Literature DB >> 22867808

Dimensional stability of contemporary irreversible hydrocolloids: humidor versus wet tissue storage.

Christina Erbe1, Sabine Ruf, Bernd Wöstmann, Markus Balkenhol.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The storage time and conditions of irreversible hydrocolloid impressions affect their accuracy and in turn the precision of the definitive cast. Recommendations for proper storage are, however, based on theoretical assumptions rather than facts.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of the 2 most common storage conditions on the dimensional stability of 7 contemporary irreversible hydrocolloids (IH) for a period of up to 7 days.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve specimens per material (Blueprint, Cavex CA37, Cavex ColorChange, Jeltrate, Orthoprint, Cavex Orthotrace, and Tetrachrom) were fabricated according to ISO/CD 21563. The specimens were either stored in a humidor (n=6) or wrapped in a wet tissue (n=6) inside a plastic bag (bag/tissue). The linear dimensional change of the specimens was calculated (Δ| [%]) at baseline and after a storage time of 1, 2, 4, 24, 48, 72, 120, and 168 hours. Data were subjected to a repeated measures ANOVA, followed by post hoc comparisons (Tukey HSD Test, Games-Howell Test) at α=.05.
RESULTS: For specimens stored in the humidor, Δ| ranged from 0.33% to -2.35% and in the bag/tissue from 2.89% to -2.8%. Storage in the bag/tissue resulted in the most unpredictable results. The color-changing IH showed a pronounced expansion when stored in the bag/tissue.
CONCLUSIONS: If humidor storage is used, IH impressions should be poured within 4 hours. If bag/tissue storage is used, noncolor-change IH impressions should, preferably, be poured within 2 hours. In general, the color-change IHs studied had higher dimensional change values. For optimum dimensional stability, IH impressions should be poured as soon as possible.
Copyright © 2012 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22867808     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60117-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  6 in total

1.  Precision of guided scanning procedures for full-arch digital impressions in vivo.

Authors:  Moritz Zimmermann; Christina Koller; Moritz Rumetsch; Andreas Ender; Albert Mehl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Effect of storage time of extended-pour and conventional alginate impressions on dimensional accuracy of casts.

Authors:  Ahmad Rohanian; Ghasem Ommati Shabestari; Somayeh Zeighami; Mohammad Javad Samadi; Ahmad Reza Shamshiri
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2014-11-30

3.  Effect of Storage Time and Temperature on Dimensional Stability of Impressions Made with Zinc Oxide Impression Paste.

Authors:  Sareh Habibzadeh; Shima Safaeian; Marjan Behruzibakhsh; Parisa Kaviyani; Mohamadjavad Kharazifard
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2016-06

4.  Surface Detail Reproduction and Dimensional Stability of Contemporary Irreversible Hydrocolloid Alternatives after Immediate and Delayed Pouring.

Authors:  Preethi Kusugal; Ritu Sunil Chourasiya; Zarir Ruttonji; Preeti Astagi; Ajay Kumar Nayak; Abhishekha Patil
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

5.  Accuracy of intraoral scans in the mixed dentition: a prospective non-randomized comparative clinical trial.

Authors:  Konrad Liczmanski; Thomas Stamm; Cristina Sauerland; Moritz Blanck-Lubarsch
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Evaluation of digital dental models obtained from dental cone-beam computed tomography scan of alginate impressions.

Authors:  Tingting Jiang; Sang-Mi Lee; Yanan Hou; Xin Chang; Hyeon-Shik Hwang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 1.372

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.