Literature DB >> 22860797

A multicentre evaluation of two intensive care unit triage protocols for use in an influenza pandemic.

Winston K Cheung1, John Myburgh, Ian M Seppelt, Michael J Parr, Nikki Blackwell, Shannon Demonte, Kalpesh Gandhi, Larissa Hoyling, Priya Nair, Melissa Passer, Claire Reynolds, Nicholas M Saunders, Manoj K Saxena, Govindasamy Thanakrishnan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the increase in intensive care unit (ICU) bed availability that would result from the use of the New South Wales and Ontario Health Plan for an Influenza Pandemic (OHPIP) triage protocols. DESIGN, SETTING AND PATIENTS: Prospective evaluation study conducted in eight Australian, adult, general ICUs, between September 2009 and May 2010. All patients who were admitted to the ICU, excluding those who had elective surgery, were prospectively evaluated using the two triage protocols, simulating a pandemic situation. Both protocols were originally developed to determine which patients should be excluded from accessing ICU resources during an influenza pandemic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Increase in ICU bed availability.
RESULTS: At admission, the increases in ICU bed availability using Tiers 1, 2 and 3 of the NSW triage protocol were 3.5%, 14.7% and 22.7%, respectively, and 52.8% using the OHPIP triage protocol (P < 0.001). Re-evaluation of patients at 12 hours after admission using Tiers 1, 2 and 3 of the NSW triage protocol incrementally increased ICU bed availability by 19.2%, 16.1% and 14.1%, respectively (P < 0.001). The maximal cumulative increases in ICU bed availability using Tiers 1, 2 and 3 of the NSW triage protocol were 23.7%, 31.6% and 37.5%, respectively, at 72 hours (P < 0.001), and 65.0% using the OHPIP triage protocol, at 120 hours (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Both triage protocols resulted in increases in ICU bed availability, but the OHPIP protocol provided the greatest increase overall. With the NSW triage protocol, ICU bed availability increased as the protocol was escalated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22860797     DOI: 10.5694/mja11.10926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  8 in total

Review 1.  Decisions on the allocation of intensive care resources in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic : Clinical and ethical recommendations of DIVI, DGINA, DGAI, DGIIN, DGNI, DGP, DGP and AEM.

Authors:  Georg Marckmann; Gerald Neitzke; Jan Schildmann; Andrej Michalsen; Jochen Dutzmann; Christiane Hartog; Susanne Jöbges; Kathrin Knochel; Guido Michels; Martin Pin; Reimer Riessen; Annette Rogge; Jochen Taupitz; Uwe Janssens
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 2.  [Decisions on the allocation of intensive care resources in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic : Clinical and ethical recommendations of DIVI, DGINA, DGAI, DGIIN, DGNI, DGP, DGP and AEM. German version].

Authors:  Georg Marckmann; Gerald Neitzke; Jan Schildmann; Andrej Michalsen; Jochen Dutzmann; Christiane Hartog; Susanne Jöbges; Kathrin Knochel; Guido Michels; Martin Pin; Reimer Riessen; Annette Rogge; Jochen Taupitz; Uwe Janssens
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 3.  Triage.

Authors:  Michael D Christian
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Long-term survival of critically ill patients stratified by pandemic triage categories: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jai N Darvall; Rinaldo Bellomo; Michael Bailey; James Anstey; David Pilcher
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Allocation of intensive care resources during an infectious disease outbreak: a rapid review to inform practice.

Authors:  Kirsten M Fiest; Karla D Krewulak; Kara M Plotnikoff; Laryssa G Kemp; Ken Kuljit S Parhar; Daniel J Niven; John B Kortbeek; Henry T Stelfox; Jeanna Parsons Leigh
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 8.775

6.  Development of an algorithm to aid triage decisions for intensive care unit admission: a clinical vignette and retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Joao Gabriel Rosa Ramos; Beatriz Perondi; Roger Daglius Dias; Leandro Costa Miranda; Claudio Cohen; Carlos Roberto Ribeiro Carvalho; Irineu Tadeu Velasco; Daniel Neves Forte
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 7.  Triage of Scarce Critical Care Resources in COVID-19 An Implementation Guide for Regional Allocation: An Expert Panel Report of the Task Force for Mass Critical Care and the American College of Chest Physicians.

Authors:  Ryan C Maves; James Downar; Jeffrey R Dichter; John L Hick; Asha Devereaux; James A Geiling; Niranjan Kissoon; Nathaniel Hupert; Alexander S Niven; Mary A King; Lewis L Rubinson; Dan Hanfling; James G Hodge; Mary Faith Marshall; Katherine Fischkoff; Laura E Evans; Mark R Tonelli; Randy S Wax; Gilbert Seda; John S Parrish; Robert D Truog; Charles L Sprung; Michael D Christian
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Hospital preparedness during epidemics using simulation: the case of COVID-19.

Authors:  Daniel Garcia-Vicuña; Laida Esparza; Fermin Mallor
Journal:  Cent Eur J Oper Res       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 2.345

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.