OBJECTIVE: To describe a theoretical framework for assessing knowledge about the possible outcomes of participating in bowel cancer screening for the faecal occult blood test. METHODS: The content of the knowledge measure was based on the UK General Medical Council's screening guidelines and a theory-based approach to assessing gist knowledge (Fuzzy Trace Theory). It comprised conceptual and numeric questions to assess knowledge of the underlying construct (e.g. false positive concept) and the approximate numbers affected (e.g. likelihood of a false positive). The measure was used in a randomised controlled trial involving 530 adults with low education, to compare the impact of a bowel screening decision aid with a screening information booklet developed for the Australian Government National Bowel Cancer Screening Program. RESULTS: The numeric knowledge scale was particularly responsive to the effects of the decision aid; at follow-up decision aid participants' numeric knowledge was significantly greater than the controls (P<0.001). This contrasts with the conceptual knowledge scale which improved significantly in both groups from baseline to follow-up (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our theory-based knowledge measure was responsive to change in conceptual knowledge and to the effect on numeric knowledge of a decision aid. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This theoretical framework has the potential to guide the development of knowledge measures in other screening settings.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To describe a theoretical framework for assessing knowledge about the possible outcomes of participating in bowel cancer screening for the faecal occult blood test. METHODS: The content of the knowledge measure was based on the UK General Medical Council's screening guidelines and a theory-based approach to assessing gist knowledge (Fuzzy Trace Theory). It comprised conceptual and numeric questions to assess knowledge of the underlying construct (e.g. false positive concept) and the approximate numbers affected (e.g. likelihood of a false positive). The measure was used in a randomised controlled trial involving 530 adults with low education, to compare the impact of a bowel screening decision aid with a screening information booklet developed for the Australian Government National Bowel Cancer Screening Program. RESULTS: The numeric knowledge scale was particularly responsive to the effects of the decision aid; at follow-up decision aid participants' numeric knowledge was significantly greater than the controls (P<0.001). This contrasts with the conceptual knowledge scale which improved significantly in both groups from baseline to follow-up (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our theory-based knowledge measure was responsive to change in conceptual knowledge and to the effect on numeric knowledge of a decision aid. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This theoretical framework has the potential to guide the development of knowledge measures in other screening settings.
Authors: Israel Berger; Sunny Wu; Philip Masson; Patrick J Kelly; Fiona A Duthie; William Whiteley; Daniel Parker; David Gillespie; Angela C Webster Journal: BMC Med Date: 2016-12-14 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Julia C M van Weert; Barbara C van Munster; Remco Sanders; René Spijker; Lotty Hooft; Jesse Jansen Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 2.796