Literature DB >> 22862297

Relationship between cutoff values of peak aortic valve velocity and those of other Doppler echocardiographic parameters of severity in patients with aortic stenosis and normal flow.

Anne-Laure Castel1, Sylvestre Maréchaux, Jamal Laaouaj, Dan Rusinaru, Franck Levy, Christophe Tribouilloy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported inconsistencies between echocardiographic parameters of severity in aortic valve stenosis (AS). Peak aortic valve velocity (Vmax ) strongly predicts outcome in AS patients. This study was therefore designed to identify the cutoff values of echocardiographic parameters of severity corresponding to a Vmax ≥ 3 m/sec, ≥4 m/sec, 5 m/sec, or 5.50 m/sec in a large cohort of patients with normal flow (NF) AS. METHODS AND
RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed the echocardiograms of 528 consecutive patients with normal flow (NF) AS, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≥0.50, and NF (stroke volume index > 35 mL/m²). The values of mean pressure gradient (MPG), aortic valve area (AVA), and indexed aortic valve area (IAVA) corresponding to Vmax ≥ 3 m/sec obtained from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis were 22 mmHg, 1.15 cm(2) , and 0.60 cm(2) /m(2) , respectively. While a cutoff of Vmax ≥ 4 m/sec to define severe AS was consistent with a value of 39 mmHg for MPG, corresponding values for AVA and IAVA of 0.90 cm² and 0.48 cm²/m², respectively, were substantially different from those recommended in current guidelines. MPG ≥60 and 65 mmHg, AVA ≤0.76 and ≤0.68 cm², and IAVA ≤0.41 and ≤0.35 cm(2) /m(2) were related to a Vmax ≥5 and ≥5.5 m/sec (very severe AS), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines recommended cutoff values for AVA and IAVA are not consistent with those of Vmax and MPG. The results of this study may serve as safeguard in case of apparent inconsistencies between echocardiographic parameters of severity in NF AS.
© 2012, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve stenosis; echocardiography; surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22862297     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2012.01790.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Echocardiography        ISSN: 0742-2822            Impact factor:   1.724


  4 in total

1.  Prognostic Impact of Aortic Valve Area in Conservatively Managed Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis With Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Norio Kanamori; Tomohiko Taniguchi; Takeshi Morimoto; Hirotoshi Watanabe; Hiroki Shiomi; Kenji Ando; Koichiro Murata; Takeshi Kitai; Yuichi Kawase; Chisato Izumi; Makoto Miyake; Hirokazu Mitsuoka; Masashi Kato; Yutaka Hirano; Shintaro Matsuda; Kazuya Nagao; Tsukasa Inada; Hiroshi Mabuchi; Yasuyo Takeuchi; Keiichiro Yamane; Mamoru Toyofuku; Mitsuru Ishii; Eri Minamino-Muta; Takao Kato; Moriaki Inoko; Tomoyuki Ikeda; Akihiro Komasa; Katsuhisa Ishii; Kozo Hotta; Nobuya Higashitani; Yoshihiro Kato; Yasutaka Inuzuka; Chiyo Maeda; Toshikazu Jinnai; Yuko Morikami; Naritatsu Saito; Kenji Minatoya; Takeshi Aoyama; Takeshi Kimura
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 2.  Valvulo-Arterial Impedance and Dimensionless Index for Risk Stratifying Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Yogamaya Mantha; Shutaro Futami; Shohei Moriyama; Michinari Hieda
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-02

3.  Prognostic Value of Aortic Valve Area by Doppler Echocardiography in Patients With Severe Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Sylvestre Maréchaux; Anne Ringle; Dan Rusinaru; Nicolas Debry; Yoan Bohbot; Christophe Tribouilloy
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Impact of Mean Transaortic Pressure Gradient on Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.

Authors:  Yohann Bohbot; Cedric Kowalski; Dan Rusinaru; Anne Ringle; Sylvestre Marechaux; Christophe Tribouilloy
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 5.501

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.