BACKGROUND: Sleep plays a critical role in maintaining health and well-being; however, patients who are hospitalized are frequently exposed to noise that can disrupt sleep. Efforts to attenuate hospital noise have been limited by incomplete information on the interaction between sounds and sleep physiology. OBJECTIVE: To determine profiles of acoustic disruption of sleep by examining the cortical (encephalographic) arousal responses during sleep to typical hospital noises by sound level and type and sleep stage. DESIGN: 3-day polysomnographic study. SETTING: Sound-attenuated sleep laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteer sample of 12 healthy participants. INTERVENTION: Baseline (sham) night followed by 2 intervention nights with controlled presentation of 14 sounds that are common in hospitals (for example, voice, intravenous alarm, phone, ice machine, outside traffic, and helicopter). The sounds were administered at calibrated, increasing decibel levels (40 to 70 dBA [decibels, adjusted for the range of normal hearing]) during specific sleep stages. MEASUREMENTS: Encephalographic arousals, by using established criteria, during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and non-REM (NREM) sleep stages 2 and 3. RESULTS: Sound presentations yielded arousal response curves that varied because of sound level and type and sleep stage. Electronic sounds were more arousing than other sounds, including human voices, and there were large differences in responses by sound type. As expected, sounds in NREM stage 3 were less likely to cause arousals than sounds in NREM stage 2; unexpectedly, the probability of arousal to sounds presented in REM sleep varied less by sound type than when presented in NREM sleep and caused a greater and more sustained elevation of instantaneous heart rate. LIMITATIONS: The study included only 12 participants. Results for these healthy persons may underestimate the effects of noise on sleep in patients who are hospitalized. CONCLUSION: Sounds during sleep influence both cortical brain activity and cardiovascular function. This study systematically quantifies the disruptive capacity of a range of hospital sounds on sleep, providing evidence that is essential to improving the acoustic environments of new and existing health care facilities to enable the highest quality of care. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Academy of Architecture for Health, Facilities Guidelines Institute, and The Center for Health Design.
BACKGROUND: Sleep plays a critical role in maintaining health and well-being; however, patients who are hospitalized are frequently exposed to noise that can disrupt sleep. Efforts to attenuate hospital noise have been limited by incomplete information on the interaction between sounds and sleep physiology. OBJECTIVE: To determine profiles of acoustic disruption of sleep by examining the cortical (encephalographic) arousal responses during sleep to typical hospital noises by sound level and type and sleep stage. DESIGN: 3-day polysomnographic study. SETTING: Sound-attenuated sleep laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Volunteer sample of 12 healthy participants. INTERVENTION: Baseline (sham) night followed by 2 intervention nights with controlled presentation of 14 sounds that are common in hospitals (for example, voice, intravenous alarm, phone, ice machine, outside traffic, and helicopter). The sounds were administered at calibrated, increasing decibel levels (40 to 70 dBA [decibels, adjusted for the range of normal hearing]) during specific sleep stages. MEASUREMENTS: Encephalographic arousals, by using established criteria, during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and non-REM (NREM) sleep stages 2 and 3. RESULTS: Sound presentations yielded arousal response curves that varied because of sound level and type and sleep stage. Electronic sounds were more arousing than other sounds, including human voices, and there were large differences in responses by sound type. As expected, sounds in NREM stage 3 were less likely to cause arousals than sounds in NREM stage 2; unexpectedly, the probability of arousal to sounds presented in REM sleep varied less by sound type than when presented in NREM sleep and caused a greater and more sustained elevation of instantaneous heart rate. LIMITATIONS: The study included only 12 participants. Results for these healthy persons may underestimate the effects of noise on sleep in patients who are hospitalized. CONCLUSION: Sounds during sleep influence both cortical brain activity and cardiovascular function. This study systematically quantifies the disruptive capacity of a range of hospital sounds on sleep, providing evidence that is essential to improving the acoustic environments of new and existing health care facilities to enable the highest quality of care. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Academy of Architecture for Health, Facilities Guidelines Institute, and The Center for Health Design.
Authors: Shail Rawal; Janice L Kwan; Fahad Razak; Allan S Detsky; Yishan Guo; Lauren Lapointe-Shaw; Terence Tang; Adina Weinerman; Andreas Laupacis; S V Subramanian; Amol A Verma Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Miguel Marino; Yi Li; Michael N Rueschman; J W Winkelman; J M Ellenbogen; J M Solet; Hilary Dulin; Lisa F Berkman; Orfeu M Buxton Journal: Sleep Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Melissa P Knauert; H Klar Yaggi; Nancy S Redeker; Terrence E Murphy; Katy L Araujo; Margaret A Pisani Journal: Heart Lung Date: 2014-07-12 Impact factor: 2.210
Authors: Francesco Salvo; Chiara Lonati; Michele Berardi; Andrea Riccardo Errani; Carlo Lorenzo Muzzulini; Alberto Morganti Journal: High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev Date: 2017-07-22
Authors: Mila N Grossman; Samantha L Anderson; Aelaf Worku; William Marsack; Nimit Desai; Ambrosio Tuvilleja; Jacqueline Ramos; Mary Ann Francisco; Cynthia Lafond; Jay S Balachandran; Babak Mokhlesi; Jeanne M Farnan; David O Meltzer; Vineet M Arora Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Kathryn J Crawford; Lindsey A Barnes; Thomas M Peters; Jeffrey Falk; Brian K Gehlbach Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Michael A Grandner; Natasha J Williams; Kristen L Knutson; Dorothy Roberts; Girardin Jean-Louis Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2015-02-28 Impact factor: 3.492