Literature DB >> 22863069

Quantifying uncertainty in LCA-modelling of waste management systems.

Julie Clavreul1, Dominique Guyonnet, Thomas H Christensen.   

Abstract

Uncertainty analysis in LCA studies has been subject to major progress over the last years. In the context of waste management, various methods have been implemented but a systematic method for uncertainty analysis of waste-LCA studies is lacking. The objective of this paper is (1) to present the sources of uncertainty specifically inherent to waste-LCA studies, (2) to select and apply several methods for uncertainty analysis and (3) to develop a general framework for quantitative uncertainty assessment of LCA of waste management systems. The suggested method is a sequence of four steps combining the selected methods: (Step 1) a sensitivity analysis evaluating the sensitivities of the results with respect to the input uncertainties, (Step 2) an uncertainty propagation providing appropriate tools for representing uncertainties and calculating the overall uncertainty of the model results, (Step 3) an uncertainty contribution analysis quantifying the contribution of each parameter uncertainty to the final uncertainty and (Step 4) as a new approach, a combined sensitivity analysis providing a visualisation of the shift in the ranking of different options due to variations of selected key parameters. This tiered approach optimises the resources available to LCA practitioners by only propagating the most influential uncertainties.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22863069     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  7 in total

1.  Carbon footprint assessment of Western Australian Groundwater Recycling Scheme.

Authors:  Andrew Simms; Stacey Hamilton; Wahidul K Biswas
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 2.  Reviewing the anaerobic digestion and co-digestion process of food waste from the perspectives on biogas production performance and environmental impacts.

Authors:  Sam L H Chiu; Irene M C Lo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Environmental and health impacts of using food waste as animal feed: a comparative analysis of food waste management options.

Authors:  Ramy Salemdeeb; Erasmus K H J Zu Ermgassen; Mi Hyung Kim; Andrew Balmford; Abir Al-Tabbaa
Journal:  J Clean Prod       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 9.297

4.  Environmental Benefit Assessment of Blended Cement with Modified Granulated Copper Slag.

Authors:  Qinli Zhang; Bingyi Zhang; Daolin Wang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 3.748

5.  Estimation of Methane Emissions from Slurry Pits below Pig and Cattle Confinements.

Authors:  Søren O Petersen; Anne B Olsen; Lars Elsgaard; Jin Mi Triolo; Sven G Sommer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Optimizing emissions and carbon credit from integrated solid waste and wastewater management: A MATLAB-based model with a Graphical User Interface (v1).

Authors:  Amani Maalouf; Mutasem El-Fadel
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2020-02-24

7.  Cement-Matrix Composites Using CFRP Waste: A Circular Economy Perspective Using Industrial Symbiosis.

Authors:  Pierluca Vitale; Rosanna Napolitano; Francesco Colella; Costantino Menna; Domenico Asprone
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.