Literature DB >> 22875414

Ovarian cancer surgery: health and coping during the perioperative period.

Lene Seibaek1, Jan Blaakaer, Lone Kjeld Petersen, Lise Hounsgaard.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The study objective was to survey general health and coping in women undergoing ovarian cancer surgery, and subsequently to develop and test a supportive care intervention. METHODS/MATERIALS: Women who underwent surgery on the suspicion of ovarian cancer participated in a follow-up questionnaire study in which the Short Form-36 Questionnaire was used to survey general health twice during the perioperative period and the Life Orientation Questionnaire (SOC) was used once to define the postoperative coping capacity. An evidence-based, preoperative supportive care programme was subsequently developed and tested. This consisted of lean methodology applied to clinical pathways, preoperative optimisation, and psychosocial care and support.
RESULTS: From 294 women allocated to three study groups, a total of 546 Short Form-36 questionnaires and 253 SOC questionnaires were available for analysis. The overall response rate was 86 %. The presence of ascites, a pelvic mass, and a Risk of Malignancy Index >200 proved to be appropriate clinical markers for intensified preoperative care. Concerning physical health, levels were low throughout the perioperative period; the majority however stayed within standard levels. Concerning mental health, levels were below standard during the entire period, but did improve with time, also in women in whom the potential cancer diagnosis was refuted. The preoperative differences between these groups leveled out postoperatively in terms of physical health. At the end of the perioperative period, the coping capacity was close to normal.
CONCLUSIONS: A need for supportive care during the perioperative period was identified. This should be adjusted to the nature of the disease and the extent of the treatment. Participation in a preoperative supportive programme supported physical health during the perioperative period; however, further support of mental health seemed required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22875414     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-012-1556-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  21 in total

Review 1.  Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: a systematic review.

Authors:  Monica Eriksson; Bengt Lindström
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  The effect of accelerated rehabilitation on recovery after surgery for ovarian malignancy.

Authors:  Charlotte Marx; Tina Rasmussen; Dorthe Hjort Jakobsen; Christian Ottosen; Lene Lundvall; Bent Ottesen; Torben Callesen; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  [Salutogenic model and utilization of the KASAM form (Sense of Coherence) in nursing research--a methodological report].

Authors:  A Langius; H Björvell
Journal:  Vard Nord Utveckl Forsk       Date:  1996

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Survival of ovarian cancer patients in Denmark: excess mortality risk analysis of five-year relative survival in the period 1978-2002.

Authors:  Charlotte Gerd Hannibal; Rikke Cortes; Gerda Engholm; Susanne Krüger Kjaer
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  After colonic surgery: The lived experience of participating in a fast-track programme.

Authors:  Annelise Norlyk; Ingegerd Harder
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2009-09-01

7.  Effects of a nursing intervention on quality of life outcomes in post-surgical women with gynecological cancers.

Authors:  Ruth McCorkle; Michael Dowd; Elizabeth Ercolano; Dena Schulman-Green; Anna-leila Williams; Mary Lou Siefert; Jeanne Steiner; Peter Schwartz
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 8.  Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet; Douglas W Wilmore
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Follow-up for people with cancer: nurse-led services and telephone interventions.

Authors:  Karen Cox; Eleanor Wilson
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.187

10.  The impact of comorbidity and stage on ovarian cancer mortality: a nationwide Danish cohort study.

Authors:  Mette S Tetsche; Claus Dethlefsen; Lars Pedersen; Henrik T Sorensen; Mette Norgaard
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  2 in total

1.  Coping strategies, trajectories, and their associations with patient-reported outcomes among women with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Vanessa L Beesley; David D Smith; Christina M Nagle; Michael Friedlander; Peter Grant; Anna DeFazio; Penelope M Webb
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Prehabilitation to Improve Outcomes of Patients with Gynaecological Cancer: A New Window of Opportunity?

Authors:  Joëlle Dhanis; Nathaniel Keidan; Dominic Blake; Stuart Rundle; Dieuwke Strijker; Maaike van Ham; Johanna M A Pijnenborg; Anke Smits
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 6.575

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.