Literature DB >> 22869799

Lifting options for stratospheric aerosol geoengineering: advantages of tethered balloon systems.

Peter Davidson1, Chris Burgoyne, Hugh Hunt, Matt Causier.   

Abstract

The Royal Society report 'Geoengineering the Climate' identified solar radiation management using albedo-enhancing aerosols injected into the stratosphere as the most affordable and effective option for geoengineering, but did not consider in any detail the options for delivery. This paper provides outline engineering analyses of the options, both for batch-delivery processes, following up on previous work for artillery shells, missiles, aircraft and free-flying balloons, as well as a more lengthy analysis of continuous-delivery systems that require a pipe connected to the ground and supported at a height of 20 km, either by a tower or by a tethered balloon. Towers are shown not to be practical, but a tethered balloon delivery system, with high-pressure pumping, appears to have much lower operating and capital costs than all other delivery options. Instead of transporting sulphuric acid mist precursors, such a system could also be used to transport slurries of high refractive index particles such as coated titanium dioxide. The use of such particles would allow useful experiments on opacity, coagulation and atmospheric chemistry at modest rates so as not to perturb regional or global climatic conditions, thus reducing scale-up risks. Criteria for particle choice are discussed, including the need to minimize or prevent ozone destruction. The paper estimates the time scales and relatively modest costs required if a tethered balloon system were to be introduced in a measured way with testing and development work proceeding over three decades, rather than in an emergency. The manufacture of a tether capable of sustaining the high tensions and internal pressures needed, as well as strong winds, is a significant challenge, as is the development of the necessary pumping and dispersion technologies. The greatest challenge may be the manufacture and launch of very large balloons, but means have been identified to significantly reduce the size of such balloons or aerostats.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22869799     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  5 in total

1.  Geoengineering: taking control of our planet's climate?

Authors:  Andy Ridgwell; Chris Freeman; Richard Lampitt
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Impacts of hemispheric solar geoengineering on tropical cyclone frequency.

Authors:  Anthony C Jones; James M Haywood; Nick Dunstone; Kerry Emanuel; Matthew K Hawcroft; Kevin I Hodges; Andy Jones
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 3.  Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals.

Authors:  Mark G Lawrence; Stefan Schäfer; Helene Muri; Vivian Scott; Andreas Oschlies; Naomi E Vaughan; Olivier Boucher; Hauke Schmidt; Jim Haywood; Jürgen Scheffran
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Isothermal pumping analysis for high-altitude tethered balloons.

Authors:  Kirsty A Kuo; Hugh E M Hunt
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  The international politics of geoengineering: The feasibility of Plan B for tackling climate change.

Authors:  Olaf Corry
Journal:  Secur Dialogue       Date:  2017-07-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.