OBJECTIVE: To identify key principles for establishing a national clinical decision support (CDS) knowledge sharing framework. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of an initiative by the US Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) to establish a framework for national CDS knowledge sharing, key stakeholders were identified. Stakeholders' viewpoints were obtained through surveys and in-depth interviews, and findings and relevant insights were summarized. Based on these insights, key principles were formulated for establishing a national CDS knowledge sharing framework. RESULTS: Nineteen key stakeholders were recruited, including six executives from electronic health record system vendors, seven executives from knowledge content producers, three executives from healthcare provider organizations, and three additional experts in clinical informatics. Based on these stakeholders' insights, five key principles were identified for effectively sharing CDS knowledge nationally. These principles are (1) prioritize and support the creation and maintenance of a national CDS knowledge sharing framework; (2) facilitate the development of high-value content and tooling, preferably in an open-source manner; (3) accelerate the development or licensing of required, pragmatic standards; (4) acknowledge and address medicolegal liability concerns; and (5) establish a self-sustaining business model. DISCUSSION: Based on the principles identified, a roadmap for national CDS knowledge sharing was developed through the ONC's Advancing CDS initiative. CONCLUSION: The study findings may serve as a useful guide for ongoing activities by the ONC and others to establish a national framework for sharing CDS knowledge and improving clinical care.
OBJECTIVE: To identify key principles for establishing a national clinical decision support (CDS) knowledge sharing framework. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As part of an initiative by the US Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) to establish a framework for national CDS knowledge sharing, key stakeholders were identified. Stakeholders' viewpoints were obtained through surveys and in-depth interviews, and findings and relevant insights were summarized. Based on these insights, key principles were formulated for establishing a national CDS knowledge sharing framework. RESULTS: Nineteen key stakeholders were recruited, including six executives from electronic health record system vendors, seven executives from knowledge content producers, three executives from healthcare provider organizations, and three additional experts in clinical informatics. Based on these stakeholders' insights, five key principles were identified for effectively sharing CDS knowledge nationally. These principles are (1) prioritize and support the creation and maintenance of a national CDS knowledge sharing framework; (2) facilitate the development of high-value content and tooling, preferably in an open-source manner; (3) accelerate the development or licensing of required, pragmatic standards; (4) acknowledge and address medicolegal liability concerns; and (5) establish a self-sustaining business model. DISCUSSION: Based on the principles identified, a roadmap for national CDS knowledge sharing was developed through the ONC's Advancing CDS initiative. CONCLUSION: The study findings may serve as a useful guide for ongoing activities by the ONC and others to establish a national framework for sharing CDS knowledge and improving clinical care.
Authors: Diane Montella; Steven H Brown; Peter L Elkin; James C Jackson; S Trent Rosenbloom; Dietlind Wahner-Roedler; Gail Welsh; Bryan Cotton; Oscar D Guillamondegui; Henry Lew; Katherine H Taber; Larry A Tupler; Rodney Vanderploeg; Theodore Speroff Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2011-10-22
Authors: Damian Borbolla; Carlos Otero; David F Lobach; Kensaku Kawamoto; Ana M Gomez Saldaño; Gustavo Staccia; Gastón Lopez; Silvana Figar; Daniel Luna; Fernan Gonzalez Bernaldo de Quiros Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform Date: 2010
Authors: Matvey B Palchuk; Michael Klumpenaar; Tarang Jatkar; Ralph J Zottola; William G Adams; Aaron H Abend Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2010-11-13
Authors: Adam Wright; Dean F Sittig; Joan S Ash; Joshua Feblowitz; Seth Meltzer; Carmit McMullen; Ken Guappone; Jim Carpenter; Joshua Richardson; Linas Simonaitis; R Scott Evans; W Paul Nichol; Blackford Middleton Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-03-17 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Dean F Sittig; Adam Wright; Seth Meltzer; Linas Simonaitis; R Scott Evans; W Paul Nichol; Joan S Ash; Blackford Middleton Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Zihao Yan; Ronilda Lacson; Ivan Ip; Vladimir Valtchinov; Ali Raja; David Osterbur; Ramin Khorasani Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2017-02-10
Authors: Joan S Ash; Dean F Sittig; Carmit K McMullen; Adam Wright; Arwen Bunce; Vishnu Mohan; Deborah J Cohen; Blackford Middleton Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2015-04-24 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: David Hawig; Chao Zhou; Sebastian Fuhrhop; Andre S Fialho; Navin Ramachandran Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-06-14 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Jeritt G Thayer; Daria F Ferro; Jeffrey M Miller; Dean Karavite; Robert W Grundmeier; Levon Utidjian; Joseph J Zorc Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jamie J Coleman; Heleen van der Sijs; Walter E Haefeli; Sarah P Slight; Sarah E McDowell; Hanna M Seidling; Birgit Eiermann; Jos Aarts; Elske Ammenwerth; Ann Slee; Robin E Ferner; Robin E Ferner; Ann Slee Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 2.796