Literature DB >> 22870074

Regulating the Regulator: Phosphorylation of PKC θ in T Cells.

Michael Freeley1, Aideen Long.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22870074      PMCID: PMC3409363          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


× No keyword cloud information.
Protein kinase C θ (PKC θ) is a serine/threonine kinase that is now firmly established as a central component in T cell activation, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis (Hayashi and Altman, 2007). Since it was first discovered that PKC θ re-localizes to the immunological synapse (IS) in conventional effector T cells following T cell stimulation, many roles have now been defined for this kinase in these cells such as (a) activation of NF-κB, AP-1, and NFAT transcription factors that control the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the anti-apoptotic molecule Bcl-xL (Hayashi and Altman, 2007), (b) regulation of IS dynamics (Sims et al., 2007), (c) up-regulation and clustering of the integrin LFA-1 on the T cell surface (Tan et al., 2006; Letschka et al., 2008) – thus facilitating stable adhesion between T cells and antigen-presenting cells (APC) and/or migration into inflamed tissues, (d) re-orientation of the microtubule-organizing center toward the APC (Quann et al., 2011), and (e) fine tuning of T cell activation by regulating the intracellular localization, degradation, and internalization of key signaling molecules (Nika et al., 2006; von Essen et al., 2006; Gruber et al., 2009). A new function for PKC θ has also recently been revealed with the finding that this kinase regulates an inducible gene expression program in T cells by associating with chromatin in the nucleus (Sutcliffe et al., 2011). A host of studies have now convincingly demonstrated that targeting PKC θ could be a viable therapeutic strategy to block the T cell inflammatory response in autoimmunity, allergy, and allograft rejection (Marsland and Kopf, 2008; Zanin-Zhorov et al., 2011; Altman and Kong, 2012). For example, PKC θ-deficient mice (PKC θ−/−) have reduced incidence and severity of Th2 and Th17-mediated inflammatory disorders, including asthma, inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, arthritis, and allograft rejection in comparison to their wild-type littermates (PKC θ+/+; Marsland and Kopf, 2008; Zanin-Zhorov et al., 2011; Altman and Kong, 2012). Intriguingly, PKCθ−/− mice are still capable of mounting relatively normal Th1 and CD8+ T cell-mediated immune responses to infectious viruses (Marsland and Kopf, 2008; Zanin-Zhorov et al., 2011; Altman and Kong, 2012). Secondly, the recent finding that inhibition of PKC θ increases the suppressive activity of regulatory T cells (Zanin-Zhorov et al., 2010) suggests that therapeutic strategies designed to inhibit this kinase may hold great promise in diverting the pro/anti-inflammatory balance toward a reduction in inflammation in T cell autoimmunity and allergy, whilst at the same time maintaining immunity to viral pathogens. Lastly, that PKC θ has a restricted tissue expression profile and is highly expressed in T cells suggests that targeting this molecule with specific inhibitors should have minimal effects in other cells and tissues (Hayashi and Altman, 2007; Altman and Kong, 2012). In spite of all this promising data however, a number of studies have demonstrated that targeting PKC θ could potentially have some undesired effects. For example, it has been reported that CD8+ T cells from PKC θ−/− mice have a survival defect following activation (Barouch-Bentov et al., 2005; Saibil et al., 2007; Kingeter and Schaefer, 2008). In addition, it has been reported that PKC θ−/− mice have an impaired anti-leukemic response (Garaude et al., 2008), which likely results from reduced tumor surveillance in vivo. It is important therefore that these issues are addressed in respect of any PKC θ-targeting strategies that are developed in the future. Although much has been learned about PKC θ in T cells, considerable gaps still exist in our knowledge as to how this kinase is regulated, including the upstream signals and interacting partners that control its intracellular localization and catalytic activation at various locations in the cell. Furthermore, although a plethora of substrates that are phosphorylated by PKC θ in vitro have now been characterized (Nika et al., 2006; Hayashi and Altman, 2007; Letschka et al., 2008), whether any of these are bona fide substrates in vivo remains to be addressed. Like many other kinases, PKC θ is also regulated by phosphorylation on a host of serine, threonine, and tyrosine residues that influence its activity and intracellular localization. Six phosphorylation sites have been mapped on PKC θ in T cells to date. Some of these sites appear to be phosphorylated by unrelated upstream kinases, while other sites are regulated via auto-phosphorylation. Three of these phosphorylation sites are highly conserved on most other PKC isoforms, which suggests that they may regulate aspects that are central to all isoforms, such as stability. In contrast, PKC θ contains three phosphorylation sites that appear to be unique to this isoform.1 Therefore PKC θ may execute distinct functions and/or be regulated differently in T cells (Freeley et al., 2011). In this issue of Frontiers in T Cell Biology, Wang et al. (2012) summarize the regulation of PKC θ by phosphorylation during T cell signaling. Understanding the pathways that regulate PKC θ in T cells may provide additional therapeutic targets for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.
  19 in total

1.  PKCθ: a new target for selective immunosuppression.

Authors:  Amnon Altman; Kok-Fai Kong
Journal:  Expert Rev Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.473

2.  Protein kinase C (PKC) alpha and PKC theta are the major PKC isotypes involved in TCR down-regulation.

Authors:  Marina von Essen; Martin W Nielsen; Charlotte M Bonefeld; Lasse Boding; Jeppe M Larsen; Michael Leitges; Gottfried Baier; Niels Odum; Carsten Geisler
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 3.  T-cell fate and function: PKC-theta and beyond.

