Literature DB >> 22864185

Adenosine receptor activation is responsible for prolonged depression of synaptic transmission after spreading depolarization in brain slices.

B E Lindquist1, C W Shuttleworth.   

Abstract

Spreading depolarization (SD) is a slowly propagating, coordinated depolarization of brain tissue, which is followed by a transient (5-10min) depression of synaptic activity. The mechanisms for synaptic depression after SD are incompletely understood. We examined the relative contributions of action potential failure and adenosine receptor activation to the suppression of evoked synaptic activity in murine brain slices. Focal micro-injection of potassium chloride (KCl) was used to induce SD and synaptic potentials were evoked by electrical stimulation of Schaffer collateral inputs to hippocampal area Cornu Ammonis area 1 (CA1). SD was accompanied by loss of both presynaptic action potentials (as assessed from fiber volleys) and field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs). Fiber volleys recovered rapidly upon neutralization of the extracellular direct current (DC) potential, whereas fEPSPs underwent a secondary suppression phase lasting several minutes. Paired-pulse ratio was elevated during the secondary suppression period, consistent with a presynaptic mechanism of synaptic depression. A transient increase in extracellular adenosine concentration was detected during the period of secondary suppression. Antagonists of adenosine A1 receptors (8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine [DPCPX] or 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethylxanthine [8-CPT]) greatly accelerated fEPSP recovery and abolished increases in paired-pulse ratio normally observed after SD. The duration of fEPSP suppression was correlated with both the duration of the DC shift and the area of tissue depolarized, consistent with the model that adenosine accumulates in proportion to the metabolic burden of SD. These results suggest that in brain slices, the duration of the DC shift approximately defined the period of action potential failure, but the secondary depression of evoked responses was in large part due to endogenous adenosine accumulation after SD.
Copyright © 2012 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22864185      PMCID: PMC3489063          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.07.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  46 in total

Review 1.  Facilitation, augmentation and potentiation at central synapses.

Authors:  A M Thomson
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 2.  Spreading depression-like depolarization and selective vulnerability of neurons. A brief review.

Authors:  G G Somjen; P G Aitken; M Balestrino; O Herreras; K Kawasaki
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Experimental and preliminary clinical evidence of an ischemic zone with prolonged negative DC shifts surrounded by a normally perfused tissue belt with persistent electrocorticographic depression.

Authors:  Ana I Oliveira-Ferreira; Denny Milakara; Mesbah Alam; Devi Jorks; Sebastian Major; Jed A Hartings; Janos Lückl; Peter Martus; Rudolf Graf; Christian Dohmen; Georg Bohner; Johannes Woitzik; Jens P Dreier
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Metabolic challenge to glia activates an adenosine-mediated safety mechanism that promotes neuronal survival by delaying the onset of spreading depression waves.

Authors:  Santiago Canals; Belén Larrosa; Jesús Pintor; María A Mena; Oscar Herreras
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 5.  Short-term synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  Robert S Zucker; Wade G Regehr
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 19.318

Review 6.  Mechanisms of spreading depression and hypoxic spreading depression-like depolarization.

Authors:  G G Somjen
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Spreading depolarizations have prolonged direct current shifts and are associated with poor outcome in brain trauma.

Authors:  Jed A Hartings; Tomas Watanabe; M Ross Bullock; David O Okonkwo; Martin Fabricius; Johannes Woitzik; Jens P Dreier; Ava Puccio; Lori A Shutter; Clemens Pahl; Anthony J Strong
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Delayed secondary phase of peri-infarct depolarizations after focal cerebral ischemia: relation to infarct growth and neuroprotection.

Authors:  Jed A Hartings; Michael L Rolli; X-C May Lu; Frank C Tortella
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Adenosine-mediated synaptic depression and EPSP/spike dissociation following high potassium-induced depolarization in rat hippocampal slices.

Authors:  Youn-Kwan Park; Eun-Sheb Shim; Jae-In Oh; Joo-Han Kim; Yong-Gu Chung
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Compromised metabolic recovery following spontaneous spreading depression in the penumbra.

