Identification of a dietary pattern prospectively associated with increased adiposity during childhood and adolescence.

BACKGROUND: Specific dietary risk factors for excess adiposity in young people are poorly understood. However, studies in adults suggest dietary energy density, fat and fibre are critical dietary factors.
OBJECTIVE: To examine longitudinal relationships between a dietary pattern (DP) characterised by dietary energy density, % total energy from fat and fibre density and fat mass (FM) in children from 7 to 15 years of age.
DESIGN: Subjects were 6772 children from the UK Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Dietary intake was assessed using a 3-day food diary at 7, 10 and 13 years of age. An energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre DP was identified using reduced rank regression and subjects scored for the DP at each age. FM was measured at 11, 13 and 15 years and FM index (FMI) calculated as FM/height((x)). Longitudinal models were adjusted for dietary misreporting, physical activity and maternal factors.
RESULTS: DP z-scores at all ages were positively associated with later FMI. A 1 s.d. unit increase in DP z-score was longitudinally associated with an average increase in FMI z-score of 0.04 s.d. units (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.01-0.07). For each 1 s.d. unit increase in DP z-score, the odds of being in the highest quintile for FMI (as a marker of excess adiposity) increased by 13% (95% CI, 1-27%).
CONCLUSIONS: Dietary habits during childhood are associated with increased adiposity in adolescence, with specific implications for dietary energy density, fat and fibre intake. Improving diet quality may reduce the risk of obesity in young people.

Introduction

The prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity is a major public health concern. Dietary intake is an important determinant of energy balance, but it is difficult to accurately measure energy intake (EI) in large population studies. Estimated EI is prone to dietary underreporting regardless of the dietary assessment method, but this is often overlooked. The resulting imprecision in EI measurement makes it difficult to identify associations between EI and weight gain.

By comparison, dietary composition may be more readily characterised and could influence obesity risk via its indirect effects on EI. Experimental research provides clear evidence that energy-dense diets undermine innate appetite control and are associated with greater energy consumption.[1] It has been demonstrated that innate appetite control is strongest in young children and diminishes in older children.[2] This, in combination with under-developed cognitive dietary restraint mechanisms, may make older children more susceptible to consuming energy-dense diets.[3] Energy-dense diets are typically high in fat and low in fibre. Dietary fat contributes more energy per unit weight and is metabolised at lower energetic cost than other macronutrients.[4] Fat is also less satiating relative to other macronutrients, although this may be modified by the energy density of high-fat foods.[5] Evidence supporting dietary fat in the development of obesity beyond its contribution to EI is inconclusive[6] although intervention studies demonstrate that reductions in fat intake can result in weight loss.[7] In contrast, high-fibre diets tend to be low in energy density and are associated with lower obesity risk.[8] Dietary fibre increases satiety levels[8] and this may delay or decrease subsequent EI. In 2003 the WHO identified energy-dense diets and low fibre intake as important determinants of obesity,[8] however, most of the evidence was based on studies in adults. Surprisingly few longitudinal studies have examined diet and obesity risk in children or adolescents.

To date, much of the published research on diet and obesity has focussed on single foods or nutrients. In recent decades, dietary pattern (DP) analyses have been increasingly used to consider total food intake and the potentially synergistic effects of foods and nutrients. Empirical DPs take advantage of the colinearity between dietary factors to examine their collective influence, whereas attempting to separate individual nutrient's effects may be inappropriate or their impact too small to detect.[9]

Few studies have examined DPs in relation to obesity in children or adolescents. Of these, most have applied exploratory methods such as principal components analysis or factor analysis to identify DPs. An emerging statistical method, reduced rank regression (RRR) incorporates a priori knowledge into exploratory analyses to identify DPs so that specific hypothesised pathways between dietary intake and health outcomes may be tested.

We previously identified a DP high in energy density and fat and low in fibre, using the RRR method in a subgroup from a large UK birth cohort, the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC).[10] In an analysis of 600 children, higher scores for this DP at 5 and 7 years of age were associated with a greater fat mass (FM) and increased risk of excess adiposity at 9 years.[10] The current paper extends this work by analysing follow-up to 15 years in the full ALSPAC cohort of over 6500 boys and girls. We hypothesised that the same energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre DP would be observed at 7, 10 and 13 years of age, and that this pattern would be prospectively associated with greater body fatness at 11, 13 and 15 years of age. As innate appetite control is stronger at younger ages, a second hypothesis was that the relationship between this DP and body fatness would strengthen with age.

