Literature DB >> 22868479

Urinary creatinine concentrations in an industrial workforce and comparison with reference values of the general population.

Michael Bader1, Peter Messerer, Wolfgang Will.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Urinary creatinine is an important parameter for the adjustment of metabolite concentrations in differently diluted urine specimens, as a reference dimension for biological limit or guidance values and as a selection criterion for spot urine samples in human biomonitoring. While the creatinine output of the general population has been well described in environmental surveys, this study focused specifically on creatinine concentrations in a large industrial workforce in order to compare these data with the general population and to provide a database for the calculation of a reasonable conversion factor between volume-related and creatinine-adjusted data and vice versa.
METHODS: Urinary creatinine was analysed in 6,438 spot urine samples by a photometric assay in the time period between 1989 and 2009. Basic demographic data (age, sex, body weight, body height) and job category (apprentices, skilled craftsmen, skilled chemical workers, foremen, laboratory staff and executives) were considered in a statistical analysis.
RESULTS: The median concentration of urinary creatinine in all urine samples was 1.36 g/L with male employees showing significantly higher values (1.37 g/L, n = 6,148 samples) than female employees (1.00 g/L, n = 290) and concentrations ranging from 0.01 up to 9.76 g/L. Age, body mass index and job category were significant influence factors on urinary creatinine. About 92 % of all samples showed creatinine concentrations between 0.3 and 3.0 g/L, a range recommended by the World Health Organization as a criterion for valid spot urine samples. DISCUSSION: The results of this study correspond well with data from environmental surveys and with recent data from an active workforce in industry with similar sampling strategies. Therefore, a median of 1.4 g creatinine per litre urine seems to be a reasonable value for general calculations and adjustments. The study data also support the validity of the current recommendations by the WHO and several scientific committees and institutions with respect to creatinine limits in spot urine samples for occupational-medical biomonitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22868479     DOI: 10.1007/s00420-012-0802-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health        ISSN: 0340-0131            Impact factor:   3.015


  7 in total

1.  Creatinine adjustment of biological monitoring results.

Authors:  J Cocker; H J Mason; N D Warren; R J Cotton
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.611

2.  Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine.

Authors:  D W Cockcroft; M H Gault
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.847

3.  Effect of creatinine and specific gravity normalization on urinary biomarker 1,6-hexamethylene diamine.

Authors:  Linda G T Gaines; Kenneth W Fent; Sheila L Flack; Jennifer M Thomasen; Louise M Ball; Haibo Zhou; Stephen G Whittaker; Leena A Nylander-French
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2010-02-10

4.  Reliability of urinary creatinine as a parameter used to adjust values of urinary biological indicators.

Authors:  L Alessio; A Berlin; A Dell'Orto; F Toffoletto; I Ghezzi
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.015

5.  Validation of urine density correction in cases of hippuric acid and un-metabolized toluene in urine of workers exposed to toluene.

Authors:  Toshio Kawai; Yoko Eitaki; Hirohiko Ukai; Osamu Inoue; Yuki Maeshima; Naohiro Ueda; Fumiko Ohashi; Haruhiko Sakurai; Masayuki Ikeda
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.179

6.  GC-MS determination of creatinine in human biological fluids as pentafluorobenzyl derivative in clinical studies and biomonitoring: Inter-laboratory comparison in urine with Jaffé, HPLC and enzymatic assays.

Authors:  Dimitrios Tsikas; Alexander Wolf; Anja Mitschke; Frank-Mathias Gutzki; Wolfgang Will; Michael Bader
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 3.205

7.  Urinary creatinine concentrations in the U.S. population: implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements.

Authors:  Dana B Barr; Lynn C Wilder; Samuel P Caudill; Amanda J Gonzalez; Lance L Needham; James L Pirkle
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Urinary trace element concentrations in environmental settings: is there a value for systematic creatinine adjustment or do we introduce a bias?

Authors:  Perrine Hoet; Gladys Deumer; Alfred Bernard; Dominique Lison; Vincent Haufroid
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.563

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.