Literature DB >> 22863156

Guideline adherence in cardiovascular risk assessment and analysis in 15,000 hypertensive German patients in real life: results of the Prospective 3A Registry.

Ralf Dechend1, Edelgard Kaiser, Wolfgang Derer, Evelin Deeg, Andreas Busjahn, Roland E Schmieder, Uwe Zeymer.   

Abstract

The benefit obtained from antihypertensive treatment is related more to overall cardiovascular risk reduction than to blood pressure levels. Accurate implementation of cardiovascular diagnostics is a key step toward assessment of cardiovascular risk. In the 3A Registry study, data about patient history, concomitant diseases, diagnostic procedures, and medications were prospectively collected. A total of 14,738 patients recruited by 899 physicians in 2008 and 2009 were analyzed. Assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and subclinical end-organ damage (SOD) showed broad differences in the implementation of European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology recommendations. Electrocardiograms were available in 59% of patients, cholesterol in 71.4%, and glucose in 69.7%. Almost all patients (99.6%) had creatinine measurements performed and microalbuminuria was measured in 8.5%. Metabolic syndrome (MS) had been evaluated in 59.7%. Implementation of diagnostic guidelines was highest in hypertensive patients with diabetes, followed by patients with known cardiovascular disease and established chronic renal insufficiency. For hypertensive patients without known comorbidities, the authors estimated that up to 29% had missed SOD (detection rate <50%) and 13% missed MS due to incomplete assessment of risk factors. This large registry study shows that assessment for cardiovascular risk factors and SOD is incomplete. Major efforts are required to improve comprehensive hypertension management as recommended by current guidelines.
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22863156      PMCID: PMC8108746          DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00650.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  29 in total

1.  Estimates of global and regional potential health gains from reducing multiple major risk factors.

Authors:  Majid Ezzati; Stephen Vander Hoorn; Anthony Rodgers; Alan D Lopez; Colin D Mathers; Christopher J L Murray
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-07-26       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Noninvasive measurement of carotid extra-media thickness: associations with cardiovascular risk factors and intima-media thickness.

Authors:  Michael R Skilton; André Sérusclat; Arun Harrish A U Sethu; Sophie Brun; Sophie Bernard; Beverley Balkau; Philippe Moulin; Fabrice Bonnet
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-02

3.  Blood pressure management in a cohort of hypertensive patients in Germany treated by cardiologists.

Authors:  Martin Thoenes; Ulrich Tebbe; Ludger Rosin; W Dieter Paar; Peter Bramlage; Wilhelm Kirch; Michael Böhm
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.460

4.  Cardiovascular risk factors in primary care: methods and baseline prevalence rates--the DETECT program.

Authors:  H-U Wittchen; H Glaesmer; W März; G Stalla; H Lehnert; A M Zeiher; S Silber; U Koch; S Böhler; D Pittrow; G Ruf
Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.580

5.  High prevalence and poor control of hypertension in primary care: cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Arya M Sharma; Hans-Ulrich Wittchen; Wilhelm Kirch; David Pittrow; Eberhard Ritz; Burkhard Göke; Hendrik Lehnert; Diethelm Tschöpe; Petra Krause; Michael Höfler; Hildegard Pfister; Peter Bramlage; Thomas Unger
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.844

6.  Kidney function and cardiovascular disease in the hypertensive population: the ERIC-HTA study.

Authors:  Josep Redón; Luis Cea-Calvo; José V Lozano; Cristina Fernández-Pérez; Jorge Navarro; Alvaro Bonet; Jorge González-Esteban
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Different calculations of ankle-brachial index and their impact on cardiovascular risk prediction.

Authors:  Christine Espinola-Klein; Hans J Rupprecht; Christoph Bickel; Karl Lackner; Savvas Savvidis; Claudia M Messow; Thomas Munzel; Stefan Blankenberg
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Microalbuminuria identifies overall cardiovascular risk in essential hypertension: an artificial neural network-based approach.

Authors:  Giovanna Leoncini; Giorgio Sacchi; Francesca Viazzi; Maura Ravera; Denise Parodi; Elena Ratto; Simone Vettoretti; Cinzia Tomolillo; Giacomo Deferrari; Roberto Pontremoli
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.844

9.  Hypertension prevalence and blood pressure levels in 6 European countries, Canada, and the United States.

Authors:  Katharina Wolf-Maier; Richard S Cooper; José R Banegas; Simona Giampaoli; Hans-Werner Hense; Michel Joffres; Mika Kastarinen; Neil Poulter; Paola Primatesta; Fernando Rodríguez-Artalejo; Birgitta Stegmayr; Michael Thamm; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Diego Vanuzzo; Fenicia Vescio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  2 in total

1.  The impact of an individualized risk-adjusted approach on hypertension treatment in primary care.

Authors:  Stefan Zechmann; Oliver Senn; Fabio Valeri; Stefan Neuner-Jehle; Thomas Rosemann; Sima Djalali
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.738

2.  Two-Year Outcomes of Patients Treated With Aliskiren Under Clinical Practice Conditions: Non-Interventional Prospective Study.

Authors:  Uwe Zeymer; Ralf Dechend; Thomas Riemer; Evelin Deeg; Jochen Senges; David Pittrow; Roland Schmieder
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.