Subjects and methods

Full details of ALSPAC have been reported elsewhere.[11] In brief, ALSPAC recruited 14 541 pregnant women residing in Avon, England with an expected delivery date between 1 April 1991 and 31 December 1992. A known birth outcome was available for 14 472 pregnancies resulting in 14 062 live births of which, 13 988 were alive at 1 year. At the 7 year follow-up an additional 548 children were recruited who were initially invited to the study but declined. Thus, the total baseline cohort is 14 536 children alive at 1 year. A range of data has been collected from the women, their partners and their children, antenatally and at regular intervals thereafter, via questionnaires and clinic visits. The number attending clinic visits at the 7, 10, 11, 13 and 15 years of age was 8297, 7563, 7159, 6147 and 5509, respectively.

Dietary assessments

A 3-day unweighed food diary was sent to child participants before clinic visits for the 7, 10 and 13 years follow-ups. Parents completed the diaries at 7 years of age, the children completed the food diary at 10 and 13 year with parental input. Respondents were requested to complete the diary over 2 weekdays and 1 weekend day (non-consecutive) and these were checked and queried with the child and parent by a nutritionist at clinic visits. The food diaries were coded and linked to food composition tables using DIDO, a programme developed at MRC Human Nutrition Research (Cambridge). Nutrient intakes were calculated using McCance and Widdowson's British food composition tables. Intakes of individual foods were combined into predefined Cambridge Food Groups used in previous analyses of ALSPAC dietary data.[10]

An individualised method was used to identify dietary misreporting, based on the ratio of EI to estimated energy requirement (EER).[12, 13] To take account of the variation in the methods used to estimate EI and EER, a 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for EI:EER.[14] Individuals were classified as plausible reporters (EI:EER within the 95% CI for EI:EER), overreporters (EI:EER >95% CI for EI:EER) or underreporters (EI:EER <95% CI EI:EER) and this was included as categorical covariate in all analyses.

Dietary patterns

RRR was applied to identify a DP characterised by dietary energy density, % energy from fat and dietary fibre density. RRR identifies patterns in a set of predictor variables that explain the maximum variation in another set of variables known as response variables, which are hypothesised to be intermediates between the predictor variables and a health outcome of interest.[15]

Using PROC PLS in SAS[16] the RRR model included all food group intakes (g per day) as predictor variables and dietary energy density, % energy from fat and fibre density as response variables. Dietary energy density (kJ g−1) was calculated as total food energy (kJ) divided by total food weight (g), excluding beverages.[17] Dietary fibre density (g MJ−1) was calculated as total g fibre (nonstarch polysaccharide) divided by total EI (MJ). The % energy from fat was calculated as g total fat multiplied by 37 kJ then divided by total EI (kJ), and multiplied by 100. Separate RRR analyses were conducted using dietary data from 7, 10 and 13 years of age, and by gender. As there were no major gender differences at any age, reported DPs are based on boys and girls combined.

The first DP from each RRR analyses explained the greatest variation in all three response variables (45%, all ages) compared with the second and third patterns, which explained ∼15% and 9%, respectively (all ages). Therefore, only the first pattern DP was considered for further analyses. This DP was positively associated with dietary energy density and % energy from fat, and negatively associated with dietary fibre density (Supplementary Table 1) and labelled an ‘energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre dietary pattern'. This pattern explained ∼64%, 51% and 20% of the variation in dietary energy density, fibre density and % energy from fat, respectively (Supplementary Table 1).

Factor loadings for the energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre DP were consistent at 7, 10 and 13 years of age (Figure 1). At all ages, the DP was most strongly characterised by low intakes of fruit and vegetables (Figure 1). At 7 years of age, over 80% of the variation in DP scores was explained by the top five and bottom five factor loadings, with fresh fruit explaining the most variation (27%), then vegetables (raw or cooked, 16%), legumes (7%), high-fibre breakfast cereal (6%), confectionery and chocolate (5%). This was similar at 10 and 13 years of age. These characteristics are almost identical to the energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre DP identified in a subset of this cohort at 5 and 7 years of age.[10]

Figure 1

Factor loadings for the energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre DP at 7, 10 and 13 years of age in the ALSPAC cohort.

