Literature DB >> 22859970

Multi-locus variable number of tandem repeat analysis for rapid and accurate typing of virulent multidrug resistant Escherichia coli clones.

Umaer Naseer1, Barbro E Olsson-Liljequist, Neil Woodford, Hiran Dhanji, Rafael Cantón, Arnfinn Sundsfjord, Bjørn-Arne Lindstedt.   

Abstract

One hundred E. coli isolates from Norway (n = 37), Sweden (n = 24), UK (n = 20) and Spain (n = 19), producing CTX-M-type - (n = 84), or SHV-12 (n = 4) extended spectrum β-lactamases, or the plasmid mediated AmpC, CMY-2 (n = 12), were typed using multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) and multi-locus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA). Isolates clustered into 33 Sequence Types (STs) and 14 Sequence Type Complexes (STCs), and 58 MLVA-Types (MTs) and 25 different MLVA-Type Complexes (MTCs). A strong agreement between the MLST profile and MLVA typing results was observed, in which all ST131-isolates (n = 39) and most of the STC-648 (n = 10), STC-38 (n = 9), STC-10 (n = 9), STC-405 (n = 8) and STC-23 (n = 6) isolates were clustered distinctly into MTC-29, -36, -20, -14, -10 and -39, respectively. MLVA is a rapid and accurate tool for genotyping isolates of globally disseminated virulent multidrug resistant E. coli lineages, including ST131.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22859970      PMCID: PMC3407997          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Antibiotic resistance is a globally interrelated public health problem, the threat of which is ever increasing. Dispersion of large mobile genetic elements carrying multiple resistance determinants coupled with dissemination of successful clones have been chronicled in most bacterial species [1], [2]. Locally, antibiotic exposure selects and promotes the evolution of multidrug resistant (MDR) bacteria, [3], [4] and movement of people and transport of food facilitate their worldwide dispersion [5]. MDR bacteria both undermine empirical treatment and delay appropriate therapy, which in turn increases patient mortality [6]. Therefore preventing the spread of MDR bacteria is an infection control priority [2]. An integral part of infection control is the recognition of successful and emerging MDR strains or clones, and hence there is always a need for rapid and accurate typing tools. β-lactams belong to our most important and widely used class of antibiotics. Bacteria belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family have during the last decades evolved to enable carriage of multiple β-lactamases, including extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), plasmid mediated AmpC enzymes as well as carbapenemases such as VIM, NDM, KPC and OXA-48, which has compromised the clinical utility of β-lactam drugs [7]. In particular, Enterobacteriaceae strains carrying CTX-M type ESBLs have become prevalent and dominant worldwide [8], [9], [10], and clonal spread of CTX-M producing E. coli co-resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and ciprofloxacin are increasingly reported [11]. The worldwide emergence of the clone O25:H4 - ST131 as a dominant host of ESBLs poses huge public health challenges, and never have there been a greater need for a rapid detection and an intercontinental monitoring system for these clones [12], [13]. ST131 was originally identified using the Achtman multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) scheme [14], but faster methods, specific for the detection of ST131 have also been reported, including commercial repetitive sequence-based PCR (rep-PCR) [15], single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis of mdh and gyrB combined with O25b rfb [16], PCR approach using O25-pabB [17], and a ST131 CTX-M-15 specific triplex PCR for operon afa FM95545 [18]. Several studies have explored the use of tandem repeated DNA as mean for identification of different bacterial strains. Multi-locus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) has been successfully applied for rapid and interlaboratory typing of various bacteria such as Bacillus, Yersinia, Mycobacterium, Enterococcus, Staphylococcus, Neisseria, Salmonella and E. coli O157 [19]. In this study we explore the use of MLVA as a possible typing tool for different globally dispersed virulent multidrug resistant lineages of E. coli.

Materials and Methods

List of abbreviations and resistance genes given in Table 1.
Table 1

List of abbreviations and resistance genes.

bla β-lactamase
CTX-MCefotaximase - Munich
SHVSulfhydryl reagent variable
CMYCephamycinase
VIMVerona imipenemase
NDMNew Delhi metallo β-lactamase
KPCKlebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase
OXAOxacillinase
MLSTMulti-locus sequence typing
STSequence type
STCSequence type complex
MLVAMulti-locus variable number of tandem repeat analysis
MTMLVA type
MTCMLVA type complex
SLVSingle locus variant
DLVDouble locus variant
TLVTriple locus variant
QLVQuadruple locus variant

