Literature DB >> 22863027

Impact of water treatment on the contribution of faucets to dissolved and particulate lead release at the tap.

Clément Cartier1, Shokoufeh Nour, Benoit Richer, Elise Deshommes, Michèle Prévost.   

Abstract

A field study was performed in a building complex to investigate the extent and sources of lead (Pb) release in tap water and brass material was found to be the main contributor in the very first draw (250 mL). Based on these results, a pilot installation was built to study Pb leaching from old and new faucets in the presence and absence of a connection to Cu piping. Four water quality conditions were tested: i) no treatment; ii) addition of 0.8 mg P/L of orthophosphate; iii) pH adjustment to 8.4; and iv) adjustment to a higher chloride to sulfate mass ratio (CSMR; ratio from 0.3 to 2.9). Pb concentrations in samples taken from the faucets without treatment ranged from 1 to 52 μg/L, with a mean of 11 μg/L. The addition of orthophosphate @ 0.8 mg P/L (OrthoP) was the most effective treatment for all types of faucets tested. On average, OrthoP reduced mean Pb leaching by 41%, and was especially effective for new double faucets (70%). In the presence of orthophosphates, the relative proportion of particulate Pb (Pbpart) (>0.45 μm) increased from 31% to 54%. However, OrthoP was not efficient to reduce Zn release. The higher CSMR condition was associated with greater dezincification of yellow brass but not of red brass. Corrosion control treatment influenced Pb concentration equilibrium, directly impacting maximal exposure. Significantly higher Pb release (3 fold) was observed for 1 of the 8 faucets connected to Cu exposed to high CSMR water, suggesting the presence of galvanic corrosion.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22863027     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  5 in total

Review 1.  Public Health Consequences of Lead in Drinking Water.

Authors:  Patrick Levallois; Prabjit Barn; Mathieu Valcke; Denis Gauvin; Tom Kosatsky
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2018-06

2.  Experimental comparison of the reproductive outcomes and early development of the offspring of rats given five common types of drinking water.

Authors:  Hui Zeng; Ji-an Chen; Lin Liu; Da-hua Wang; Wen-juan Fu; Ling-qiao Wang; Jiao-hua Luo; Liang Zhang; Yao Tan; Zhi-qun Qiu; Yu-jing Huang; Wei-qun Shu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Long-Term Behavior of Simulated Partial Lead Service Line Replacements.

Authors:  Justin St Clair; Clement Cartier; Simoni Triantafyllidou; Brandi Clark; Marc Edwards
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2016-01-01       Impact factor: 1.907

4.  Tracking reduction of water lead levels in two homes during the Flint Federal Emergency.

Authors:  Anurag Mantha; Min Tang; Kelsey J Pieper; Jeffrey L Parks; Marc A Edwards
Journal:  Water Res X       Date:  2020-03-03

Review 5.  Variability and sampling of lead (Pb) in drinking water: Assessing potential human exposure depends on the sampling protocol.

Authors:  Simoni Triantafyllidou; Jonathan Burkhardt; Jennifer Tully; Kelly Cahalan; Michael DeSantis; Darren Lytle; Michael Schock
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 9.621

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.