Literature DB >> 22873691

A novel scale to assess resistance-exercise effort.

Daniel A Hackett1, Nathan A Johnson, Mark Halaki, Chin-Moi Chow.   

Abstract

In this study, we examined the validity of a novel subjective scale for assessing resistance-exercise effort. Seventeen male bodybuilders performed five sets of 10 repetitions at 70% of one-repetition maximum, for the bench press and squat. At the completion of each set, participants quantified their effort via the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and novel estimated-repetitions-to-failure scales, and continued repetitions to volitional exhaustion to determine actual-repetitions-to-failure. There were high correlations between estimated- and actual-repetitions-to-failure across sets for the bench press and squat (r ≥ 0.93; P < 0.05). During sets 3, 4, and 5, estimated-repetitions-to-failure predicted the number of repetitions to failure for the bench press and squat, as indicated by smaller effect sizes for differences (ES = 0.37-0.0). The estimated-repetitions-to-failure scale was reliable as indicated by high intraclass correlation coefficients (≥0.92) and narrow 95% limits of agreement (≤0.63 repetitions) for both the bench press and squat. Despite high correlations between RPE and actual-repetitions-to-failure (P < 0.05), RPE at volitional fatigue was less than maximal for both exercises. Our results suggest that the estimated-repetitions-to-failure scale is valid for predicting onset of muscular failure, and can be used for the assessment and prescription of resistance exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22873691     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2012.710757

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  17 in total

Review 1.  Rating of Perceived Effort: Methodological Concerns and Future Directions.

Authors:  Israel Halperin; Aviv Emanuel
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Accuracy in Predicting Repetitions to Task Failure in Resistance Exercise: A Scoping Review and Exploratory Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Israel Halperin; Tomer Malleron; Itai Har-Nir; Patroklos Androulakis-Korakakis; Milo Wolf; James Fisher; James Steele
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Exploring the acute affective responses to resistance training: A comparison of the predetermined and the estimated repetitions to failure approaches.

Authors:  Hadar Schwartz; Aviv Emanuel; Isaac Isur Rozen Samukas; Israel Halperin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Methods for Controlling and Reporting Resistance Training Proximity to Failure: Current Issues and Future Directions.

Authors:  Joshua C Pelland; Zac P Robinson; Jacob F Remmert; Rebecca M Cerminaro; Brian Benitez; Thomas A John; Eric R Helms; Michael C Zourdos
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-05       Impact factor: 11.928

Review 5.  Training for Muscular Strength: Methods for Monitoring and Adjusting Training Intensity.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Sophia Nimphius; Christopher R Bellon; W Guy Hornsby; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 11.928

6.  Strength Gains as a Result of Brief, Infrequent Resistance Exercise in Older Adults.

Authors:  James Fisher; James Steele; Pat McKinnon; Stephen McKinnon
Journal:  J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp)       Date:  2014-09-30

7.  A comparison of low volume 'high-intensity-training' and high volume traditional resistance training methods on muscular performance, body composition, and subjective assessments of training.

Authors:  J Giessing; B Eichmann; J Steele; J Fisher
Journal:  Biol Sport       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.806

8.  Application of the Repetitions in Reserve-Based Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale for Resistance Training.

Authors:  Eric R Helms; John Cronin; Adam Storey; Michael C Zourdos
Journal:  Strength Cond J       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  RPE vs. Percentage 1RM Loading in Periodized Programs Matched for Sets and Repetitions.

Authors:  Eric R Helms; Ryan K Byrnes; Daniel M Cooke; Michael H Haischer; Joseph P Carzoli; Trevor K Johnson; Matthew R Cross; John B Cronin; Adam G Storey; Michael C Zourdos
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Ability to predict repetitions to momentary failure is not perfectly accurate, though improves with resistance training experience.

Authors:  James Steele; Andreas Endres; James Fisher; Paulo Gentil; Jürgen Giessing
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.