Bacterial Strains

A total of 100 well-characterised clinical E. coli isolates producing ESBLs- or plasmid-mediated AmpC were tested. They had been collected between year 2000–2008, from Norway (n = 37), Sweden (n = 24), UK (n = 20) and Spain (n = 19), and of these, 84 isolates were CTX-M producers [CTX-M-1 (n = 20), CTX-M-3 (n = 9), CTX-M-15 (n = 27), CTX-M-27 (n = 1), CTX-M-9 (n = 10) and CTX-M-14 (n = 17)], 12 were CMY-2 producers and 4 were SHV-12 producers (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Overview of the 100 E. coli isolates included in this study from the four participating countries, their sequence types and genotypes.

Multi-locus Sequence Typing (MLST)

MLST was performed according to the scheme developed by Achtmans group targeting seven housekeeping genes; adk, fumC, gyrB, icd, mdh, purA, and recA, Target genes were amplified and sequenced using primers and conditions described on the web-site (http://mlst.ucc.ie/) [14]. Furthermore, allele numbers were assigned; Sequence Types (ST) were generated and assigned to the different Sequence Type Complexes (STCs) using the web-site from the respective laboratories. Collected MLST data were entered into BioNumerics (Applied Maths, Foster City, California) for comparative analysis.

Multi-locus Variable Number of Tandem Repeat Analysis (MLVA)

Total DNA of E. coli was prepared from overnight cultures using the RT Spin Bacteria DNA minikit (Invitek, Berlin, Germany). MLVA was performed in a single laboratory by targeting nine tandem repeats (CVN001, CVN002, CVN003, CVN004, CVN007, CVN014, CVN015, CCR001 and CVN016) identified and described by Lindstedt et al. [20], [21]. Repeats were amplified using PCR and multiple flour-labelled primers discernible by a genetic analyser. PCR products were subjected to capillary electrophoresis on an ABI-3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Oslo, Norway). Each peak was identified according to colour and size, and an allele number was assigned based on fragment sizes. Alleles for which amplicons were absent were designated an allele number of ‘0’. The allele numbers were entered into BioNumerics as character values and a dendrogram was constructed using categorical coefficients and the Ward algorithm. Numerical values were assigned for distinct MLVA-type profiles (MTs) and MLVA-Type Complexes (MTCs) were assigned for related isolates of up to four locus variations.

Results

The 100 isolates were typed to 33 different Sequence Types (STs) and 14 different Sequence Type Complexes (STCs). A total of 81 of the 100 isolates were identified from 6 globally dispersed ST or STCs; i) ST131 (n = 39), ii) STC-648 (n = 10) spanning 3 different STs, iii) STC-38 (n = 9), spanning 2 different STs, iv) STC-10 (n = 9), spanning 4 different STs, v) STC-405 (n = 8), spanning 2 different STs, and vi) STC-23 (n = 6), spanning 4 different STs (Table 2). The remaining 19 isolates had 18 different STs which clustered into 9 different STCs (Table S1).
Table 2

Six major sequence type complexes (STCs) and sequence types (STs) in relation to assigned MLVA-types (MTs) and MLVA-type complexes (MTCs).