Authors:  Benjamin J Marsland; Manfred Kopf
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 16.687

4.  Protein kinase C-theta is an early survival factor required for differentiation of effector CD8+ T cells.

Authors:  Rina Barouch-Bentov; Edward E Lemmens; Junru Hu; Edith M Janssen; Nathalie M Droin; Jianxun Song; Stephen P Schoenberger; Amnon Altman
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 5.422

5.  CD4+ and CD8+ T cell survival is regulated differentially by protein kinase Ctheta, c-Rel, and protein kinase B.

Authors:  Samuel D Saibil; Russell G Jones; Elissa K Deenick; Nicole Liadis; Alisha R Elford; Mitchell G Vainberg; Heather Baerg; James R Woodgett; Steve Gerondakis; Pamela S Ohashi
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 5.422

6.  Resistance to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and impaired IL-17 production in protein kinase C theta-deficient mice.

Authors:  Seng-Lai Tan; Jingyong Zhao; Chen Bi; Xinyi Cynthia Chen; Deena L Hepburn; Jian Wang; Jonathon D Sedgwick; Subba R Chintalacharuvu; Songqing Na
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  PKC-theta selectively controls the adhesion-stimulating molecule Rap1.

Authors:  Thomas Letschka; Veronika Kollmann; Christa Pfeifhofer-Obermair; Christina Lutz-Nicoladoni; Gerald J Obermair; Friedrich Fresser; Michael Leitges; Natascha Hermann-Kleiter; Sandra Kaminski; Gottfried Baier
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Opposing effects of PKCtheta and WASp on symmetry breaking and relocation of the immunological synapse.

Authors:  Tasha N Sims; Timothy J Soos; Harry S Xenias; Benjamin Dubin-Thaler; Jake M Hofman; Janelle C Waite; Thomas O Cameron; V Kaye Thomas; Rajat Varma; Chris H Wiggins; Michael P Sheetz; Dan R Littman; Michael L Dustin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Impaired anti-leukemic immune response in PKCtheta-deficient mice.

Authors:  Johan Garaude; Sandra Kaminski; Seyma Charni; Juan Ignacio Aguilò; Chantal Jacquet; Marc Plays; Javier Hernandez; Fernando Rodriguez; Robert A Hipskind; Alberto Anel; Martin Villalba
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 4.407

Review 10.  Protein kinase C theta (PKCtheta): a key player in T cell life and death.

Authors:  Keitaro Hayashi; Amnon Altman
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 7.658

View more
  7 in total

1.  Guanine nucleotide exchange factor αPIX leads to activation of the Rac 1 GTPase/glycogen phosphorylase pathway in interleukin (IL)-2-stimulated T cells.

Authors:  Francisco Llavero; Bakarne Urzelai; Nerea Osinalde; Patricia Gálvez; Hadriano M Lacerda; Luis A Parada; José L Zugaza
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Phosphotyrosine-dependent interaction between the kinases PKCθ and Zap70 promotes proximal TCR signaling.

Authors:  Jiji Xie; Xuemei Han; Chensi Zhao; Ann J Canonigo-Balancio; John R Yates; Yingqiu Li; Björn F Lillemeier; Amnon Altman
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 8.192

3.  Protein kinase C signaling and cell cycle regulation.

Authors:  Adrian R Black; Jennifer D Black
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Swiprosin-1 Expression Is Up-Regulated through Protein Kinase C-θ and NF-κB Pathway in T Cells.

Authors:  Young-Dae Kim; Min-Sung Kwon; Bo-Ra Na; Hye-Ran Kim; Hyun-Su Lee; Chang-Duk Jun
Journal:  Immune Netw       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 6.303

5.  Regulation of immune system cell functions by protein kinase C.

Authors:  Noah Isakov; Amnon Altman
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Relaxin reverses inflammatory and immune signals in aged hearts.

Authors:  Brian Martin; Beth Ann Gabris-Weber; Rajiv Reddy; Guillermo Romero; Ansuman Chattopadhyay; Guy Salama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  CG-NAP/Kinase Interactions Fine-Tune T Cell Functions.

Authors:  Navin Kumar Verma; Madhavi Latha Somaraju Chalasani; John D Scott; Dermot Kelleher
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 7.561

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.