Literature DB >> 22865307

Beta-blocker use is not associated with slow flow during rotational atherectomy.

Kenichi Sakakura1, Junya Ako, Hiroshi Wada, Ryo Naito, Kenshiro Arao, Hiroshi Funayama, Norifumi Kubo, Shin-ichi Momomura.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between beta-blocker use and slow flow during rotational atherectomy (RA).
BACKGROUND: RA is often performed as part of percutaneous coronary interventions for the treatment of calcified lesions; however, the procedure can be complicated by slow flow. Previous reports suggested that the use of beta-blockers was associated with slow flow during RA.
METHODS: A total of 186 patients who received RA were included, and 87 patients were on beta-blockers. The occurrence of slow flow was compared between the beta-blocker group (n = 87) and the non-beta-blocker group (n = 99). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate whether the use of beta-blockers was associated with slow flow.
RESULTS: The occurrence of slow flow was not different between the beta-blocker group (29.9%) and the non-beta-blocker group (24.2%; P=.39). The use of beta-blockers was not significantly associated with slow flow (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-1.68; P=.49) after controlling for all potential confounding factors.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no definitive association between slow flow and the use of beta-blockers during RA. There is no need to discontinue beta-blockers in patients receiving RA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22865307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol        ISSN: 1042-3931            Impact factor:   2.022


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of mid-term clinical outcomes between on-label and off-label use of rotational atherectomy.

Authors:  Takayuki Mori; Kenichi Sakakura; Hiroshi Wada; Yousuke Taniguchi; Kei Yamamoto; Yusuke Adachi; Hiroshi Funayama; Shin-Ichi Momomura; Hideo Fujita
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Comparison of the incidence of slow flow after rotational atherectomy with IVUS-crossable versus IVUS-uncrossable calcified lesions.

Authors:  Kenichi Sakakura; Yousuke Taniguchi; Kei Yamamoto; Takunori Tsukui; Masaru Seguchi; Hiroshi Wada; Shin-Ichi Momomura; Hideo Fujita
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Comparison of complications with a 1.25-mm versus a 1.5-mm burr for severely calcified lesions that could not be crossed by an intravascular ultrasound catheter.

Authors:  Kenichi Sakakura; Yousuke Taniguchi; Kei Yamamoto; Takunori Tsukui; Masaru Seguchi; Hiroshi Wada; Shin-Ichi Momomura; Hideo Fujita
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2019-07-20

Review 4.  Clinical expert consensus document on rotational atherectomy from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics.

Authors:  Kenichi Sakakura; Yoshiaki Ito; Yoshisato Shibata; Atsunori Okamura; Yoshifumi Kashima; Shigeru Nakamura; Yuji Hamazaki; Junya Ako; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Yoshio Kobayashi; Yuji Ikari
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2020-10-20

5.  Intravascular Lithotripsy for Vessel Preparation in Calcified Coronary Arteries Prior to Stent Placement - Japanese Disrupt CAD IV Study 1-Year Results.

Authors:  Shigeru Saito; Seiji Yamazaki; Akihiko Takahashi; Atsuo Namiki; Tomohiro Kawasaki; Satoru Otsuji; Shigeru Nakamura; Yoshisato Shibata
Journal:  Circ Rep       Date:  2022-08-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.