Romolo Gaspari1, Matt Dayno, Justin Briones, David Blehar. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts University Hospital, 55 Lake Ave North Worcester, MA, 01655, USA. romolo.gaspari@umassmemorial.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of a superficial abscess is usually obtained through history and physical exam but bedside ultrasound (US) and computerized tomography (CT) are sometimes used to assist in the diagnosis. It is unclear which imaging modality is superior for patients with superficial soft tissue infections. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of CT and US in patients with skin and soft tissue infections. METHODS: Patients presenting with a suspected skin abscess that underwent both US and CT imaging were eligible for inclusion. Two physicians blinded to patient characteristics and other imaging results prospectively reviewed the CT and US images for pre-defined image elements, and in circumstances where there was disagreement between these interpretations, a third physician adjudicated the findings. The presence or absence of an abscess cavity was noted on imaging. Imaging detail was summarized using a pre-specified 4-point scale based on the degree of visible detail with higher numbers corresponding to greater detail. The clinical presence of an abscess was defined by surgical evacuation of purulence. Sensitivity and specificity for both CT and US were calculated using Chi square analysis. Comparison between imaging detail was performed using a Student's T-test. Data are presented with (95% confidence intervals) unless otherwise noted. RESULTS: Over an 18 month period 612 patients received a soft tissue bedside ultrasound with 65 of those patients receiving a CT for the same complaint. 30 of these 65 patients had an abscess located in the head and neck (37%), buttock (17%), lower extremity (17%), upper extremity (13%), torso (13%), or hand (3%). US demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of abscess of 96.7% (87.0% to 99.4%) and 85.7% (77.4% to 88.0%) respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of CT for the diagnosis of an abscess was 76.7% (65.5% to 82.8%) and 91.4% (81.8% to 96.7%) respectively Overall image detail ratings were superior for US compared to CT (3.5 vs 2.3, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: US is more sensitive then CT, but CT is more specific for superficial soft tissue abscesses. US demonstrated more visible detail within the abscess cavity compared to CT.
BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of a superficial abscess is usually obtained through history and physical exam but bedside ultrasound (US) and computerized tomography (CT) are sometimes used to assist in the diagnosis. It is unclear which imaging modality is superior for patients with superficial soft tissue infections. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of CT and US in patients with skin and soft tissue infections. METHODS:Patients presenting with a suspected skin abscess that underwent both US and CT imaging were eligible for inclusion. Two physicians blinded to patient characteristics and other imaging results prospectively reviewed the CT and US images for pre-defined image elements, and in circumstances where there was disagreement between these interpretations, a third physician adjudicated the findings. The presence or absence of an abscess cavity was noted on imaging. Imaging detail was summarized using a pre-specified 4-point scale based on the degree of visible detail with higher numbers corresponding to greater detail. The clinical presence of an abscess was defined by surgical evacuation of purulence. Sensitivity and specificity for both CT and US were calculated using Chi square analysis. Comparison between imaging detail was performed using a Student's T-test. Data are presented with (95% confidence intervals) unless otherwise noted. RESULTS: Over an 18 month period 612 patients received a soft tissue bedside ultrasound with 65 of those patients receiving a CT for the same complaint. 30 of these 65 patients had an abscess located in the head and neck (37%), buttock (17%), lower extremity (17%), upper extremity (13%), torso (13%), or hand (3%). US demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of abscess of 96.7% (87.0% to 99.4%) and 85.7% (77.4% to 88.0%) respectively. The overall sensitivity and specificity of CT for the diagnosis of an abscess was 76.7% (65.5% to 82.8%) and 91.4% (81.8% to 96.7%) respectively Overall image detail ratings were superior for US compared to CT (3.5 vs 2.3, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: US is more sensitive then CT, but CT is more specific for superficial soft tissue abscesses. US demonstrated more visible detail within the abscess cavity compared to CT.
Authors: C M Tiu; H J Chiou; Y H Chou; C C Hsu; K J Lin; C M Chen; J S Ko; L M Tseng; C R Lai; W Y Lui Journal: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei) Date: 2001-03
Authors: R Monina Klevens; Melissa A Morrison; Joelle Nadle; Susan Petit; Ken Gershman; Susan Ray; Lee H Harrison; Ruth Lynfield; Ghinwa Dumyati; John M Townes; Allen S Craig; Elizabeth R Zell; Gregory E Fosheim; Linda K McDougal; Roberta B Carey; Scott K Fridkin Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-10-17 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Owen Thomas; Alistair Ramsay; Marina Yiasemidou; Claire Hardie; Daniel Ashmore; Christopher Macklin; Dibyendu Bandyopadhyay; Joshua R Burke; David Jayne Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2020-11-27
Authors: Yu Wang; John M Thompson; Alyssa G Ashbaugh; Pavlo Khodakivskyi; Ghyslain Budin; Riccardo Sinisi; Andrew Heinmiller; Marleen van Oosten; Jan Maarten van Dijl; Gooitzen M van Dam; Kevin P Francis; Nicholas M Bernthal; Elena A Dubikovskaya; Lloyd S Miller Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 3.020