Literature DB >> 22874078

The index of microcirculatory resistance predicts myocardial infarction related to percutaneous coronary intervention.

Martin K C Ng1, Andy S C Yong, Michael Ho, Maulik G Shah, Chirapan Chawantanpipat, Rachel O'Connell, Anthony Keech, Leonard Kritharides, William F Fearon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) occurs in a significant proportion of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and portends poor outcomes. Currently, no clinically applicable method predicts periprocedural MI in the cardiac catheterization laboratory before it occurs. We hypothesized that impaired baseline coronary microcirculatory reserve, which reduces the ability to tolerate ischemic insults, is a risk for periprocedural MI and that the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) measured during PCI can predict occurrence of periprocedural MI. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Consecutive patients undergoing elective PCI of a single lesion in the left anterior descending coronary artery were recruited. A pressure-temperature sensor wire was used to measure IMR before PCI. Of the 50 patients studied, 10 had periprocedural MI. From binary logistic regression analyses of all clinical, procedural, and physiological parameters, univariable predictors of periprocedural MI were pre-PCI IMR (P=0.003) and the number of stents used (P=0.039). Pre-PCI IMR was the only independent predictor in bivariable regression analyses performed by adjusting for each available covariate one at a time (all P≤0.02). Pre-PCI IMR ≥27 U had 80.0% sensitivity and 85.0% specificity for predicting periprocedural MI (C statistic, 0.80; P=0.003). Pre-PCI IMR ≥27 U was independently associated with a 23-fold risk of developing periprocedural MI (odds ratio, 22.7; 95% CI, 3.8-133.9).
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the status of the coronary microcirculation plays a role in determining susceptibility toward periprocedural MI at the time of elective PCI. The IMR can predict subsequent risk of developing myocardial necrosis and may guide adjunctive prevention strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22874078     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.969048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1941-7640            Impact factor:   6.546


  18 in total

Review 1.  Coronary physiology assessment in the catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Felipe Díez-Delhoyo; Enrique Gutiérrez-Ibañes; Gerard Loughlin; Ricardo Sanz-Ruiz; María Eugenia Vázquez-Álvarez; Fernando Sarnago-Cebada; Rocío Angulo-Llanos; Ana Casado-Plasencia; Jaime Elízaga; Francisco Fernández Avilés Diáz
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-26

Review 2.  Coronary microvascular dysfunction: mechanisms and functional assessment.

Authors:  Paolo G Camici; Giulia d'Amati; Ornella Rimoldi
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 32.419

3.  Catheter-based functional metrics of the coronary circulation.

Authors:  Panagiotis Xaplanteris; Emanuele Barbato; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Role of coronary physiology in the contemporary management of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Neil Ruparelia; Rajesh K Kharbanda
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 5.  Current developments and future applications of intracoronary hemodynamics.

Authors:  Edward Coverstone; Robert Shapiro; Jasvindar Singh
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.439

6.  Index of microcirculatory resistance: state-of-the-art and potential applications in computational simulation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Yingyi Geng; Xintong Wu; Haipeng Liu; Dingchang Zheng; Ling Xia
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.066

7.  Microcirculatory significance of periprocedural myocardial necrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention assessed by the index of microcirculatory resistance.

Authors:  Zhiming Wu; Fei Ye; Wei You; Junjie Zhang; Dujiang Xie; Shaoliang Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Impact of an endothelial progenitor cell capturing stent on coronary microvascular function: comparison with drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Woong Gil Choi; Soo Hyun Kim; Hyung Seok Yoon; Eun Joo Lee; Dong Woon Kim
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.884

Review 9.  Impact of Targeted Therapies for Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction as Assessed by the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance.

Authors:  James Xu; Sidney Lo; Craig P Juergens; Dominic Y Leung
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 10.  Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease: Focus on Fractional Flow Reserve.

Authors:  Doyeon Hwang; Joo Myung Lee; Bon-Kwon Koo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.