| Literature DB >> 22870200 |
Alice M K Wong1, Wei-Han Chang, Pei-Chih Ke, Chun-Kai Huang, Tsai-Hsuan Tsai, Hsien-Tsung Chang, Wann-Yun Shieh, Hsiao-Lung Chan, Chih-Kuang Chen, Yu-Cheng Pei.
Abstract
The key components of caring for the elderly are diet, living, transportation, education, and safety issues, and telemedical systems can offer great assistance. Through the integration of personal to community information technology platforms, we have developed a new Intelligent Comprehensive Interactive Care (ICIC) system to provide comprehensive services for elderly care. The ICIC system consists of six items, including medical care (physiological measuring system, Medication Reminder, and Dr. Ubiquitous), diet, living, transportation, education (Intelligent Watch), entertainment (Sharetouch), and safety (Fall Detection). In this study, we specifically evaluated the users' intention of using the Medication Reminder, Dr. Ubiquitous, Sharetouch, and Intelligent Watch using a modified technological acceptance model (TAM). A total of 121 elderly subjects (48 males and 73 females) were recruited. The modified TAM questionnaires were collected after they had used these products. For most of the ICIC units, the elderly subjects revealed great willingness and/or satisfaction in using this system. The elderly users of the Intelligent Watch showed the greatest willingness and satisfaction, while the elderly users of Dr. Ubiquitous revealed fair willingness in the dimension of perceived ease of use. The old-old age group revealed greater satisfaction in the dimension of result demonstrability for the users of the Medication Reminder as compared to the young-old and oldest-old age groups. The women revealed greater satisfaction in the dimension of perceived ease of use for the users of Dr. Ubiquitous as compared to the men. There were no statistically significant differences in terms of gender, age, and education level in the other dimensions. The modified TAM showed its effectiveness in evaluating the acceptance and characteristics of technologic products for the elderly user. The ICIC system offers a user-friendly solution in telemedical care and improves the quality of care for the elderly.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22870200 PMCID: PMC3411612 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040591
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic data of the subjects who received TAM-2 evaluation for each ICIC unit.
| Gender | ||||
| Subcategory | Male | Female | Age (year ± SD) | Age range |
| Medication Reminder | 7 | 7 | 79.3±6.1 | 71–88 |
| Dr. U | 14 | 15 | 68.5±4.8 | 65–84 |
| Sharetouch | 17 | 32 | 78.3±7.5 | 65–91 |
| Intelligent Watch | 10 | 19 | 55.9±6.7 | 41–72 |
Figure 1Demonstration of the interactive use of Sharetouch by two elderly subjects.
Comparison of the normalized TMA-2 scores (mean score) among ICIC units and among TAM-2 dimensions.
| BI | PU | PEU | OQ | RD | En |
| |
| Medication Reminder | 5.1±2.2 | 5.6±1.4 | 5.4±1.5 | 5.3±1.7 | 5.8±1.3 | 0.66 | |
| Dr. U | 5.3±1.2 | 5.8±0.8 | 4.4±0.7 | 5.2±0.6 | 5.6±0.9 | 5.4±1.3 | <0.001*** |
| Sharetouch | 5.7±1.1 | 5.5±1.1 | 5.3±1.1 | 6.0±0.9 | 5.4±1.2 | 5.4±1.0 | <0.001*** |
| Intelligent Watch | 6.5±0.9 | 6.2±1.0 | 6.1±0.8 | 5.3±1.4 | 6.5±0.6 | <0.001*** | |
|
| <0.001*** | 0.06 | <0.001*** | 0.02 | <0.001*** | 0.97 |
: p<0.05; **: p<0.01, ***: p<0.001.
Abbreviations: BI = behavior intention, PU = perceived usefulness, PEU = perceived ease of use, OQ = output quality, RD = result demonstrability, En = enjoyment.
