Literature DB >> 22867295

A comparison of four telephone-based counseling styles for recovering stimulant users.

David Farabee1, Sarah J Cousins, Mary-Lynn Brecht, Valerie P Antonini, Anne B Lee, Julie Brummer, Jordana Hemberg, Mitchell Karno, Richard A Rawson.   

Abstract

The continuing development and refinement of empirically supported interventions to increase participation in posttreatment care and promote sustained abstinence from illicit drug use is a priority for the addictions field. The purpose of this study was to assess the combined and relative effectiveness of four types of counseling styles, delivered by telephone, relative to a no call control condition. Stimulant users (N = 302) were randomized to one of four low-cost, telephone support protocols (unstructured/nondirective, unstructured/directive, structured/nondirective, structured/directive) or a standard referral to aftercare without telephone counseling (control). All of the study participants were nearing the completion of (or had completed) an intensive phase of structured, outpatient stimulant abuse treatment. Drug use and aftercare participation were assessed at 3 and 12 months following randomization. Intent-to-treat analyses showed no significant time-by-group interactions for these primary outcomes. Subsequent analyses, however, revealed a significant difference between the aggregated call groups and the control group at the time of the 3-month follow-up. The mean ASI drug use severity composite score for subjects in the call conditions declining from .058 at baseline to .048 at 3 months, whereas the no call/control group average score increased from .053 to .062 (χ (1) = 4.95, p = .026). A similar-and slightly stronger-effect was found when the study sample was restricted to those reporting any use during the month prior to the baseline interview (n = 152). This study provides modest support for the telephone-based counseling approaches strategies examined in this project. Subsequent research will assess interactions between patient characteristics and counseling styles, and improved identification of which treatment graduates might be more likely to benefit from this type of continuing support. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22867295      PMCID: PMC3500433          DOI: 10.1037/a0029572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav        ISSN: 0893-164X


  13 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of continuing care interventions for substance abusers. Implications for the study of long-term treatment effects.

Authors:  J R McKay
Journal:  Eval Rev       Date:  2001-04

2.  Adoption of drug avoidance activities among patients in contingency management and cognitive-behavioral treatments.

Authors:  David Farabee; Richard Rawson; Michael McCann
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2002-12

3.  Less directiveness by therapists improves drinking outcomes of reactant clients in alcoholism treatment.

Authors:  Mitchell P Karno; Richard Longabaugh
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2005-04

4.  Using conceptual matrices, knowledge maps, and scripted cooperation to improve personal management strategies.

Authors:  S M Dees; D F Dansereau; J L Peel; J G Boatler; K Knight
Journal:  J Drug Educ       Date:  1991

5.  Self-reported drug use among recently admitted jail inmates: estimating prevalence and treatment needs.

Authors:  D Farabee; E Fredlund
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.164

6.  An experimental test of telephone aftercare contacts with alcoholics.

Authors:  J L Fitzgerald; H A Mulford
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1985-09

7.  Drug abuse treatment retention and process effects on follow-up outcomes.

Authors:  D D Simpson; G W Joe; G A Rowan-Szal
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  1997-09-25       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Interactions between psychotherapy procedures and patient attributes that predict alcohol treatment effectiveness: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Mitchell P Karno; Larry E Beutler; T Mark Harwood
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  What do we know? Process analysis and the search for a better understanding of Project MATCH's anger-by-treatment matching effect.

Authors:  Mitchell P Karno; Richard Longabaugh
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  2004-07

Review 10.  Continuing care research: what we have learned and where we are going.

Authors:  James R McKay
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2009-03
View more
  5 in total

1.  The Use of New Communications Technologies to Evaluate and Intervene in Substance Use Disorders.

Authors:  James R McKay
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2014-06-20

2.  Recovery Support for Adolescents with Substance use Disorders: The Impact of Recovery Support Telephone Calls Provided by Pre-Professional Volunteers.

Authors:  Bryan R Garner; Mark D Godley; Lora L Passetti; Rodney R Funk; William L White
Journal:  J Subst Abus Alcohol       Date:  2014-04

3.  Patient reactance moderates the effect of directive telephone counseling for methamphetamine users.

Authors:  Mitchell Karno; David Farabee; Mary-Lynn Brecht; Richard Rawson
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.582

4.  An analysis of relapse prevention factors and their ability to predict sustained abstinence following treatment completion.

Authors:  David Farabee; Michael McCann; Mary-Lynn Brecht; Sarah J Cousins; Valerie P Antonini; Anne B Lee; Jordana Hemberg; Mitch Karno; Richard A Rawson
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2013 May-Jun

5.  Who benefits from additional drug counseling among prescription opioid-dependent patients receiving buprenorphine-naloxone and standard medical management?

Authors:  Roger D Weiss; Margaret L Griffin; Jennifer Sharpe Potter; Dorian R Dodd; Jessica A Dreifuss; Hilary S Connery; Kathleen M Carroll
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 4.492

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.