Each respondent received a z-score quantifying the degree to which their reported dietary intake reflected this DP at 7, 10 and 13 years. Although a very similar energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre DP was observed in each RRR analyses, a score for exactly the same DP (based on the same covariance matrix) at 7, 10 and 13 years was required to assess longitudinal changes in z-scores for the same DP in relation to FM. Using confirmatory RRR,[18] applied DP scores were calculated at 10 and 13 years of age using scoring weights from the energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre DP identified at 7 years.

Adiposity

FM was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the 11-, 13- and 15-year follow-ups using the Lunar Prodigy DXA fan bean scanner (GE Medical Systems Lunar, Madison, WI, USA). FM index (FMI) was calculated as FM (kg) divided by height (m) raised to an optimum power (x) to remove the relation between FMI and height, that is, FM/height.[19] The optimum power (x) was calculated by regressing log (FM) on log (height).[19] As the optimum power (x) varied significantly by gender and age (boys: 5.3 at 11 years, 1.8 at 13 years, 2.4 at 15 years; girls: 4.2 at 11 years, 3.1 at 13 years and 2.4 at 15 years), FMI was calculated separately for boys and girls and at each follow-up. To allow same scale comparisons across all ages, FMI was log-transformed to obtain normal distributions and standardised to a z-score. Individuals in the top quintile (above 80th percentile) of FMI z-scores were classified as having excess adiposity.

Other variables

Height was measured at each follow-up to the nearest 0.1 cm, without shoes and socks, using a Harpenden stadiometer (Holtain Ltd, Crymmych, Pembs, UK). Weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 g with Tanita body fat analyser weighing scales (Tanita, West Drayton, Middlesex, UK). Pubertal status was self-reported at 11 and 13 years using diagrams depicting the five Tanner Stages[20] for pubic hair development as this has been reported as reliable for assessing maturation in this cohort.[21] Total physical activity was measured at the 11 and 13 years using an MTI Actigraph AM7164 2.2 accelerometer (Actigraph LLC, Fort Walton Beach, FL, USA) worn for at least 10 h per day for 3 days.[22] Total physical activity was measured as counts min−1 (cpm) averaged over the number of valid days recorded (minimum of 3 days) and log-transformed to achieve a normal distribution. Maternal education level and maternal prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) was assessed by questionnaire at 32 week's gestation.

Ethics

Parents provided written consent for their child to participate in the study. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Law and Ethics Committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees.

Statistical analyses

Descriptive analyses compared child characteristics and selected dietary intakes according to quintiles of the DP score. Analysis of variance was used to estimate mean values and trends across quintiles of the DP score adjusting for sex and age. Trends in the proportions overweight or obese (BMI) or with excess adiposity (FMI) were compared across quintiles of the DP score using a two-sided Cochrane–Armitage test.

Generalised linear models were applied to examine prospective associations between DP z-scores at 7, 10 and 13 years of age and FMI at 11, 13 and 15 years of age, respectively. All models were adjusted for dietary misreporting and exact age at the time of dietary assessment. As no interactions were observed between the DP and gender, data from boys and girls were analysed together and all models were adjusted for gender. Additional models were adjusted for physical activity and Tanner stage. Maternal education and prepregnancy BMI have been associated with obesity in the ALSPAC cohort[23] and were tested in separate models. All generalised linear models were run using PROC REG in SAS.[16]

Generalised estimating equation (GEE) models were applied to assess whether the association between DP and FMI z-scores changed with age. These longitudinal models regressed FMI on DP score at the previous time point, using DP z-scores from 7 to 13 years of age and FMI z-scores from 11 to 15 years of age. A GEE model was used to examine the odds of excess adiposity in relation to DP z-score. GEE models were run using the xtgee command in Stata with an exchangeable correlation structure.[24] All models included exact age at dietary assessment, exact age at outcome and dietary misreporting as time-varying covariates. Additional models also adjusted for physical activity and tanner stage as time-varying covariates, and maternal education and prepregnancy BMI as fixed variables. As there was no interaction between gender and DP scores, boys and girls were analysed together, adjusting for gender. To test if the strength of association (if any) between the DP and FMI varied by age, an interaction term between DP z-score and age of dietary assessment was tested in each model. The DP z-scores were also analysed in quintiles, to test if associations were linear.

