Literature DB >> 22863144

Evaluation of clinical, histological and immunological changes and qPCR detection of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae in tissues during the early stages of mycoplasmal pneumonia in pigs after experimental challenge with two field isolates.

Lauren K Woolley1, Shayne Fell, Jocelyn R Gonsalves, Mark J Walker, Steven P Djordjevic, Cheryl Jenkins, Graeme J Eamens.   

Abstract

Differences in Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae strain virulence and infection patterns will affect experimental challenge systems used to evaluate vaccine efficacy. Two strains (Hillcrest and Beaufort) were assessed by experimental pig challenge for their ability to induce clinical and pathological lesions and cytokine responses. Tracheobronchial lavage fluid (TBLF) was collected before and 17-18 days after challenge with Hillcrest (n=8), Beaufort (n=8) or no organisms (n=3). Coughing was assessed twice daily, and at slaughter 21 (n=9) or 28 (n=10) days post-challenge, gross and histopathology of lungs were quantified and a quantitative PCR (mhp183 qPCR) was applied to detect M. hyopneumoniae DNA in tissues and TBLF. Hillcrest was clearly superior to Beaufort in its ability to induce coughing and pneumonic lesions. At 17-18 days, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-6 concentrations in TBLF were only significantly higher (8.7 and 5.1 fold respectively) than controls (P<0.001) in Hillcrest-challenged pigs. Lungs of all Hillcrest-challenged pigs were qPCR positive at either slaughter date, but only at day 28 in Beaufort-challenged pigs. M. hyopneumoniae DNA was highest in concentration in lungs 21 days after Hillcrest challenge, and was detected in the spleen, kidney and/or liver of Hillcrest-challenged pigs, but not in Beaufort pigs. While M. hyopneumoniae DNA concentration in TBLF was elevated following Hillcrest and Beaufort challenge, there was no significant difference in mean mycoplasmal DNA concentration detected in TBLF from pigs challenged with either isolate (P>0.05). Thus a suitable challenge strain, coupled with lung pathology and cytokine assays, are valuable in assessing post-challenge responses. Assessment of M. hyopneumoniae DNA in lung and abdominal tissues by mhp183 qPCR, in conjunction with histopathology, were valuable in confirming M. hyopneumoniae infection. Crown
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22863144     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  15 in total

1.  Investigating the role of free-ranging wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the re-emergence of enzootic pneumonia in domestic pig herds: a pathological, prevalence and risk-factor study.

Authors:  Mainity Batista Linhares; Luc Belloy; Francesco C Origgi; Isabel Lechner; Helmut Segner; Marie-Pierre Ryser-Degiorgis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Induction of mycoplasmal pneumonia in experimentally infected pigs by means of different inoculation routes.

Authors:  Beatriz Garcia-Morante; Joaquim Segalés; Sergio López-Soria; Ana Pérez de Rozas; Henrike Maiti; Teresa Coll; Marina Sibila
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.683

Review 3.  Determinants for swine mycoplasmal pneumonia reproduction under experimental conditions: A systematic review and recursive partitioning analysis.

Authors:  Beatriz Garcia-Morante; Joaquim Segalés; Emmanuel Serrano; Marina Sibila
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Extracellular Actin Is a Receptor for Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae.

Authors:  Benjamin B A Raymond; Ranya Madhkoor; Ina Schleicher; Cord C Uphoff; Lynne Turnbull; Cynthia B Whitchurch; Manfred Rohde; Matthew P Padula; Steven P Djordjevic
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 5.293

5.  Assessment of the in vitro growing dynamics and kinetics of the non-pathogenic J and pathogenic 11 and 232 Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae strains.

Authors:  Beatriz Garcia-Morante; Arkadius Dors; Rocio León-Kempis; Ana Pérez de Rozas; Joaquim Segalés; Marina Sibila
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.683

6.  Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae resides intracellularly within porcine epithelial cells.

Authors:  B B A Raymond; L Turnbull; C Jenkins; R Madhkoor; I Schleicher; C C Uphoff; C B Whitchurch; M Rohde; S P Djordjevic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  MHJ_0125 is an M42 glutamyl aminopeptidase that moonlights as a multifunctional adhesin on the surface of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae.

Authors:  Mark W Robinson; Kyle A Buchtmann; Cheryl Jenkins; Jessica L Tacchi; Benjamin B A Raymond; Joyce To; Piklu Roy Chowdhury; Lauren K Woolley; Maurizio Labbate; Lynne Turnbull; Cynthia B Whitchurch; Matthew P Padula; Steven P Djordjevic
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 6.411

8.  Etiology of acute respiratory disease in fattening pigs in Finland.

Authors:  Minna Haimi-Hakala; Outi Hälli; Tapio Laurila; Mirja Raunio-Saarnisto; Tiina Nokireki; Taina Laine; Suvi Nykäsenoja; Kirsti Pelkola; Joaquim Segales; Marina Sibila; Claudio Oliviero; Olli Peltoniemi; Sinikka Pelkonen; Mari Heinonen
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2017-08-23

9.  Extracellular DNA release from the genome-reduced pathogen Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae is essential for biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces.

Authors:  Benjamin B A Raymond; Cheryl Jenkins; Lynne Turnbull; Cynthia B Whitchurch; Steven P Djordjevic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Genomic Variability and Post-translational Protein Processing Enhance the Immune Evasion of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Its Interaction With the Porcine Immune System.

Authors:  Gaojian Li; Enoch Obeng; Jinqi Shu; Jianhong Shu; Jian Chen; Yuehong Wu; Yulong He
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.