OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a modified sequence method with delayed time series for baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) estimation during supine position and orthostatism in healthy human beings. METHODS: Nineteen clinically healthy volunteers (12 men, age 28.4 ± 6.2 years old) were included. Blood pressure recordings were obtained during supine position and orthostatism (15 min each) with a Finometer. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and inter beat intervals (IBI) measured from all heartbeats were used to estimate BRS in both positive and negative sequences, with SBP delayed between 0 and 5 heartbeats. BRS estimations were compared by ANOVA, p < 0.05 was considered significant. Optimal recording time based on fixed BRS error estimation was calculated for each time series. RESULTS: BRS estimation was similar between positive and negative sequences in all conditions (BRS = 12.0 ± 2.0 ms/mmHg in supine position, delay 0). BRS with no delay was similar to BRS with delays between 1 and 5 heartbeats. Compared to supine position, BRS was smaller in orthostatism in all delays (BRS = 8.0 ± 2.0 ms/mmHg with delay 0). The shortest optimal recording time with delayed time series was similar in supine position and orthostatism (4.3 ± 1.7 vs. 3.74 ± 0.07 min, respectively). Estimation error was linearly correlated to IBI, regardless of the delay. CONCLUSION: BRS estimation with sequence method improves with delayed time series, during supine position and orthostatism. Reduced BRS estimation error and recording time from this method could benefit studies with large populations or patients with low tolerance to orthostatism.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a modified sequence method with delayed time series for baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) estimation during supine position and orthostatism in healthy human beings. METHODS: Nineteen clinically healthy volunteers (12 men, age 28.4 ± 6.2 years old) were included. Blood pressure recordings were obtained during supine position and orthostatism (15 min each) with a Finometer. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) and inter beat intervals (IBI) measured from all heartbeats were used to estimate BRS in both positive and negative sequences, with SBP delayed between 0 and 5 heartbeats. BRS estimations were compared by ANOVA, p < 0.05 was considered significant. Optimal recording time based on fixed BRS error estimation was calculated for each time series. RESULTS: BRS estimation was similar between positive and negative sequences in all conditions (BRS = 12.0 ± 2.0 ms/mmHg in supine position, delay 0). BRS with no delay was similar to BRS with delays between 1 and 5 heartbeats. Compared to supine position, BRS was smaller in orthostatism in all delays (BRS = 8.0 ± 2.0 ms/mmHg with delay 0). The shortest optimal recording time with delayed time series was similar in supine position and orthostatism (4.3 ± 1.7 vs. 3.74 ± 0.07 min, respectively). Estimation error was linearly correlated to IBI, regardless of the delay. CONCLUSION: BRS estimation with sequence method improves with delayed time series, during supine position and orthostatism. Reduced BRS estimation error and recording time from this method could benefit studies with large populations or patients with low tolerance to orthostatism.
Authors: Dominique Laude; Jean-Luc Elghozi; Arlette Girard; Elisabeth Bellard; Malika Bouhaddi; Paolo Castiglioni; Catherine Cerutti; Andrei Cividjian; Marco Di Rienzo; Jacques-Olivier Fortrat; Ben Janssen; John M Karemaker; Georges Lefthériotis; Gianfranco Parati; Pontus B Persson; Alberto Porta; Luc Quintin; Jacques Regnard; Heinz Rüdiger; Harald M Stauss Journal: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol Date: 2003-09-18 Impact factor: 3.619
Authors: S Carrasco-Sosa; M J Gaitán-González; R González-Camarena; Oscar Yáñez-Suárez Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2005-10-27 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: M V Pitzalis; F Mastropasqua; A Passantino; F Massari; L Ligurgo; C Forleo; C Balducci; F Lombardi; P Rizzon Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-04-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Lindsay J Chesterton; Nicholas M Selby; James O Burton; Jana Fialova; Cian Chan; Chris W McIntyre Journal: Hemodial Int Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 1.812
Authors: G A M Galdino; S C G Moura-Tonello; S N Linares; J C Milan-Mattos; D L Spavieri; S M Oliveira; A Porta; T Beltrame; A M Catai Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res Date: 2022-09-12 Impact factor: 2.904