Literature DB >> 22865275

Predictive value of T2-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced MR imaging in assessing myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: a pooled analysis of prospective studies.

Lian-Ming Wu1, Jian-Rong Xu, Hai-Yan Gu, Jia Hua, E Mark Haacke, Jiani Hu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To obtain diagnostic performance values of T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) in the prediction of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer.
METHODS: Databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for relevant original articles published from January 1995 to March 2012. Pooled estimation data were obtained by statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Eleven articles (548 patients) were included. For assessing any myometrial involvement, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for CE-MRI were 0.81 (95% CI, 0.72, 0.88), 0.72 (95% CI, 0.64, 0.79), 0.65 (95% CI, 0.56, 0.73) and 0.85 (95% CI, 0.78, 0.91); for T2WI, they were 0.87 (95% CI, 0.78, 0.94), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.47, 0.69), 0.64 (95% CI, 0.54, 0.73), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.73, 0.92) respectively. The pooled specificity of CE-MRI (0.72) was significantly higher than T2WI (0.58) (P < 0.05). For assessing deep myometrial involvement, there was no statistically significant difference between CE-MRI and T2WI, (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: CE-MRI has a good diagnostic performance in the prediction of any myometrial invasion and is superior to T2WI. But its PPV is somewhat suboptimal. For assessing deep myometrial involvement, its NPV appears relative high and negative findings strongly suggest an absence of deep myometrial involvement, which can guide therapeutic decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22865275     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2609-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  34 in total

1.  Myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted 3.0-T MR imaging--initial experience.

Authors:  Gigin Lin; Koon-Kwan Ng; Chee-Jen Chang; Jiun-Jie Wang; Kung-Chu Ho; Tzu-Chen Yen; Tzu-I Wu; Chun-Chieh Wang; Yu-Ruei Chen; Yu-Ting Huang; Shu-Hang Ng; Shih-Ming Jung; Ting-Chang Chang; Chyong-Huey Lai
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  MR imaging of endometrial carcinoma for preoperative staging at 3.0 T: comparison with imaging at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Masatoshi Hori; Tonsok Kim; Takamichi Murakami; Izumi Imaoka; Hiromitsu Onishi; Atsushi Nakamoto; Yasuhiro Nakaya; Kaname Tomoda; Tateki Tsutsui; Takayuki Enomoto; Tadashi Kimura; Hironobu Nakamura
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Fertility-preserving treatment in young patients with endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Chen-Bin Wang; Chin-Jung Wang; Huei-Jean Huang; Swei Hsueh; Hung-Hsueh Chou; Yung-Kuei Soong; Chyong-Huey Lai
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Prognostic significance of gross myometrial invasion with endometrial cancer.

Authors:  D M Larson; G P Connor; S K Broste; B R Krawisz; K K Johnson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Surgical staging in endometrial cancer: clinical-pathologic findings of a prospective study.

Authors:  R C Boronow; C P Morrow; W T Creasman; P J Disaia; S G Silverberg; A Miller; J A Blessing
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy in early-stage endometrial carcinoma: randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Pierluigi Benedetti Panici; Stefano Basile; Francesco Maneschi; Andrea Alberto Lissoni; Mauro Signorelli; Giovanni Scambia; Roberto Angioli; Saverio Tateo; Giorgia Mangili; Dionyssios Katsaros; Gaetano Garozzo; Elio Campagnutta; Nicoletta Donadello; Stefano Greggi; Mauro Melpignano; Francesco Raspagliesi; Nicola Ragni; Gennaro Cormio; Roberto Grassi; Massimo Franchi; Diana Giannarelli; Roldano Fossati; Valter Torri; Mariangela Amoroso; Clara Crocè; Costantino Mangioni
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  MR imaging in endometrial carcinoma as a diagnostic tool for the absence of myometrial invasion.

Authors:  Yoshifumi Nakao; Masatoshi Yokoyama; Koichi Hara; Yasuko Koyamatsu; Makio Yasunaga; Yasuhiro Araki; Yukiko Watanabe; Tsuyoshi Iwasaka
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Added value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting advanced stage disease in patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Evis Sala; Robin Crawford; Emma Senior; Ashley Shaw; Bryony Simcock; Kalliopi Vrotsou; Christopher Palmer; Pauline Rajan; Ilse Joubert; David Lomas
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.437

10.  Efficacy of systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer (MRC ASTEC trial): a randomised study.

Authors:  H Kitchener; A M C Swart; Q Qian; C Amos; M K B Parmar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  12 in total

1.  Preoperative pelvic MRI and 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT for lymph node staging and prognostication in endometrial cancer-time to revisit current imaging guidelines?

Authors:  Kristine E Fasmer; Ankush Gulati; Julie A Dybvik; Kari S Wagner-Larsen; Njål Lura; Øyvind Salvesen; David Forsse; Jone Trovik; Johanna M A Pijnenborg; Camilla Krakstad; Ingfrid S Haldorsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Endometrial Cancer MRI staging: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology.

Authors:  Stephanie Nougaret; Mariana Horta; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman; Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara; Aki Kido; Gabriele Masselli; Nishat Bharwani; Elizabeth Sadowski; Andrea Ertmer; Milagros Otero-Garcia; Rahel A Kubik-Huch; Teresa M Cunha; Andrea Rockall; Rosemarie Forstner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Second-Opinion Interpretations of Gynecologic Oncologic MRI Examinations by Sub-Specialized Radiologists Influence Patient Care.

Authors:  Yulia Lakhman; Melvin D'Anastasi; Maura Miccò; Chiara Scelzo; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Stephanie Nougaret; Ramon E Sosa; Dennis S Chi; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Hedvig Hricak; Evis Sala
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Preserving fertility in young patients with endometrial cancer: current perspectives.

Authors:  Eleftheria Kalogera; Sean C Dowdy; Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-07-29

5.  Long-term outcomes of magnetic resonance imaging-invisible endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Hyun Jin Choi; Sunyoung Lee; Byung Kwan Park; Tae Joong Kim; Chan Kyo Kim; Jung Jae Park; Chel Hun Choi; Yoo Young Lee; Jeong Won Lee; Duk Soo Bae; Byoung Gie Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Myometrial invasion and overall staging of endometrial carcinoma: assessment using fusion of T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yu Guo; Ping Wang; Penghui Wang; Wei Gao; Fenge Li; Xueling Yang; Hongyan Ni; Wen Shen; Zhi Guo
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Fertility-sparing treatment in early endometrial cancer: current state and future strategies.

Authors:  Andreas Obermair; Eva Baxter; Donal J Brennan; Jessica N McAlpine; Jennifer J Muellerer; Frédéric Amant; Mignon D J M van Gent; Robert L Coleman; Shannon N Westin; Melinda S Yates; Camilla Krakstad; Monika Janda
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2020-07-08

8.  Microcystic, Elongated and Fragmented Pattern Invasion Can Adversely Influence Preoperative Staging for Low-grade Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Ryo Kuwahara; Aki Kido; Ryo Yajima; Naoko Nishio; Kyoko Nakao; Yasuhisa Kurata; Shiro Tanaka; Sachiko Minamiguchi; Tsukasa Baba; Masaki Mandai; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with T2-weighted imaging for preoperative staging of early endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Linfeng Zheng; Sujuan Zheng; Xiaochun Yuan; Xifu Wang; Zhuoli Zhang; Guixiang Zhang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  L Helpman; R Kupets; A Covens; R S Saad; M A Khalifa; N Ismiil; Z Ghorab; V Dubé; S Nofech-Mozes
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.