Results

Mean height and FM at each follow-up showed differences between boys and girls expected with pubertal development (Table 1). With increasing age, average total FM in girls exceeded that of boys, whereas the average height of boys exceeded girls. Girls had a higher prevalence of overweight or obesity based on BMI, at all ages.

Table 1

Mean age, BMI and body composition at 7-, 11-, 13- and 15-year follow-ups

	7 years		11 years		13 years		15 years
	Boys	Girls	Boys	Girls	Boys	Girls	Boys	Girls
Age (years), N	4174	4050	3513	3629	3014	3120	2596	2905
Mean (s.d.)	7.5 (0.3)	7.5 (0.3)	11.7 (0.2)	11.8 (0.2)	13.8 (0.2)	13.8 (0.2)	15.5 (0.3)	15.5 (0.4)
Range	6.8–9.4	7.0–9.4	10.7–13.5	10.4–13.6	12.5–15.1	12.6–15.2	14.5–17.7	14.3–17.5
Fat mass (kg), N			3438	3551	2956	3067	2454	2691
Mean (s.d.)			10.4 (6.6)	13.1 (6.8)	11.1 (7.7)	16.4 (7.6)	11.4 (8.5)	19.0 (8.4)
Range			1.5–47.3	2.1–46.0	1.9–55.5	3.4–62.0	2.1–61.3	3.1–65.8
Height (cm), N	4174	4050	3496	3605	3010	3115	2572	2853
Mean (s.d.)	126 (6)	125 (6)	150 (7)	151 (7)	165 (9)	162 (6)	174 (8)	165 (6)
Range	104–153	103–157	126–179	122–177	132–196	135–184	145–200	139–190
FMIa, N			3432	3546	2955	3067	2454	2689
Mean (s.d.)			1.2 (0.7)	2.3 (1.1)	4.4 (3.0)	3.6 (1.6)	3.0 (2.2)	5.8 (2.5)
Range			0.2–5.1	0.6–8.0	0.9–19.3	0.8–12.3	0.6–16.6	1.3–18.6
Weight (kg), N	4164	4047	3500	3604	3010	3107	2568	2846
Mean (s.d.)	25.9 (4.5)	26 (5)	42.7 (9.8)	44.7 (10.4)	54.7 (11.9)	54.5 (10.8)	64.2 (12.3)	59.2 (11.2)
Range	15.6–50.8	14.0–67.2	23.2–101.6	22.6–105.4	26.6–23.8	27.4–125.4	32.3–139.0	37–122.8
BMI (kg m−2), N	4163	4047	3496	3600	3010	3107	2568	2846
Mean (s.d.)	16.1 (1.9)	16.4 (2.2)	18.8 (3.3)	19.4 (3.6)	20.0 (3.4)	20.7 (3.6)	21.0 (3.4)	21.9 (3.9)
Range	11.8–28.4	10.8–34.9	12.8–37.9	12.4–36.8	13.8–36.5	13.5–44.2	14.2–39.2	14.1–63.6
% Overweight or obeseb	12.1	17.5	21.6	24.2	18.7	21.0	17.2	19.7

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; FMI, fat mass index.

Fat mass index calculated as fat mass (kg) divided by height (m) raised to an optimum power to remove the relationship between FMI and height, which varied by year and gender (FMI is not comparable by subgroup).

Overweight or obese defined according to IOTF definitions for BMI.

Food diary data were available for 7285, 7471 and 6106 children at 7, 10 and 13 years of age, respectively. Seventy three per cent, 63% and 39% of respondents were defined as plausible reporters at 7, 10 and 13 years, respectively. An increasing score for the energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre DP at 7 years of age was associated with greater intakes of dietary energy density, % energy from fat and saturated fat, and lower fibre density, % energy from protein and carbohydrate, vitamin C and folate (Supplementary Table 2). Associations were similar at 10 and 13 years of age (data not shown).

There was an increasing trend in mean FMI and the proportion of subjects with excess adiposity at 11 years of age across quintiles of the DP score at 7 years (P-value for trend <0.001, Table 2). A weaker trend was apparent between DP scores at 10 years and FMI measured at 13 years of age. The proportion of subjects classified as overweight or obese according to BMI at 11 years of age increased across quintiles of the DP measured at 7 years (P-value for trend <0.0001, Table 2). There were no statistical or clinical differences in mean BMI across quintiles of the DP scores at any age.