Gender and age differences in the TAM-2 scores (mean score) for Medication Reminder (n = 14).
| Gender | Age | ||||||
| Male | Female | Young-old | Old-old | Oldest-old | |||
| n = 7 | n = 7 |
| n = 4 | n = 7 | n = 3 |
| |
| BI | 5.7±2.1 | 4.6±2.4 | 0.29 | 5.1±1.3 | 5.3±2.6 | 4.8±2.9 | 0.80 |
| PU | 5.7±1.7 | 5.6±1.3 | 0.84 | 5.0±1.4 | 6.2±1.1 | 5.2±2.0 | 0.38 |
| PEU | 5.5±1.5 | 5.2±1.6 | 0.60 | 5.0±1.7 | 5.9±1.5 | 4.7±1.0 | 0.25 |
| OQ | 5.5±1.6 | 5.1±1.8 | 0.61 | 4.3±1.7 | 5.9±1.8 | 5.2±0.6 | 0.09 |
| RD | 5.9±1.3 | 5.7±1.3 | 0.79 | 4.4±0.7 | 6.7±0.5 | 5.4±1.5 | 0.02 |
| O.M. | 5.7±1.3 | 5.2±1.0 | 0.52 | 4.8±1.1 | 6.0±1.1 | 5.1±0.5 | 0.14 |
: p<0.05.
Abbreviations: BI = behavior intention, PU = perceived usefulness, PEU = perceived ease of use, OQ = output quality, RD = result demonstrability, O.M. = overall mean.
Gender, age, and education differences in the TAM-2 scores (mean scores) for Dr. U (n = 29).
| Gender | Age | Education | |||||||||
| Male | Female | Y–O | O–O & Oest-O | PS | JS | SHS | B | ||||
| n = 14 | n = 15 |
| n = 24 | n = 5 |
| n = 2 | n = 12 | n = 3 | n = 12 |
| |
| BI | 5.2±1.2 | 5.3±1.3 | 0.64 | 5.3±1.2 | 5.4±1.7 | 0.88 | 5.2±1.0 | 5.2±1.5 | 5.0±0.9 | 5.4±1.2 | 0.94 |
| PU | 5.9±0.9 | 5.7±0.8 | 0.79 | 5.9±0.8 | 5.6±1.1 | 0.38 | 5.8±0.5 | 5.7±0.9 | 5.6±0.3 | 6.1±0.9 | 0.68 |
| PEU | 4.2±0.7 | 4.7±0.7 | 0.04 | 4.5±0.8 | 4.3±0.7 | 0.90 | 5.1±1.6 | 4.6±0.7 | 4.8±0.8 | 4.1±0.5 | 0.22 |
| OQ | 5.2±0.6 | 5.4±0.6 | 0.11 | 5.3±0.6 | 5.1±0.8 | 0.86 | 5.4±0.5 | 5.5±0.6 | 5.0±0.7 | 5.0±0.7 | 0.59 |
| RD | 5.7±1.0 | 5.6±1.0 | 0.95 | 5.7±0.9 | 5.4±1.2 | 0.41 | 5.1±1.0 | 5.6±1.0 | 5.3±0.4 | 5.9±0.9 | 0.67 |
| En | 5.3±1.4 | 5.4±1.2 | 0.87 | 5.4±1.3 | 5.2±1.4 | 0.61 | 4.4±0.5 | 5.3±1.3 | 5.5±1.5 | 5.6±1.4 | 0.49 |
| O.M. | 5.2±0.7 | 5.3±0.7 | 0.54 | 5.3±0.6 | 5.2±1.0 | 0.77 | 5.2±0.9 | 5.3±0.8 | 5.2±0.5 | 5.3±0.7 | 0.95 |
: p<0.05.
Abbreviations: Y–O = young-old, O–O = old-old, Oest-O = oldest-old, PS = primary school, JS = junior school, SHS = senior high school, B = Bachelor, BI = behavior intention, PU = perceived usefulness, PEU = perceived ease of use, OQ = output quality, RD = result demonstrability, En = enjoyment, O.M. = overall mean.
Gender, age, and education differences in the TAM-2 scores (mean score) for Sharetouch (n = 49).
