Literature DB >> 22875734

[Do advers health effects of chrysotile and amphibole asbestos differ?].

X Baur1, J Schneider, H-J Woitowitz, M Velasco Garrido.   

Abstract

Due to the current query whether the predominantly used chrysotile (white) asbestos comprises health risks we performed a literature search including in vitro and animal experiments as well as epidemiological studies.As shown by epidemiological studies chrysotile causes less pleural fibrosis and mesotheliomas when compared with other asbestos types. However, its otherwise inflammatory, toxic, carcinogenic, and fibrosis-inducing effects correspond to those of other occupationally relevant asbestos types. This is based on clinical, animal as well as on in-vitro findings. This means that denying a causal relationship, e. g. in a case with lung fibrosis (= asbestosis) or lung cancer with an asbestos load of 25 fiber-years in the absence of identification of a significant concentration of asbestos fibers or asbestos bodies in the lung (see so-called "hit and run" phenomenon), contradicts the medical-scientific knowledge. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22875734     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1309980

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pneumologie        ISSN: 0934-8387


  2 in total

1.  How conflicted authors undermine the World Health Organization (WHO) campaign to stop all use of asbestos: spotlight on studies showing that chrysotile is carcinogenic and facilitates other non-cancer asbestos-related diseases.

Authors:  Xaver Baur; Colin L Soskolne; Richard A Lemen; Joachim Schneider; Hans-Joachim Woitowitz; Lygia Therese Budnik
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2015-03-02

2.  Ongoing downplaying of the carcinogenicity of chrysotile asbestos by vested interests.

Authors:  Xaver Baur; Arthur L Frank
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.646

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.