 months (23 studies, 2.23% (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 3.47); p<0.001). At 12 months of follow-up, this effect sustained with 3.91% more LVEF improvement (11 studies, (95% CI 2.56 to 5.27), p<0.001). At long-term follow-up, we found a trend for better LVEF improvement in favor of cell therapy (7 studies, 1.90% (95% CI -0.43 to 4.23); p=0.11). There was no clear effect in infarct size or LVEDV. However, we found a significant reduction in LVESV at 6 months (-4.81 ml (95% CI -7.86 to -1.76); p<0.001 and at 12 months (-9.41 ml (95% CI -13.64 to -5.17); p<0.001). Moreover, there was a statistically significant decrease in recurrent AMI (Relative Risk (RR) 0.44 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.79); p=0.007), and readmission for heart failure, unstable angina or chest pain (RR 0.59 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.98); p=0.04) in favour of cell therapy.
CONCLUSION: Intracoronary BMC treatment leads to a moderate improvement of LVEF and reduction of LVESV at 6 months that sustained at 12 months follow-up, without a clear significant effect on LVEDV, or infarct size. Furthermore, we found that intracoronary cell therapy is significantly associated with a reduction in recurrent AMI and readmission for heart failure, unstable angina or chest pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22875736     DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  28 in total

1.  The effect of encapsulation of cardiac stem cells within matrix-enriched hydrogel capsules on cell survival, post-ischemic cell retention and cardiac function.

Authors:  Audrey E Mayfield; Everad L Tilokee; Nicholas Latham; Brian McNeill; Bu-Khanh Lam; Marc Ruel; Erik J Suuronen; David W Courtman; Duncan J Stewart; Darryl R Davis
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Use of stem cells in heart failure treatment: where we stand and where we are going.

Authors:  Luis A Sánchez; Carlos Enrique Guerrero-Beltrán; Andrea M Cordero-Reyes; Gerardo García-Rivas; Guillermo Torre-Amione
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

Review 3.  A reappraisal of the role of circulating (progenitor) cells in the pathobiology of diabetic complications.

Authors:  G P Fadini
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 4.  New vessel formation in the context of cardiomyocyte regeneration--the role and importance of an adequate perfusing vasculature.

Authors:  Katherine C Michelis; Manfred Boehm; Jason C Kovacic
Journal:  Stem Cell Res       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.020

Review 5.  Top 10 cardiovascular therapies and interventions for the next decade.

Authors:  Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 6.  Vascular precursor cells in tissue injury repair.

Authors:  Xin Shi; Weihong Zhang; Liya Yin; William M Chilian; Jessica Krieger; Ping Zhang
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 7.012

7.  Cell therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction: ACCRUEd evidence to date.

Authors:  Jason C Kovacic; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Overexpression of FABP3 inhibits human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cell proliferation but enhances their survival in hypoxia.

Authors:  Suna Wang; Yifu Zhou; Oleg Andreyev; Robert F Hoyt; Avneesh Singh; Timothy Hunt; Keith A Horvath
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.905

9.  Effect of the stop-flow technique on cardiac retention of c-kit positive human cardiac stem cells after intracoronary infusion in a porcine model of chronic ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Matthew C L Keith; Yukichi Tokita; Xian-Liang Tang; Shahab Ghafghazi; Joseph B Moore; Kyung U Hong; Julius B Elmore; Alok R Amraotkar; Haixun Guo; Brian L Ganzel; Kendra J Grubb; Michael P Flaherty; Bathri N Vajravelu; Marcin Wysoczynski; Roberto Bolli
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 17.165

10.  Spatial profiles of electrical mismatch determine vulnerability to conduction failure across a host-donor cell interface.

Authors:  Robert D Kirkton; Nima Badie; Nenad Bursac
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.