| Gender | Age | Education | ||||||||||
| Male | Female | Y–O | O–O | Oest-O | PS | JS | SHS | B | ||||
| n = 17 | n = 32 |
| n = 11 | n = 29 | n = 9 |
| n = 5 | n = 7 | n = 14 | n = 23 |
| |
| BI | 5.9±1.1 | 5.6±1.1 | 0.34 | 5.7±0.8 | 5.8±1.3 | 5.3±0.8 | 0.13 | 6.6±0.4 | 5.7±1.1 | 5.6±1.3 | 5.6±1.0 | 0.15 |
| PU | 5.5±1.0 | 5.5±1.1 | 0.84 | 5.7±1.0 | 5.5±1.2 | 5.3±0.8 | 0.44 | 6.1±0.6 | 6.0±0.8 | 5.4±1.4 | 5.3±1.0 | 0.39 |
| PEU | 5.3±1.1 | 5.1±1.0 | 0.50 | 5.2±0.9 | 5.3±1.2 | 5.3±0.8 | 0.78 | 5.7±0.9 | 5.8±0.7 | 4.9±1.4 | 5.2±0.9 | 0.38 |
| OQ | 5.9±1.0 | 6.1±0.9 | 0.72 | 6.0±0.9 | 6.0±1.0 | 6.3±0.6 | 0.83 | 6.3±1.0 | 6.2±1.1 | 5.8±1.1 | 6.0±0.8 | 0.69 |
| RD | 5.4±1.1 | 5.3±1.2 | 0.85 | 5.7±1.0 | 5.2±1.4 | 5.4±0.7 | 0.56 | 5.9±0.9 | 5.7±1.1 | 4.7±1.5 | 5.5±0.9 | 0.27 |
| En | 5.3±1.3 | 5.4±0.8 | 0.88 | 5.4±0.9 | 5.5±1.0 | 5.2±1.0 | 0.52 | 5.9±0.6 | 5.5±0.5 | 5.0±1.3 | 5.5±1.0 | 0.48 |
| O.M. | 5.5±0.8 | 5.5±0.9 | 0.99 | 5.6±0.8 | 5.5±1.0 | 5.4±0.5 | 0.70 | 6.0±0.6 | 5.9±0.6 | 5.2±1.2 | 5.5±0.6 | 0.26 |
Abbreviation: Y–O = young-old, O–O = old-old, Oest-O = oldest-old, PS = primary school, JS = junior school, SHS = senior high school, B = Bachelor, BI = behavior intention, PU = perceived usefulness, PEU = perceived ease of use, OQ = output quality, RD = result demonstrability, En = enjoyment, O.M. = overall mean.
Gender, age, and education differences in the TAM-2 scores (mean score) for Intelligent Watch (n = 29).
| Gender | Age (years) | Education | ||||||||||
| Male | Female | 41–50 | 51–60 | >61 | PS | JS | SHS | B | ||||
| n = 10 | n = 19 |
| n = 6 | n = 17 | n = 6 |
| n = 9 | n = 8 | n = 7 | n = 5 |
| |
| BI | 6.5±1.0 | 6.5±0.9 | 0.75 | 6.9±0.2 | 6.4±0.9 | 6.2±1.2 | 0.33 | 6.2±1.2 | 6.7±0.5 | 6.3±1.1 | 6.7±0.7 | 0.82 |
| PU | 6.2±1.1 | 6.1±0.9 | 0.74 | 6.8±0.3 | 6.0±1.0 | 5.9±1.2 | 0.13 | 6.0±1.0 | 6.4±0.9 | 6.2±1.0 | 6.0±1.1 | 0.81 |
| PEU | 6.1±0.8 | 6.1±0.8 | 0.93 | 6.3±0.7 | 6.1±0.7 | 6.0±1.0 | 0.94 | 6.2±0.9 | 6.3±0.7 | 5.9±0.7 | 5.9±0.6 | 0.36 |
| OQ | 5.0±1.8 | 5.5±1.2 | 0.54 | 5.8±1.2 | 5.3±1.6 | 4.8±0.8 | 0.30 | 5.5±1.3 | 5.4±0.9 | 5.0±2.1 | 5.3±1.4 | 0.99 |
| RD | 6.4±0.7 | 6.5±0.6 | 0.98 | 6.6±0.5 | 6.3±0.7 | 6.8±0.5 | 0.29 | 6.6±0.6 | 6.5±0.5 | 6.4±0.5 | 6.2±1.1 | 0.95 |
| O.M. | 6.1±0.8 | 6.2±0.6 | 0.98 | 6.5±0.4 | 6.1±0.7 | 6.0±0.7 | 0.42 | 6.1±0.8 | 6.3±0.5 | 6.0±0.8 | 6.0±0.8 | 0.90 |
Abbreviations: PS = primary school, JS = junior school, SHS = senior high school, B = Bachelor, BI = behavior intention, PU = perceived usefulness, PEU = perceived ease of use, OQ = output quality, RD = result demonstrability, O.M. = overall mean.