Alison Coll1, Moira Kinnear, Anne Kinnear. 1. NHS Lothian Pharmacy Service, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Little France, Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, Scotland, UK. alison.coll@luht.scot.nhs.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial guidelines aim to optimise treatment and minimise development of resistance. Care bundles support the implementation of local guidelines. OBJECTIVE: Pharmacist identification of where in the prescribing, monitoring and documentation process, the quality of antimicrobial management in a High Dependency Unit of a large teaching hospital could be improved and design of antimicrobial care bundles for initiation and de-escalation of therapy to standardise care and improve practice. SETTING: This study was conducted in a 10-bed, mixed medical-surgical HDU in a large Scottish (UK) teaching hospital. METHODS: Quality indicators (n = 30) were agreed through multidisciplinary team review with reference to the evidence base, national strategy and local policy. Adherence to these quality indicators was measured before and after the pharmacist's contributions. Areas of non-adherence to quality indicators were used to design the care bundles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adherence to the quality indicators before and after the pharmacist's action. Categorisation of pharmaceutical care issues ('check', 'change in drug therapy' and 'change in drug therapy process') were quantified. RESULTS: From 134 prescriptions, the pharmacist undertook 1,447 actions to ensure adherence to the 30 indicators. Adherence was very good (85.3 % CI 83.5, 87.1), but would have been unsatisfactory (53.5 % CI 50.9, 56.1) without the pharmacist's action (p < 0.001). Change in drug therapy process or change in drug therapy initiated by the pharmacist accounted for 31.9 % (CI 29.5, 34.3) of adherence. Non-adherence was related to documentation of past allergic reactions, bacteriological specimen results, indication and length of course of treatment (both at initiation and de-escalation). Care bundles were designed to target areas of non-adherence to local guidelines. CONCLUSION: The pharmacist made a significant contribution to improving adherence to evidence based antimicrobial prescribing quality indicators agreed by the multidisciplinary team. Prompts have been identified from the pharmaceutical care process and applied in the design of two antimicrobial care bundles proposed to support adherence with antimicrobial prescribing policies and guidelines.
BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial guidelines aim to optimise treatment and minimise development of resistance. Care bundles support the implementation of local guidelines. OBJECTIVE: Pharmacist identification of where in the prescribing, monitoring and documentation process, the quality of antimicrobial management in a High Dependency Unit of a large teaching hospital could be improved and design of antimicrobial care bundles for initiation and de-escalation of therapy to standardise care and improve practice. SETTING: This study was conducted in a 10-bed, mixed medical-surgical HDU in a large Scottish (UK) teaching hospital. METHODS: Quality indicators (n = 30) were agreed through multidisciplinary team review with reference to the evidence base, national strategy and local policy. Adherence to these quality indicators was measured before and after the pharmacist's contributions. Areas of non-adherence to quality indicators were used to design the care bundles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adherence to the quality indicators before and after the pharmacist's action. Categorisation of pharmaceutical care issues ('check', 'change in drug therapy' and 'change in drug therapy process') were quantified. RESULTS: From 134 prescriptions, the pharmacist undertook 1,447 actions to ensure adherence to the 30 indicators. Adherence was very good (85.3 % CI 83.5, 87.1), but would have been unsatisfactory (53.5 % CI 50.9, 56.1) without the pharmacist's action (p < 0.001). Change in drug therapy process or change in drug therapy initiated by the pharmacist accounted for 31.9 % (CI 29.5, 34.3) of adherence. Non-adherence was related to documentation of past allergic reactions, bacteriological specimen results, indication and length of course of treatment (both at initiation and de-escalation). Care bundles were designed to target areas of non-adherence to local guidelines. CONCLUSION: The pharmacist made a significant contribution to improving adherence to evidence based antimicrobial prescribing quality indicators agreed by the multidisciplinary team. Prompts have been identified from the pharmaceutical care process and applied in the design of two antimicrobial care bundles proposed to support adherence with antimicrobial prescribing policies and guidelines.
Authors: J M Grimshaw; R E Thomas; G MacLennan; C Fraser; C R Ramsay; L Vale; P Whitty; M P Eccles; L Matowe; L Shirran; M Wensing; R Dijkstra; C Donaldson Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: Timothy H Dellit; Robert C Owens; John E McGowan; Dale N Gerding; Robert A Weinstein; John P Burke; W Charles Huskins; David L Paterson; Neil O Fishman; Christopher F Carpenter; P J Brennan; Marianne Billeter; Thomas M Hooton Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2006-12-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Andrew Conway Morris; Alasdair W Hay; David G Swann; Kirsty Everingham; Corrienne McCulloch; Jane McNulty; Odette Brooks; Ian F Laurenson; Brian Cook; Timothy S Walsh Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: C Vercheval; M Gillet; N Maes; A Albert; F Frippiat; P Damas; T Van Hees Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 3.267