OBJECTIVE: To investigate pregnancy outcomes, particularly cesarean delivery (CD), among women with "isolated" obesity (i.e. without additional comorbidities). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective population-based study between the years 1988-2010. The pregnancy outcomes of obese (prepregnancy BMI ≥30 kg/m(2)) and nonobese patients were compared. Patients with chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes mellitus, other preexisting chronic morbidities, multiple gestations, age above 40 years, grand multiparity (above 5 deliveries), lack of prenatal care, and following fertility treatments were excluded from the analysis. Stratified analyses, using multiple logistic regression models, were performed to control for confounders. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 173,628 deliveries met the inclusion criteria; 1605 (0.9%) occurred in patients with "isolated" obesity. Higher rates of CD were found among patients with "isolated" obesity (30.7% vs. 12.3%; odds ration [OR] = 3.2; p < 0.001). When controlling for possible confounders, using a multivariable model with CD as the outcome variable, the association between "isolated" obesity and CD remained significant (adjusted OR = 2.6; p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the risks of perinatal complications including perinatal mortality, shoulder dystocia, congenital malformations, and low 5-min Apgar score. CONCLUSION: "Isolated" obesity, although not a risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes, is an independent risk factor for CD.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate pregnancy outcomes, particularly cesarean delivery (CD), among women with "isolated" obesity (i.e. without additional comorbidities). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective population-based study between the years 1988-2010. The pregnancy outcomes of obese (prepregnancy BMI ≥30 kg/m(2)) and nonobese patients were compared. Patients with chronic hypertension, pregestational diabetes mellitus, other preexisting chronic morbidities, multiple gestations, age above 40 years, grand multiparity (above 5 deliveries), lack of prenatal care, and following fertility treatments were excluded from the analysis. Stratified analyses, using multiple logistic regression models, were performed to control for confounders. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 173,628 deliveries met the inclusion criteria; 1605 (0.9%) occurred in patients with "isolated" obesity. Higher rates of CD were found among patients with "isolated" obesity (30.7% vs. 12.3%; odds ration [OR] = 3.2; p < 0.001). When controlling for possible confounders, using a multivariable model with CD as the outcome variable, the association between "isolated" obesity and CD remained significant (adjusted OR = 2.6; p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the risks of perinatal complications including perinatal mortality, shoulder dystocia, congenital malformations, and low 5-min Apgar score. CONCLUSION: "Isolated" obesity, although not a risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes, is an independent risk factor for CD.
Authors: Antonina I Frolova; Judy J Wang; Shayna N Conner; Methodius G Tuuli; George A Macones; Candice L Woolfolk; Alison G Cahill Journal: Am J Perinatol Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Ingvild Hersoug Nedberg; Charlotta Rylander; Finn Egil Skjeldestad; Ellen Blix; Tamar Ugulava; Erik Eik Anda Journal: J Epidemiol Glob Health Date: 2020-08-21