Literature DB >> 22864794

Reaching families at their homes for an intervention to reduce tobacco smoke exposure among infants.

Nadin Kastirke1, Ulrich John, Christian Goeze, Janine Sannemann, Sabina Ulbricht.   

Abstract

The methods of reaching families for a home intervention trial (HIT) were analyzed in this study. The study aimed to reduce environmental tobacco smoke exposure among infants in one region of Germany. The systematic screening data of smoking among families in their homes were compared with reference data of a representative household sample of the state in which the study was conducted. The characteristics of participating and non-participating families were analyzed. All households (N = 3,570) containing at least one infant age 3 years or younger were selected using the residents` registration files and invited to participate in a screening assessment. Among these families, 3,293 (92.2 %) were contacted and from that group, 2,641 families participated in the screening. Compared with the reference sample, the screened sample included a higher proportion of families with employment and with more than 10 years of education. Participation in the HIT was recommended if at least one parent reported smoking one or more cigarettes per day during the previous 4 weeks. Among the 1,282 families that met the inclusion criteria, 71.5 % took part in the screening. Participating families, compared with non-participating families, were older, included more families with two parents living in the household, and had higher rates of employment. The effect size of the final regression model was small (Cohen's f (2) = 0.01). In conclusion, proactive approaches that are delivered at home may yield a high reach of the target population and particularly of socioeconomically disadvantaged populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22864794     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-012-9602-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  12 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework.

Authors:  R E Glasgow; T M Vogt; S M Boles
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries.

Authors:  Johan P Mackenbach; Irina Stirbu; Albert-Jan R Roskam; Maartje M Schaap; Gwenn Menvielle; Mall Leinsalu; Anton E Kunst
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke: the empirical evidence and directions for future research.

Authors:  M F Hovell; J M Zakarian; D R Wahlgren; G E Matt
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Parent recruitment and retention in a universal prevention program for child behavior and emotional problems: barriers to research and program participation.

Authors:  Nina Heinrichs; Heike Bertram; Annett Kuschel; Kurt Hahlweg
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2005-12

Review 5.  Reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in homes: issues and strategies.

Authors:  M J Ashley; R Ferrence
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 6.  Family and carer smoking control programmes for reducing children's exposure to environmental tobacco smoke.

Authors:  Naomi Priest; Rob Roseby; Elizabeth Waters; Adam Polnay; Rona Campbell; Nick Spencer; Premila Webster; Grace Ferguson-Thorne
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-10-08

7.  Childhood social position and associations between environmental exposures and health outcomes.

Authors:  Barbara Hoffmann; Bita Kolahgar; Knut Rauchfuss; Georg Eberwein; Isabelle Franzen-Reuter; Martin Kraft; Michael Wilhelm; Ulrich Ranft; Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 5.840

8.  Socioeconomic determinants of children's environmental tobacco smoke exposure and family's home smoking policy.

Authors:  Gabriele Bolte; Hermann Fromme
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 3.367

9.  Overcoming barriers to engaging socio-economically disadvantaged populations in CHD primary prevention: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Christopher Harkins; Rebecca Shaw; Michelle Gillies; Heather Sloan; Kate Macintyre; Anne Scoular; Caroline Morrison; Fiona Mackay; Heather Cunningham; Paul Docherty; Paul Macintyre; Iain N Findlay
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The moderating role of parental smoking on their children's attitudes toward smoking among a predominantly minority sample: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Anna V Wilkinson; Sanjay Shete; Alexander V Prokhorov
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2008-07-14
View more
  2 in total

1.  Predictors of indoor smoking at young children's homes--a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sabina Ulbricht; Josefine Holdys; Christian Meyer; Nadin Kastirke; Severin Haug; Ulrich John
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.183

2.  Factors associated with secondhand smoke exposure prevalence and secondhand smoke level of children living with parental smokers: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Sabina Ulbricht; Friederike Unger; Stefan Groß; Matthias Nauck; Christian Meyer; Ulrich John
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.