Literature DB >> 22868007

Participation, socioeconomic status and group or individual counselling intervention in individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes: one-year follow-up study of the FIN-D2D-project.

Nina Rautio1, Jari Jokelainen, Heikki Oksa, Timo Saaristo, Markku Peltonen, Leo Niskanen, Juha Saltevo, Eeva Korpi-Hyövälti, Matti Uusitupa, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi.   

Abstract

AIMS: To describe socioeconomic characteristics of participants and their effect on uptake and completion of the implementation project (FIN-D2D) for the National Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Programme. Furthermore, to assess the effectiveness of individual vs. group intervention during one-year follow-up.
METHODS: At baseline, 2820 men and 5764 women aged <65 years participated in the non-randomized implementation project in primary health care setting; one-year follow-up was available for 1067 men and 2122 women. Socioeconomic status included education and occupation. Interventions were individual and/or group-based. The changes in cardiovascular risk factors and glucose tolerance were used as measures of the effectiveness of intervention.
RESULTS: 68.4% of the men and 69.8% of the women participated in some of the intervention modalities offered. Low education and not working were related to active participation in the intervention in men. 88.2% of men and 76.1% of women selected the individual instead of group intervention. The effectiveness of individual vs. group interventions did not differ, except for minor changes in systolic blood pressure in women and glucose tolerance in men.
CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic status modulated participation in interventions. Both types of intervention worked equally well, but participation in group intervention was low.
Copyright © 2012 Primary Care Diabetes Europe. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22868007     DOI: 10.1016/j.pcd.2012.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prim Care Diabetes        ISSN: 1878-0210            Impact factor:   2.459


  5 in total

Review 1.  Combined Diet and Physical Activity Promotion Programs to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes Among Persons at Increased Risk: A Systematic Review for the Community Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Ethan M Balk; Amy Earley; Gowri Raman; Esther A Avendano; Anastassios G Pittas; Patrick L Remington
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  The relation between household income and surgical outcome in the Dutch setting of equal access to and provision of healthcare.

Authors:  Klaas H J Ultee; Elke K M Tjeertes; Frederico Bastos Gonçalves; Ellen V Rouwet; Anton G M Hoofwijk; Robert Jan Stolker; Hence J M Verhagen; Sanne E Hoeks
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Low Socioeconomic Status Is Associated with Worse Outcomes After Curative Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Results from a Large, Multicenter Study.

Authors:  I van den Berg; S Buettner; R R J Coebergh van den Braak; K H J Ultee; H F Lingsma; J L A van Vugt; J N M Ijzermans
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Progress of the Healthier You: NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme: referrals, uptake and participant characteristics.

Authors:  E Barron; R Clark; R Hewings; J Smith; J Valabhji
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 4.359

5.  Predictors of completing a primary health care diabetes prevention intervention programme in people at high risk of type 2 diabetes: Experiences of the DE-PLAN project.

Authors:  Aleksandra Gilis-Januszewska; Jaana Lindström; Noël C Barengo; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Peter Eh Schwarz; Ewa Wójtowicz; Beata Piwońska-Solska; Zbigniew Szybiński; Adam Windak; Alicja Hubalewska-Dydejczyk
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.889

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.