Literature DB >> 22869566

Population pharmacokinetics of conventional and intermittent dosing of liposomal amphotericin B in adults: a first critical step for rational design of innovative regimens.

William W Hope1, Joanne Goodwin, Timothy W Felton, Michael Ellis, David A Stevens.   

Abstract

There is increased interest in intermittent regimen of liposomal amphotericin B, which may facilitate use in ambulatory settings. Little is known, however, about the most appropriate dosage and schedule of administration. Plasma pharmacokinetic data were acquired from 30 patients receiving liposomal amphotericin B for empirical treatment of suspected invasive fungal infection. Two cohorts were studied. The first cohort received 3 mg of liposomal amphotericin B/kg of body weight/day; the second cohort received 10 mg of liposomal amphotericin B/kg at time zero, followed by 5 mg/kg at 48 and 120 h. The levels of liposomal amphotericin B were measured by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). The pharmacokinetics were estimated by using a population methodology. Monte Carlo simulations were performed. D-optimal design was used to identify maximally informative sampling times for both conventional and intermittent regimens for future studies. A three-compartment pharmacokinetic model best described the data. The pharmacokinetics for both conventional and intermittent dosing were linear. The estimates for the mean (standard deviation) for clearance and the volume of the central compartment were 1.60 (0.85) liter/h and 20.61 (15.27) liters, respectively. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated considerable variability in drug exposure. Bayesian estimates for clearance and volume increased in a linear manner with weight, but only the former was statistically significant (P = 0.039). D-optimal design provided maximally informative sampling times for future pharmacokinetic studies. The pharmacokinetics of a conventional and an intermittently administered high-dose regimen liposomal amphotericin B are linear. Further pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic preclinical and clinical studies are required to identify safe and effective intermittent regimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22869566      PMCID: PMC3457383          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00933-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  31 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic comparison of amphotericin B (AMB) and two lipid-associated AMB preparations, liposomal AMB and AMB lipid complex, in murine candidiasis models.

Authors:  D Andes; N Safdar; K Marchillo; R Conklin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Liposomal amphotericin B as initial therapy for invasive mold infection: a randomized trial comparing a high-loading dose regimen with standard dosing (AmBiLoad trial).

Authors:  Oliver A Cornely; Johan Maertens; Mark Bresnik; Ramin Ebrahimi; Andrew J Ullmann; Emilio Bouza; Claus Peter Heussel; Olivier Lortholary; Christina Rieger; Angelika Boehme; Mickael Aoun; Heinz-August Horst; Anne Thiebaut; Markus Ruhnke; Dietmar Reichert; Nicola Vianelli; Stefan W Krause; Eduardo Olavarria; Raoul Herbrecht
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-04-09       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Evaluation and comparison of simple multiple model, richer data multiple model, and sequential interacting multiple model (IMM) Bayesian analyses of gentamicin and vancomycin data collected from patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery.

Authors:  Iona Macdonald; Christine E Staatz; Roger W Jelliffe; Alison H Thomson
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.681

4.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of amphotericin B deoxycholate, liposomal amphotericin B, and amphotericin B lipid complex in an in vitro model of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis.

Authors:  Jodi M Lestner; Susan J Howard; Joanne Goodwin; Lea Gregson; Jayesh Majithiya; Thomas J Walsh; Gerard M Jensen; William W Hope
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-05-03       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Alternative dosing regimens of liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) effective in treating murine systemic candidiasis.

Authors:  Jill P Adler-Moore; Jon A Olson; Richard T Proffitt
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2004-10-27       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  High-dose weekly liposomal amphotericin B antifungal prophylaxis following reduced-intensity conditioning allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  J El-Cheikh; C Faucher; S Fürst; S Duran; P Berger; N Vey; A-M Stoppa; R Bouabdallah; J-A Gastaut; P Viens; D Blaise; M Mohty
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Compartmentalized intrapulmonary pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B and its lipid formulations.

Authors:  Andreas H Groll; Caron A Lyman; Vidmantas Petraitis; Ruta Petraitiene; Derek Armstrong; Diana Mickiene; Raul M Alfaro; Robert L Schaufele; Tin Sein; John Bacher; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Safety of a weekly high dose of liposomal amphotericin B for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection in immunocompromised patients: PROPHYSOME Study.

