Literature DB >> 22866762

When humanoid robots become human-like interaction partners: corepresentation of robotic actions.

Anna Stenzel1, Eris Chinellato2, Maria A Tirado Bou3, Ángel P Del Pobil3, Markus Lappe1, Roman Liepelt1.   

Abstract

In human-human interactions, corepresenting a partner's actions is crucial to successfully adjust and coordinate actions with others. Current research suggests that action corepresentation is restricted to interactions between human agents facilitating social interaction with conspecifics. In this study, we investigated whether action corepresentation, as measured by the social Simon effect (SSE), is present when we share a task with a real humanoid robot. Further, we tested whether the believed humanness of the robot's functional principle modulates the extent to which robotic actions are corepresented. We described the robot to participants either as functioning in a biologically inspired human-like way or in a purely deterministic machine-like manner. The SSE was present in the human-like but not in the machine-like robot condition. These findings suggest that humans corepresent the actions of nonbiological robotic agents when they start to attribute human-like cognitive processes to the robot. Our findings provide novel evidence for top-down modulation effects on action corepresentation in human-robot interaction situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22866762     DOI: 10.1037/a0029493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  30 in total

1.  Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.

Authors:  Bibiana Klempova; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-04-02

2.  Social learning of action-effect associations: Modulation of action control following observation of virtual action's effects.

Authors:  Kathleen Belhassein; Peter J Marshall; Arnaud Badets; Cédric A Bouquet
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Action prediction modulates self-other integration in joint action.

Authors:  Anouk van der Weiden; Emanuele Porcu; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-05-04

4.  Reaction time coupling in a joint stimulus-response task: A matter of functional actions or likable agents?

Authors:  Zoe Schielen; Julia Verhaegh; Chris Dijkerman; Marnix Naber
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 5.  Sociomotor action control.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde; Lisa Weller; Roland Pfister
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

6.  No evidence of task co-representation in a joint Stroop task.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; David Melcher; Wieske van Zoest
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-08-29

7.  Number to me, space to you: Joint representation of spatial-numerical associations.

Authors:  Stefania D'Ascenzo; Martin H Fischer; Samuel Shaki; Luisa Lugli
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-11-23

8.  Visual experience determines the use of external reference frames in joint action control.

Authors:  Thomas Dolk; Roman Liepelt; Wolfgang Prinz; Katja Fiehler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The joint flanker effect: less social than previously thought.

Authors:  Thomas Dolk; Bernhard Hommel; Wolfgang Prinz; Roman Liepelt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-10

10.  Exploring social influences on the joint Simon task: empathy and friendship.

Authors:  Ruth M Ford; Bradley Aberdein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.