AIMS: To describe socioeconomic characteristics of participants and their effect on uptake and completion of the implementation project (FIN-D2D) for the National Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Programme. Furthermore, to assess the effectiveness of individual vs. group intervention during one-year follow-up. METHODS: At baseline, 2820 men and 5764 women aged <65 years participated in the non-randomized implementation project in primary health care setting; one-year follow-up was available for 1067 men and 2122 women. Socioeconomic status included education and occupation. Interventions were individual and/or group-based. The changes in cardiovascular risk factors and glucose tolerance were used as measures of the effectiveness of intervention. RESULTS: 68.4% of the men and 69.8% of the women participated in some of the intervention modalities offered. Low education and not working were related to active participation in the intervention in men. 88.2% of men and 76.1% of women selected the individual instead of group intervention. The effectiveness of individual vs. group interventions did not differ, except for minor changes in systolic blood pressure in women and glucose tolerance in men. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic status modulated participation in interventions. Both types of intervention worked equally well, but participation in group intervention was low.
AIMS: To describe socioeconomic characteristics of participants and their effect on uptake and completion of the implementation project (FIN-D2D) for the National Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Programme. Furthermore, to assess the effectiveness of individual vs. group intervention during one-year follow-up. METHODS: At baseline, 2820 men and 5764 women aged <65 years participated in the non-randomized implementation project in primary health care setting; one-year follow-up was available for 1067 men and 2122 women. Socioeconomic status included education and occupation. Interventions were individual and/or group-based. The changes in cardiovascular risk factors and glucose tolerance were used as measures of the effectiveness of intervention. RESULTS: 68.4% of the men and 69.8% of the women participated in some of the intervention modalities offered. Low education and not working were related to active participation in the intervention in men. 88.2% of men and 76.1% of women selected the individual instead of group intervention. The effectiveness of individual vs. group interventions did not differ, except for minor changes in systolic blood pressure in women and glucose tolerance in men. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic status modulated participation in interventions. Both types of intervention worked equally well, but participation in group intervention was low.
Authors: Ethan M Balk; Amy Earley; Gowri Raman; Esther A Avendano; Anastassios G Pittas; Patrick L Remington Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Klaas H J Ultee; Elke K M Tjeertes; Frederico Bastos Gonçalves; Ellen V Rouwet; Anton G M Hoofwijk; Robert Jan Stolker; Hence J M Verhagen; Sanne E Hoeks Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: I van den Berg; S Buettner; R R J Coebergh van den Braak; K H J Ultee; H F Lingsma; J L A van Vugt; J N M Ijzermans Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Aleksandra Gilis-Januszewska; Jaana Lindström; Noël C Barengo; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Peter Eh Schwarz; Ewa Wójtowicz; Beata Piwońska-Solska; Zbigniew Szybiński; Adam Windak; Alicja Hubalewska-Dydejczyk Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 1.889