Literature DB >> 22872601

Lung, liver and lymph node metastases in follow-up MSCT: comprehensive volumetric assessment of lesion size changes.

A M Wulff1, H Bolte, S Fischer, S Freitag-Wolf, G Soza, C Tietjen, J Biederer, M Heller, M Fabel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate measurement accuracy in terms of precision and inter-rater variability in the simultaneous volumetric assessment of lung, liver and lymph node metastasis size change over time in comparison to RECIST 1.1.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three independent readers evaluated multislice CT data from clinical follow-up studies (chest/abdomen) in 50 patients with metastases. A total of 117 lung, 77 liver and 97 lymph node metastases were assessed manually (RECIST 1.1) and by volumetry with semi-automated software. The quality of segmentation and need for manual adjustments were recorded. Volumes were converted to effective diameters to allow comparison to RECIST. For statistical assessment of precision and interobserver agreement, the Wilcoxon-signed rank test and Bland-Altman plots were utilized.
RESULTS: The quality of segmentation after manual correction was acceptable to excellent in 95 % of lesions and manual corrections were applied in 21 - 36 % of all lesions, most predominantly in lymph nodes. Mean precision was 2.6 - 6.3 % (manual) with 0.2 - 1.5 % (effective) relative measurement deviation (p <.001). Inter-reader median variation coefficients ranged from 9.4 - 12.8 % (manual) and 2.9 - 8.2 % (volumetric) for different lesion types (p < .001). The limits of agreement were ± 9.8 to ± 11.2 % for volumetric assessment.
CONCLUSION: Superior precision and inter-rater variability of volumetric over manual measurement of lesion change over time was demonstrated in a whole body setting. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22872601     DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1312860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of manual and semi-automatic measuring techniques in MSCT scans of patients with lymphoma: a multicentre study.

Authors:  A J Höink; J Weßling; R Koch; C Schülke; N Kohlhase; L Wassenaar; R M Mesters; M D'Anastasi; M Fabel; A Wulff; D Pinto dos Santos; A Kießling; A Graser; V Dicken; M Karpitschka; L Bornemann; W Heindel; B Buerke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-06       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  [Automatic segmentation and annotation in radiology].

Authors:  P Dankerl; A Cavallaro; M Uder; M Hammon
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Semi-automatic 3D-volumetry of liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors to improve combination therapy with 177Lu-DOTATOC and 90Y-DOTATOC.

Authors:  Matthaeus Cieciera; Clemens Kratochwil; Jan Moltz; Hans Ulrich Kauczor; Tim Holland Letz; Peter Choyke; Walter Mier; Uwe Haberkorn; Frederik L Giesel
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

4.  Towards volumetric thresholds in RECIST 1.1: Therapeutic response assessment in hepatic metastases.

Authors:  Katharina S Winter; Felix O Hofmann; Kolja M Thierfelder; Julian W Holch; Nina Hesse; Alena B Baumann; Dominik P Modest; Sebastian Stintzing; Volker Heinemann; Jens Ricke; Wieland H Sommer; Melvin D'Anastasi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Improved image quality of low-dose CT combining with iterative model reconstruction algorithm for response assessment in patients after treatment of malignant tumor.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Xin; Jingtao Shen; Shangwen Yang; Song Liu; Anning Hu; Bin Zhu; Yan Jiang; Baoxin Li; Bing Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-08

6.  Low-dose whole-body CT using deep learning image reconstruction: image quality and lesion detection.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Noda; Tetsuro Kaga; Nobuyuki Kawai; Toshiharu Miyoshi; Hiroshi Kawada; Fuminori Hyodo; Avinash Kambadakone; Masayuki Matsuo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 3.039

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.