Literature DB >> 22869623

Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes after surgical repair of complete proximal hamstring ruptures: does the tendon heal?

Jaskarndip Chahal1, Charles A Bush-Joseph, Alex Chow, Anthony Zelazny, Richard C Mather, Emery C Lin, Deepti Gupta, Nikhil N Verma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of validated outcome questionnaires and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when assessing outcomes after surgical treatment of proximal hamstring avulsions has been limited.
PURPOSE: To comprehensively evaluate clinical, functional, and radiological outcomes in patients treated with surgical repair for complete proximal hamstring avulsions. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 15 consecutive patients was performed. Outcome measures included the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Proximal Hamstring Injury Questionnaire, Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Harris Hip Score (HHS), and Tegner Activity Scale (TAS). Physical examination was performed by an independent sports medicine fellow. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lower extremity was used to assess tendon healing and muscle quality after repair.
RESULTS: Thirteen of 15 (87%) eligible patients were available for follow-up at a mean 36.9 months (range, 27-63 months), including 8 men and 6 left-sided injuries. The average age was 44.6 years (range, 26-58 years). Twelve of 13 patients underwent surgical repair within 60 days of injury. Mean (± standard deviation) postoperative functional outcome scores were as follows: LEFS, 74.9 ± 7.8 (range, 59-80); HHS, 90.7 ± 13.9 (range, 67-100); SANE, 93.6 ± 7.5 (range, 75-100); VAS for pain, 1.3 ± 1.9 (range, 0-5); and TAS, 4.6 ± 2.3 (range, 1-7). All 11 patients who participated in sports before surgery were able to return to sport, but 45% reported a decrease in their current level of activity. Isokinetic muscle testing demonstrated that injured hamstring strength recovered up to 78% ± 6.1% (range, 74%-88%) of the contralateral side. The MRI examinations revealed that 100% of patients had a healed proximal hamstring repair, with signs of tendinopathy and mild atrophy in 3 of 12 patients.
CONCLUSION: The current findings indicate that surgical repair of complete hamstring ruptures provides reliable pain relief, good functional outcomes, high satisfaction rates, and excellent healing rates (MRI) but does not fully restore hamstring function and sports activity to preinjury levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22869623     DOI: 10.1177/0363546512453298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  21 in total

1.  Treatment of hamstring strain in a collegiate pole-vaulter integrating dry needling with an eccentric training program: a resident's case report.

Authors:  Scott C Dembowski; Richard B Westrick; Edo Zylstra; Michael R Johnson
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-06

2.  Functional impairment after successful surgical reconstruction for proximal hamstring avulsion.

Authors:  Raymond Best; Julia Eberle; Florian Beck; Johannes Beckmann; Ulrich Becker
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Repair of Proximal Hamstring Tears: A Surgical Technique.

Authors:  Gilbert Moatshe; Jorge Chahla; Alexander R Vap; Marcio Ferrari; George Sanchez; Justin J Mitchell; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-03-13

4.  [Proximal rupture of the hamstring tendon : From clinical presentation to diagnosis and therapy].

Authors:  S Bauer; M Riegger; K J Friedrich; W Reichert; W G Blakeney; C Haag
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  [Complete proximal hamstring tendon tear : Anchor-based sliding suture technique for reduction and fixation].

Authors:  S Bauer; M Riegger; W Reichert; W G Blakeney; C Haag
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the attachment sites of the proximal hamstrings.

Authors:  Marc J Philippon; Fernando P Ferro; Kevin J Campbell; Max P Michalski; Mary T Goldsmith; Brian M Devitt; Coen A Wijdicks; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Gross anatomical and dimensional characteristics of the proximal hamstring origin.

Authors:  Matthias J Feucht; Johannes E Plath; Gernot Seppel; Stefan Hinterwimmer; Andreas B Imhoff; Peter U Brucker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Used After Proximal Hamstring Repair.

Authors:  Tara Reza; Andrew J Hinkle; Andre Perez-Chaumont; Symone M Brown; Mary K Mulcahey
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-05-07

9.  [Clinical results after refixation of proximal hamstring tendon ruptures comparing different anchor systems].

Authors:  M Irger; P Forkel; A B Imhoff; L Willinger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Proximal Hamstring Repair Strength: A Biomechanical Analysis at 3 Hip Flexion Angles.

Authors:  Margaret Ann Harvey; Hardeep Singh; Elifho Obopilwe; Ryan Charette; Suzanne Miller
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2015-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.