Authors:  Catherine Cordonnier; Mohamad Mohty; Catherine Faucher; Cécile Pautas; Marie Robin; Norbert Vey; Françoise Monchecourt; Lamine Mahi; Patricia Ribaud
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 5.283

9.  Micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for candidaemia and invasive candidosis: a phase III randomised double-blind trial.

Authors:  Ernst-Rüdiger Kuse; Ploenchan Chetchotisakd; Clovis Arns da Cunha; Markus Ruhnke; Carlos Barrios; Digumarti Raghunadharao; Jagdev Singh Sekhon; Antonio Freire; Venkatasubramanian Ramasubramanian; Ignace Demeyer; Marcio Nucci; Amorn Leelarasamee; Frédérique Jacobs; Johan Decruyenaere; Didier Pittet; Andrew J Ullmann; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Olivier Lortholary; Sonja Koblinger; Heike Diekmann-Berndt; Oliver A Cornely
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Clinical practice guidelines for the management of candidiasis: 2009 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Peter G Pappas; Carol A Kauffman; David Andes; Daniel K Benjamin; Thierry F Calandra; John E Edwards; Scott G Filler; John F Fisher; Bart-Jan Kullberg; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Annette C Reboli; John H Rex; Thomas J Walsh; Jack D Sobel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  18 in total

1.  In Vitro and In Vivo Exposure-Effect Relationship of Liposomal Amphotericin B against Aspergillus fumigatus.

Authors:  Maria Siopi; Johan W Mouton; Spyros Pournaras; Joseph Meletiadis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Extended Dosing Regimens for Fungal Prophylaxis.

Authors:  Thomas Lehrnbecher; Konrad Bochennek; Thomas Klingebiel; Silke Gastine; Georg Hempel; Andreas H Groll
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Pharmacodynamics of amphotericin B deoxycholate, amphotericin B lipid complex, and liposomal amphotericin B against Aspergillus fumigatus.

Authors:  Zaid Al-Nakeeb; Vidmantas Petraitis; Joanne Goodwin; Ruta Petraitiene; Thomas J Walsh; William W Hope
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Population Pharmacokinetics of Liposomal Amphotericin B in Immunocompromised Children.

Authors:  Jodi M Lestner; Andreas H Groll; Ghaith Aljayyoussi; Nita L Seibel; Aziza Shad; Corina Gonzalez; Lauren V Wood; Paul F Jarosinski; Thomas J Walsh; William W Hope
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Amphotericin B formulations: a comparative review of efficacy and toxicity.

Authors:  Richard J Hamill
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Liposomal Amphotericin B (AmBisome(®)): A Review of the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Clinical Experience and Future Directions.

Authors:  Neil R H Stone; Tihana Bicanic; Rahuman Salim; William Hope
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Systemically Administered Antileishmanial Drugs.

Authors:  Anke E Kip; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Thomas P C Dorlo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Pharmacodynamics of liposomal amphotericin B and flucytosine for cryptococcal meningoencephalitis: safe and effective regimens for immunocompromised patients.

Authors:  Lucy O'Connor; Joanne Livermore; Andrew D Sharp; Joanne Goodwin; Lea Gregson; Susan J Howard; Timothy W Felton; Julie A Schwartz; Michael N Neely; Thomas S Harrison; John R Perfect; William W Hope
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  AMBITION-cm: intermittent high dose AmBisome on a high dose fluconazole backbone for cryptococcal meningitis induction therapy in sub-Saharan Africa: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mooketsi Molefi; Awilly A Chofle; Síle F Molloy; Samuel Kalluvya; John M Changalucha; Francesca Cainelli; Tshepo Leeme; Nametso Lekwape; Drew W Goldberg; Miriam Haverkamp; Gregory P Bisson; John R Perfect; Emili Letang; Lukas Fenner; Graeme Meintjes; Rosie Burton; Tariro Makadzange; Chiratidzo E Ndhlovu; William Hope; Thomas S Harrison; Joseph N Jarvis
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  How to manage aspergillosis in non-neutropenic intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Elda Righi; Gennaro De Pascale; Raffaele De Gaudio; Antonino Giarratano; Tereesita Mazzei; Giulia Morace; Nicola Petrosillo; Stefania Stefani; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.