Table 2

Mean BMI and fat mass index by quintiles of the energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre DP z-scores at 7, 10 and 13 years of age

	1	2	3	4	5	P-value trend
Quintiles of DP z-scores at 7 years
11 years of age
n	1144	1134	1138	1121	1099
BMI (s.e.)	18.6 (1.0)	18.6 (1.0)	18.6 (1.0)	18.7 (1.0)	19.0 (1.0)	0.01a
% Overweight or obeseb	19	22	20	22	27	<0.0001c
n	1121	1114	1115	1101	1085
FMI, z-score (s.e.)	−0.10 (0.03)	−0.08 (0.03)	−0.02 (0.03)	0.01 (0.03)	0.08 (0.03)	<0.001a
% in highest Quintile FMI	17	18	18	19	24	<0.0001c
Quintiles of DP z-scores at 10 years
13 years of age
n	1166	1161	1146	1074	1079
BMI (s.e.)	20.1 (1.0)	20.0 (1.0)	20.1 (1.0)	19.9 (1.0)	20.2 (1.0)	0.20a
% Overweight or obeseb	20	19	21	19	20	0.79c
n	1155	1146	1127	1056	1065
FMI, z-score (s.e.)	−0.06 (0.03)	−0.01 (0.03)	0.00 (0.03)	−0.04 (0.03)	0.06 (0.03)	0.05a
% in highest Quintile FMI	18	20	21	18	22	0.08c
Quintiles of DP z-scores at 13 years
15 years of age
n	1003	953	958	948	891
BMI (s.e.)	21.2 (1.0)	21.1 (1.0)	21.1 (1.0)	21.1 (1.0)	21.0 (1.0)	0.75a
% Overweight or obeseb	19	17	19	19	19	0.65c
n	975	934	946	928	879	0.52a
FMI, z-score (s.e.)	−0.02 (0.03)	−0.02 (0.03)	0.04 (0.03)	−0.01 (0.03)	−0.04 (0.03)
% in highest Quintile FMI	19	18	22	20	20	0.49c

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; DP, dietary pattern; FMI, fat mass index.

P-value from ANOVA including quintile score as continuous variable (adjusted for gender and age).

Defined using IOTF criteria for BMI.

P-value for two-sided Cochrane–Armitage trend test.

Multiple linear regression models showed that at all ages, the energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre DP was positively associated with subsequent FMI. A 1 s.d. greater z-score for the DP at 7 years of age was associated with a FMI z-score at 11 years of age that was greater on average, by 0.10 s.d. units (95% CI, 0.07–0.12) (Model 1, Table 3). A similar sized association was observed between the DP measured at 7 years and FMI z-score at 13 years (0.09, 95% CI, 0.06–0.11) and 15 years of age (0.09, 95% CI, 0.06–0.12). DP scores at 10 years of age showed similar associations with later FMI. The weakest association was observed between the DP z-score at 13 years of age and FMI at 15 years (0.03, 95% CI, 0.01–0.05). Adjusting for physical activity had no appreciable effect on these associations (Model 2, Table 3). Similarly, adjustment for pubertal development (Tanner Stage) did not make any difference to the size of these associations and was not included in final models owing to low response rates.[21] Adjustment for maternal education and prepregnancy BMI attenuated some associations, however, this appeared important only for the relationship between DP scores at 13 years and FMI at 15 years (Model 3, Table 3). Both plausible dietary reporting and overreporting was associated with a lower FMI z-score compared with dietary underreporting.

Table 3

Prospective associations between an energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre DP (z-score) and fat mass index (z-score)