Authors:  Warren R Selman; W David Lust; Svetlana Pundik; Yinong Zhou; Robert A Ratcheson
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  26 in total

1.  Ketamine reduces deleterious consequences of spreading depolarizations.

Authors:  Katelyn M Reinhart; C William Shuttleworth
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Real-time monitoring of extracellular adenosine using enzyme-linked microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Jason M Hinzman; Justin L Gibson; Ryan D Tackla; Mark S Costello; Jason J Burmeister; Jorge E Quintero; Greg A Gerhardt; Jed A Hartings
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 10.618

3.  Direct current electrocorticography for clinical neuromonitoring of spreading depolarizations.

Authors:  Jed A Hartings; Chunyan Li; Jason M Hinzman; C William Shuttleworth; Griffin L Ernst; Jens P Dreier; J Adam Wilson; Norberto Andaluz; Brandon Foreman; Andrew P Carlson
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 4.  Spreading Depression, Spreading Depolarizations, and the Cerebral Vasculature.

Authors:  Cenk Ayata; Martin Lauritzen
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 37.312

5.  Mechanisms of Neuronal Silencing After Cortical Spreading Depression.

Authors:  P M Sawant-Pokam; P Suryavanshi; J M Mendez; F E Dudek; K C Brennan
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Multifaceted roles for astrocytes in spreading depolarization: A target for limiting spreading depolarization in acute brain injury?

Authors:  Jessica L Seidel; Carole Escartin; Cenk Ayata; Gilles Bonvento; C William Shuttleworth
Journal:  Glia       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 7.452

7.  Oxygen availability and spreading depolarizations provide complementary prognostic information in neuromonitoring of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.

Authors:  Maren Kl Winkler; Nora Dengler; Nils Hecht; Jed A Hartings; Eun J Kang; Sebastian Major; Peter Martus; Peter Vajkoczy; Johannes Woitzik; Jens P Dreier
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  Spreading depolarization-induced adenosine accumulation reflects metabolic status in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Britta E Lindquist; C William Shuttleworth
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 9.  Purines: From Diagnostic Biomarkers to Therapeutic Agents in Brain Injury.

Authors:  Bruno G Frenguelli; Nicholas Dale
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 10.  Recording, analysis, and interpretation of spreading depolarizations in neurointensive care: Review and recommendations of the COSBID research group.

Authors:  Jens P Dreier; Martin Fabricius; Cenk Ayata; Oliver W Sakowitz; C William Shuttleworth; Christian Dohmen; Rudolf Graf; Peter Vajkoczy; Raimund Helbok; Michiyasu Suzuki; Alois J Schiefecker; Sebastian Major; Maren Kl Winkler; Eun-Jeung Kang; Denny Milakara; Ana I Oliveira-Ferreira; Clemens Reiffurth; Gajanan S Revankar; Kazutaka Sugimoto; Nora F Dengler; Nils Hecht; Brandon Foreman; Bart Feyen; Daniel Kondziella; Christian K Friberg; Henning Piilgaard; Eric S Rosenthal; M Brandon Westover; Anna Maslarova; Edgar Santos; Daniel Hertle; Renán Sánchez-Porras; Sharon L Jewell; Baptiste Balança; Johannes Platz; Jason M Hinzman; Janos Lückl; Karl Schoknecht; Michael Schöll; Christoph Drenckhahn; Delphine Feuerstein; Nina Eriksen; Viktor Horst; Julia S Bretz; Paul Jahnke; Michael Scheel; Georg Bohner; Egill Rostrup; Bente Pakkenberg; Uwe Heinemann; Jan Claassen; Andrew P Carlson; Christina M Kowoll; Svetlana Lublinsky; Yoash Chassidim; Ilan Shelef; Alon Friedman; Gerrit Brinker; Michael Reiner; Sergei A Kirov; R David Andrew; Eszter Farkas; Erdem Güresir; Hartmut Vatter; Lee S Chung; K C Brennan; Thomas Lieutaud; Stephane Marinesco; Andrew Ir Maas; Juan Sahuquillo; Markus A Dahlem; Frank Richter; Oscar Herreras; Martyn G Boutelle; David O Okonkwo; M Ross Bullock; Otto W Witte; Peter Martus; Arn Mjm van den Maagdenberg; Michel D Ferrari; Rick M Dijkhuizen; Lori A Shutter; Norberto Andaluz; André P Schulte; Brian MacVicar; Tomas Watanabe; Johannes Woitzik; Martin Lauritzen; Anthony J Strong; Jed A Hartings
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 6.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.