Literature DB >> 22870963

Cyclic X-ray responses in mammalian cells in vitro. 1968.

Warren K Sinclair.   

Abstract

Various radiation responses in mammalian cells depend on the position of the cell within its generation cycle (that is, its age) at the time of irradiation. Studies have most often been made by irradiating synchronized populations of cells in vitro. Results in different cell lines are not easy to compare, but an attempt has been made here to point out similarities and differences with regard to cell killing and division delay. In general, survival data obtained so far show that, in cells with a short G(1), cells are most sensitive in mitosis and in G(2), less sensitive in G(1), and least sensitive during the latter part of the S period. In cells with a long G(1), in addition to the above, there is usually a resistant phase early in G(1) followed by a sensitive stage near its end. (The latter may be as sensitive as mitosis.) Exceptions to the above, especially in some L cell sublines, have been noted, and a possible explanation is given. In Chinese hamster cells, maximum survival after irradiation occurs during S, but it does not coincide with the time of the maximum rate of DNA synthesis or with the time of the maximum number of cells in DNA synthesis, and changes in survival also occur in cells inhibited from synthesizing DNA. Rather, survival depends on the position the cell has reached in the cycle at that time, which involves not only DNA synthesis but other processes as well. Survival is not completely correlated with DNA synthesis, since halting DNA synthesis just before or just after irradiation only slightly affects survival at its maximum. Division delay exhibits a pattern of response which is similar in most cell lines. Delay is considerable for cells irradiated in mitosis, is small for cells in G(1), increases to a maximum for cells during S, and declines for cells in G(2). L cells or human kidney cells may have a longer delay for cells irradiated in G(2) than for those irradiated in S. The results can be explained in terms of a two-component model of division delay. One component results from the prolongation of the S period due to the reduced rate of DNA synthesis, and the other, a block in G(2), is independent of DNA synthesis. The proportion of the two components may vary in different cell lines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22870963     DOI: 10.1667/rrav09.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  5 in total

Review 1.  The changing paradigm of tumour response to irradiation.

Authors:  Richard P Hill
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  ALDH-1-positive cells exhibited a radioresistant phenotype that was enhanced with hypoxia in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Tingting Yao; Xueling Weng; Yao Yao; Chunxian Huang; Jing Li; Yongpai Peng; Rongchun Lin; Zhongqiu Lin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Carcinogenesis Induced by Low-dose Radiation.

Authors:  Igor Piotrowski; Katarzyna Kulcenty; Wiktoria Maria Suchorska; Agnieszka Skrobała; Małgorzata Skórska; Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska; Anna Kowalik; Weronika Jackowiak; Julian Malicki
Journal:  Radiol Oncol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Microtubule-targeting agents can sensitize cancer cells to ionizing radiation by an interphase-based mechanism.

Authors:  Daniel Markowitz; Grace Ha; Rosamaria Ruggieri; Marc Symons
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Oncogenic KRAS drives radioresistance through upregulation of NRF2-53BP1-mediated non-homologous end-joining repair.

Authors:  Linlin Yang; Changxian Shen; Adriana Estrada-Bernal; Ryan Robb; Moumita Chatterjee; Nikhil Sebastian; Amy Webb; Xiaokui Mo; Wei Chen; Sunil Krishnan; Terence M Williams
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 16.971

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.