Dietary pattern	FMI z-score	FMI z-score	FMI z-score
Age	11 years	13 years	15 years
7 years
Model 1
n	5501	4904	4245
Beta (s.e.)	0.10 (0.01)	0.09 (0.01)	0.09 (0.01)
P-value	<0.0001	<0.0001	<0.0001
95% CI	0.07–0.12	0.06–0.11	0.06–0.12
Model 2
n	4630	3983	3495
Beta (s.e.)	0.09 (0.01)	0.09 (0.02)	0.09 (0.02)
P-value	<0.0001	<0.0001	<0.0001
95% CI	0.07–0.12	0.06–0.11	0.06–0.12
Model 3
n	4002	3472	2626
Beta (s.e.)	0.07 (0.01)	0.06 (0.02)	0.06 (0.02)
P-value	<0.0001	0.0001	0.0004
95% CI	0.05–0.10	0.03–0.09	0.03–0.10
10 years
Model 1
n	6356	5527	4736
Beta (s.e.)	0.06 (0.01)	0.06 (0.01)	0.06 (0.01)
P-value	<0.0001	<0.0001	<0.0001
95% CI	0.05–0.08	0.04–0.08	0.04–0.09
Model 2
n	5344	4560	3953
Beta (s.e.)	0.06 (0.01)	0.07 (0.01)	0.06 (0.01)
P-value	<0.0001	<0.0001	<0.0001
95% CI	0.04–0.08	0.04–0.09	0.03–0.08
Model 3
n	4571	3943	3425
Beta (s.e.)	0.03 (0.01)	0.04 (0.01)	0.03 (0.01)
P-value	0.005	0.002	0.023
95% CI	0.01–0.05	0.01–0.06	0.01–0.06
13 years
Model 1
n			4656
Beta (s.e.)			0.03 (0.01)
P-value			0.003
95% CI			0.01–0.05
Model 2
n			3479
Beta (s.e.)			0.03 (0.01)
P-value			0.01
95% CI			0.01–0.05
Model 3
n			3005
Beta (s.e.)			0.01 (0.01)
P-value			0.348
95% CI			−0.01 to 0.03

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FMI, fat mass index.

Model 1: linear regression adjusted for age at dietary assessment, dietary misreporting and sex

Model 2: as model 1, plus adjustment for total physical activity at 11 years.

Model 3: as model 2, plus adjustment for maternal education and maternal prepregnancy BMI.

The longitudinal analyses modelling change in DP and FMI z-scores (6772 individuals) adjusting for age, sex and dietary misreporting indicated that on average, a 1 s.d. unit increase in DP z-score between dietary assessments was associated with an increase in FMI z-score of 0.04 s.d. units (95% CI, 0.01–0.07). For each increasing year of age, the change in FMI z-score associated with a 1 s.d. increase in DP z-score reduced by 0.003 (95% CI, −0.005 to 0.0001, P-value for interaction=0.06).

With each increase in quintile for the DP z-score between dietary assessments there was an increasing trend in FMI z-score (P for trend=0.01) (Figure 2). Respondents in the highest DP quintile had a FMI z-score that was on average, 0.13 s.d. units (95% CI, 0.03–0.22) higher than those in the lowest quintile. For each increasing year of age, the change in FMI z-score associated with a one quintile increase in DP z-score attenuated by 0.002 s.d. units (95% CI −0.004 to 0.0004, P-value for interaction=0.10).

Figure 2

Average change in FMI z-score associated with change in quintile of the energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre DP z-score. Average change in FMI z-score (beta coefficient) associated with an increase in DP quintile between dietary assessments, relative to 1st quintile. Adjusted for age at dietary assessment, age at outcome, dietary misreporting and gender. Error bars are 95% CI for beta coefficient. P-value for trend=0.01.

Higher scores for the energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre DP were positively associated with greater odds of excess adiposity. For each 1 s.d. unit increase in DP z-score between dietary assessments, the odds increased by 13% (OR 95% CI, 1–27%). There was little evidence of an interaction between DP z-score and age of dietary assessment (P=0.20). Quintile analyses indicated an increasing trend between DP z-scores and the odds of excess adiposity; with each increase in DP quintile between dietary assessments, there was a 5% increase in odds (OR 95% CI, 3–8%). Compared with those respondents in the lowest quintile for the DP score, those in the highest quintile had a 22% higher odds of excess adiposity (OR 95% CI, 10–35%) (Figure 3). There was no interaction between DP score quintile and age at dietary assessment (P=0.53).

Figure 3

Odds of excess adiposity according to change in quintile of the energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre DP z-score. Odds of excess adiposity associated with an increase in DP quintile between dietary assessments, relative to 1st quintile. Adjusted for age at dietary assessment, age at outcome, dietary misreporting and gender. Error bars are 95% CI for odds ratio. P-value for trend <0.001.

