Literature DB >> 22872144

Three-dimensional cell culture model for measuring the effects of interstitial fluid flow on tumor cell invasion.

Alimatou M Tchafa1, Arpit D Shah, Shafei Wang, Melissa T Duong, Adrian C Shieh.   

Abstract

The growth and progression of most solid tumors depend on the initial transformation of the cancer cells and their response to stroma-associated signaling in the tumor microenvironment (1). Previously, research on the tumor microenvironment has focused primarily on tumor-stromal interactions (1-2). However, the tumor microenvironment also includes a variety of biophysical forces, whose effects remain poorly understood. These forces are biomechanical consequences of tumor growth that lead to changes in gene expression, cell division, differentiation and invasion(3). Matrix density (4), stiffness (5-6), and structure (6-7), interstitial fluid pressure (8), and interstitial fluid flow (8) are all altered during cancer progression. Interstitial fluid flow in particular is higher in tumors compared to normal tissues (8-10). The estimated interstitial fluid flow velocities were measured and found to be in the range of 0.1-3 μm s(-1), depending on tumor size and differentiation (9, 11). This is due to elevated interstitial fluid pressure caused by tumor-induced angiogenesis and increased vascular permeability (12). Interstitial fluid flow has been shown to increase invasion of cancer cells (13-14), vascular fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells (15). This invasion may be due to autologous chemotactic gradients created around cells in 3-D (16) or increased matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) expression (15), chemokine secretion and cell adhesion molecule expression (17). However, the mechanism by which cells sense fluid flow is not well understood. In addition to altering tumor cell behavior, interstitial fluid flow modulates the activity of other cells in the tumor microenvironment. It is associated with (a) driving differentiation of fibroblasts into tumor-promoting myofibroblasts (18), (b) transporting of antigens and other soluble factors to lymph nodes (19), and (c) modulating lymphatic endothelial cell morphogenesis (20). The technique presented here imposes interstitial fluid flow on cells in vitro and quantifies its effects on invasion (Figure 1). This method has been published in multiple studies to measure the effects of fluid flow on stromal and cancer cell invasion (13-15, 17). By changing the matrix composition, cell type, and cell concentration, this method can be applied to other diseases and physiological systems to study the effects of interstitial flow on cellular processes such as invasion, differentiation, proliferation, and gene expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22872144      PMCID: PMC3476398          DOI: 10.3791/4159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  24 in total

1.  Synergy between interstitial flow and VEGF directs capillary morphogenesis in vitro through a gradient amplification mechanism.

Authors:  Cara-Lynn E Helm; Mark E Fleury; Andreas H Zisch; Federica Boschetti; Melody A Swartz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Autologous morphogen gradients by subtle interstitial flow and matrix interactions.

Authors:  Mark E Fleury; Kendrick C Boardman; Melody A Swartz
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-04-07       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification.

Authors:  Adam J Engler; Shamik Sen; H Lee Sweeney; Dennis E Discher
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Autologous chemotaxis as a mechanism of tumor cell homing to lymphatics via interstitial flow and autocrine CCR7 signaling.

Authors:  Jacqueline D Shields; Mark E Fleury; Carolyn Yong; Alice A Tomei; Gwendalyn J Randolph; Melody A Swartz
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  The interaction of plasminogen activator with a reconstituted basement membrane matrix and extracellular macromolecules produced by cultured epithelial cells.

Authors:  P G McGuire; N W Seeds
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.429

Review 6.  Stroma: tumor agonist or antagonist.

Authors:  David A Proia; Charlotte Kuperwasser
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2005-08-07       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Interstitial fluid flow induces myofibroblast differentiation and collagen alignment in vitro.

Authors:  Chee Ping Ng; Boris Hinz; Melody A Swartz
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2005-09-27       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Direct measurement of interstitial convection and diffusion of albumin in normal and neoplastic tissues by fluorescence photobleaching.

Authors:  S R Chary; R K Jain
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Collagen density promotes mammary tumor initiation and progression.

Authors:  Paolo P Provenzano; David R Inman; Kevin W Eliceiri; Justin G Knittel; Long Yan; Curtis T Rueden; John G White; Patricia J Keely
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Mast cell-derived particles deliver peripheral signals to remote lymph nodes.

Authors:  Christian A Kunder; Ashley L St John; Guojie Li; Kam W Leong; Brent Berwin; Herman F Staats; Soman N Abraham
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  6 in total

1.  Three-dimensional microfluidic collagen hydrogels for investigating flow-mediated tumor-endothelial signaling and vascular organization.

Authors:  Cara F Buchanan; Elizabeth E Voigt; Christopher S Szot; Joseph W Freeman; Pavlos P Vlachos; Marissa Nichole Rylander
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.056

2.  An interdisciplinary computational/experimental approach to evaluate drug-loaded gold nanoparticle tumor cytotoxicity.

Authors:  Louis T Curtis; Christopher G England; Min Wu; John Lowengrub; Hermann B Frieboes
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.307

Review 3.  Cancer research by means of tissue engineering--is there a rationale?

Authors:  Raymund E Horch; Anja M Boos; Yuan Quan; Oliver Bleiziffer; Rainer Detsch; Aldo R Boccaccini; Christoph Alexiou; Jiaming Sun; Justus P Beier; Andreas Arkudas
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 5.310

4.  Enhanced uptake and transport of PLGA-modified nanoparticles in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Lee B Sims; Louis T Curtis; Hermann B Frieboes; Jill M Steinbach-Rankins
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 10.435

5.  Absence of integrin α3β1 promotes the progression of HER2-driven breast cancer in vivo.

Authors:  Veronika Ramovs; Pablo Secades; Ji-Ying Song; Bram Thijssen; Maaike Kreft; Arnoud Sonnenberg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Interstitial Fluid Flow Increases Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Invasion through CXCR4/CXCL12 and MEK/ERK Signaling.

Authors:  Arpit D Shah; Michael J Bouchard; Adrian C Shieh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.