| Literature DB >> 2287015 |
M Evans1.
Abstract
Does it matter that the hearts of 'brainstem dead' patients may persist in beating spontaneously? Hostile reactions, to the Danish inclusion of cardiac criteria in the determination of death, betray reductionist views of human life at the core of 'brainstem' conceptions of death. Such views (whether centred on neurological function or on abstractions concerning 'personhood') supplant the richness of human life and death with the poverty of essentialism: and mask the lethal nature of beating-heart organ retrieval. The affirmation of cardiac criteria for death is not an alternative form of essentialism as some critics suppose, but part of an understanding of human life and death which rejects essentialism altogether. The spontaneously persistent heartbeat does not constitute human life, but most certainly counts for it.Entities:
Keywords: Analytical Approach; Danish Council of Ethics; Death and Euthanasia; Philosophical Approach
Mesh:
Year: 1990 PMID: 2287015 PMCID: PMC1375910 DOI: 10.1136/jme.16.4.191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Med Ethics ISSN: 0306-6800 Impact factor: 2.903