In all longitudinal models, physical activity and maternal education were negative predictors and maternal prepregnancy BMI was a positive predictor of FMI and excess adiposity. However, including these covariates in the GEE models made little or no difference to the reported associations (not shown but available from author on request).

The DP z-score is calculated using a weighted linear combination of all food group intakes. For example, in a 13-year-old female, substituting two slices (50 g per day) of high-fibre bread with low-fibre bread, 50 g per day of high-fibre breakfast cereal with low-fibre breakfast cereal and replacing 60 g per day vegetables with fried potato while keeping all other food intake constant, would result in a 1 s.d. unit increase in DP z-score.

Discussion

This longitudinal study of UK children and adolescents followed from 7 to 15 years of age confirms that an energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre DP is prospectively associated with greater levels of adiposity and excess adiposity. This implicates dietary energy density, fat and fibre intake as specific risk factors in the development of obesity during childhood and adolescence, and supports similar findings observed between 5 and 9 years of age in the same cohort.[10]

There were clear trends between higher scores for this type of DP and increased adiposity, across all ages. However, scores for the energy-dense, high-fat, low-fibre DP at 7 years of age showed a slightly stronger association with later adiposity than scores for the same pattern at 13 years of age. This finding did not support our hypothesis that the strength of association would increase with age, reflecting a decline in innate appetite control mechanisms. It may, however, reflect increasing levels of dietary measurement error with age of the study child. In this study, the prevalence of dietary misreporting increased with age and was most prevalent at 13 years of age. Respondents were likely to receive less assistance from a parent or guardian to complete their food diary at 13 years of age, and this may have led to a greater number of inaccuracies. Another contributing factor may be greater competing influences on an adolescent's adiposity at 13 years relative to younger ages, such as sedentary behaviours, smoking and alcohol use, which were not examined in this study.

There have been surprisingly few longitudinal studies on dietary intake and obesity in children or adolescents. Although some cross-sectional studies have examined individual foods or nutrients, for example, energy density, in relation to obesity in children, the findings have been inconsistent and frequently null.[25] The current analysis and our previous analysis of ALSPAC participants between the ages of 5 and 9 years[10] are the only studies, to our knowledge, that have examined RRR-derived DPs longitudinally in relation to adiposity in children and adolescents.

Two prospective studies have examined DPs derived using principal components analysis in relation to obesity in adolescents. A Norwegian study did not observe any prospective associations between four DPs and BMI in 9–10 years old over a 4-year follow-up.[26] However, this study did not measure changes in scores for the exactly the same DPs, which may partly explain the lack of associations. In the US Project EAT study, there were no consistent prospective associations observed between ‘vegetable', ‘fruit', ‘starchy food' or ‘sweet and salty snack food' patterns and overweight or obesity according to BMI 5 years later.[27] BMI was based on self-reported height and weight, and DP scores were measured once only (at baseline).

Like most cohort studies, the ALSPAC study population was slightly more affluent than the national average and included a smaller number of women from ethnic minorities. However, ALSPAC children showed almost identical growth standards to those for Britain as a whole.[28] There was some attrition in the study population over time and there may be some bias among those attending follow-ups compared with those who did not. However, this analysis included over 6500 children and all available data were analysed rather than focussing on only those children who completed all follow-ups, reducing bias to some degree. Although we attempted to control for the other influences on children's diets, residual confounding cannot be ruled out.

This study has several major strengths. Data were collected approximately every 2 years, enabling a longitudinal analysis spanning 7–15 years of age. The use of 3-day food diaries provides detailed characterisation of dietary intake and avoids reliance on dietary recall. We attempted to adjust for dietary misreporting using an individualised method. The use of RRR enabled a specific DP to be examined; one hypothesised to have a relationship with adiposity on the basis of its energy density, fat and fibre content. RRR also has the advantage of considering all three of these dietary factors simultaneously in the form of a DP. The use of confirmatory RRR in this study provided repeated measures of exactly the same DP that could be modelled over time. Adiposity was assessed using direct measures of FM rather than BMI. Finally, the observed associations between the DP and adiposity in this study were independent of physical activity measured objectively with accelerometers, whereas most other studies have relied on physical activity questionnaires.

In conclusion, this analysis of UK children indicates that a DP that is high in energy density, high in fat and low in fibre is prospectively associated with greater adiposity in childhood and adolescence. This provides important information for interventions and policy in the area of obesity prevention in young people.