Literature DB >> 22870533

Hypofractionated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: risks and potential benefits in a fiscally conservative health care system.

Sanjay Aneja1, Ramya R Pratiwadi, James B Yu.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of cancer death in American men and represents a significant factor in US health care costs. Radiation therapy serves as one of the most effective treatments for prostate cancer. However, radiation is also an expensive treatment modality and is a significant contributor to the overall rise in the cost of prostate cancer care. Currently, standard external beam radiation therapy for prostate cancer consists of between 75.6 and 81.0 Gy of radiation separated into 1.8- to 2-Gy doses (or "fractions") given daily for between 7 and 9 weeks. Recently, relatively shorter treatment schedules delivering more radiation per treatment-consisting of fractions > 2 Gy-over shorter time periods have been proposed in an effort to curtail rising health care costs and improve patient convenience. However, significant uncertainty still remains regarding outcomes from this type of more condensed treatment, known as"hypofractionated"radiation. In this article, we provide the historical background and rationale for hypofractionated prostate cancer treatment, discuss the potential benefits and risks of prostate hypofractionation, and review the clinical evidence regarding the effectiveness of hypofractionated radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22870533

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)        ISSN: 0890-9091            Impact factor:   2.990


  8 in total

Review 1.  Cost-Effectiveness of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: a Critical Review.

Authors:  Nataniel H Lester-Coll; David J Sher
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer: comparison of toxicity.

Authors:  James B Yu; Laura D Cramer; Jeph Herrin; Pamela R Soulos; Arnold L Potosky; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  High dose bystander effects in spatially fractionated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Rajalakshmi Asur; Karl T Butterworth; Jose A Penagaricano; Kevin M Prise; Robert J Griffin
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 8.679

4.  β1 integrin- and JNK-dependent tumor growth upon hypofractionated radiation.

Authors:  Aejaz Sayeed; Huimin Lu; Qin Liu; David Deming; Alexander Duffy; Peter McCue; Adam P Dicker; Roger J Davis; Dmitry Gabrilovich; Ulrich Rodeck; Dario C Altieri; Lucia R Languino
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-08-16

Review 5.  Cost-containment in hypofractionated radiation therapy: a literature review.

Authors:  Darren Hunter; Emily Mauldon; Nigel Anderson
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2018-03-13

6.  Association Between CYP17A1, CYB5A Polymorphisms and Efficacy of Abiraterone Acetate/Prednisone Treatment in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Xiang Wu; Qing-Jiang Xu; Ping-Zhou Chen; Chen-Bo Yu; Lie-Fu Ye; Tao Li
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2020-06-04

7.  Hypofractionated vs. standard radiotherapy for locally advanced limited-stage small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Nadia A Saeed; Lan Jin; Alexander W Sasse; Arya Amini; Vivek Verma; Nataniel H Lester-Coll; Po-Han Chen; Roy H Decker; Henry S Park
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Practical considerations for prostate hypofractionation in the developing world.

Authors:  Michael Yan; Andre G Gouveia; Fabio L Cury; Nikitha Moideen; Vanessa F Bratti; Horacio Patrocinio; Alejandro Berlin; Lucas C Mendez; Fabio Y Moraes
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 14.432

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.