STCSTNo. (n) Isolates bla MTMTCLocus variation
None 13111CTX-M-156-0-0-10-3-4-1-6-029
1317CTX-M-36-0-0-10-3-4-1-6-029
1314CTX-M-16-0-0-10-3-4-1-6-029
1311CTX-M-96-0-0-10-3-4-1-6-029
1312CTX-M-16-0-0-10-3-8-1-6-029SLV 29 (CVN014)
1312CTX-M-156-0-0-10-3-3-1-6-029SLV 29 (CVN014)
1311CTX-M-16-0-0-10-2-4-1-6-029SLV 29 (CVN014)
1311CTX-M-16-0-0-10-3-11-1-6-029SLV 29 (CVN014)
1311CTX-M-16-0-0-10-3-7-1-6-029SLV 29 (CVN014)
1311CTX-M-96-0-0-10-3-10-1-6-029SLV 29 (CVN014)
1311CTX-M-156-0-0-10-3-2-1-6-029SLV 29 (CVN014)
1311CMY-26-0-0-10-3-5-1-6-029SLV 29 (CVN014)
1311CTX-M-12-0-0-10-3-4-1-6-029SLV 29 (CVN001)
1311CMY-26-3-0-10-3-4-1-6-029SLV 29 (CVN002)
1311CTX-M-16-0-0-6-3-4-1-6-029SLV 29 (CVN004)
1311CTX-M-96-0-0-10-3-6-1-39-029DLV 29 (CVN014, CCR001)
1311CMY-25-0-0-10-3-5-1-0-4129TLV 29 (CVN001, CVN014, CCR001)
1311CMY-26-3-0-8-3-5-1-6-729QLV 29 (CVN002, CVN004, CVN014, CVN016)
648 6482CTX-M-16-0-0-8-2-8-1-16-636
6481CTX-M-156-0-0-8-2-8-1-16-636
6481CMY-26-3-0-8-2-8-1-16-636SLV 36 (CVN002)
6481CTX-M-96-0-0-8-2-5-1-16-636SLV 36 (CVN014)
6481CTX-M-96-1-0-8-2-7-1-16-636DLV 36 (CVN002, CVN014)
6481CTX-M-16-18-0-8-2-7-1-16-636DLV 36 (CVN002, CVN014)
6481SHV-126-3-0-8-2-7-1-16-636DLV 36 (CVN002, CVN014)
6841CTX-M-155-0-7-0-3-1-1-6-06
621CTX-M-146-0-0-10-3-4-1-6-029
38 382CTX-M-145-3-0-10-3-8-1-64-2020
381CTX-M-95-3-0-10-3-8-1-64-2020
381CMY-25-3-0-10-3-8-1-64-1720SLV 20 (CVN016)
381CTX-M-15-3-0-10-3-7-1-64-1520DLV 20 (CVN014, CVN016)
381CTX-M-95-3-0-10-3-4-1-64-1020DLV 20 (CVN014, CVN016)
381CMY-25-3-0-10-3-7-1-64-1720DLV 20 (CVN014, CVN016)
381CTX-M-275-3-0-8-3-8-1-55-1720TLV 20 (CVN004, CCR001, CVN016)
7781CMY-26-0-0-10-3-10-1-6-025
10 1672CTX-M-155-10-7-8-3-1-1-6-714
1671CTX-M-145-10-7-8-3-1-1-6-714
1671CTX-M-145-8-8-8-4-1-1-6-714TLV 14 (CVN002, CVN003, CVN007)
6171CTX-M-145-10-7-8-3-1-1-6-714
101CTX-M-145-0-7-8-3-3-1-6-714DLV 14 (CVN002, CVN014)
101CMY-25-1-5-8-3-1-1-6-814TLV 14 (CVN002, CVN003, CVN016)
101CTX-M-145-0-0-8-3-5-1-35-05
481CTX-M-145-0-0-8-3-5-1-35-05
405 4051CMY-25-1-0-10-3-4-1-0-4710
4051CTX-M-155-1-0-10-3-4-1-0-4710
4051CTX-M-155-1-0-10-3-4-1-0-4410SLV 10 (CVN016)
4051CTX-M-35-1-0-10-3-4-1-64-010DLV 10 (CCR001, CVN016)
4051CTX-M-145-1-0-10-3-5-1-64-2110TLV 10 (CVN014, CCR001, CVN016)
9642CTX-M-155-1-0-10-3-4-1-64-2410DLV 10 (CCR001, CVN016)
4051CTX-M-155-3-0-9-3-3-1-95-1022
23 231SHV-126-0-0-8-3-5-1-6-039
4101CTX-M-156-0-0-8-3-5-1-6-039
881SHV-126-3-0-8-3-15-1-6-039DLV 39 (CVN002, CVN014)
901CTX-M-146-1-0-8-3-3-1-6-739TLV 39 (CVN002, CVN014, CVN016)
901CTX-M-36-1-0-8-3-4-1-6-739TLV 39 (CVN002, CVN014, CVN016)
881CMY-27-0-0-3-1-7-1-16-055

For complete data on all 100 isolates see Table S1.

For complete data on all 100 isolates see Table S1. The 100 isolates were typed to 58 different MLVA-types (MTs) and 25 different MLVA Complexes (MTCs) of related isolates. Isolates belonging to the six major STs or STCs were clustered as; i) ST131 (n = 39/39) and ST62 (n = 1/1) -isolates into MTC labelled 29, spanning 14 MTs, ii) STC-648 (n = 8/10) into MTC labelled 36, spanning 6 MTs, iii) STC-38 (n = 8/9) into MTC labelled 20, spanning 6 MTs, iv) STC-10 (n = 7/9) into MTC labelled 14, spanning 4 MTs v) STC-405 (n = 7/8) into MTC labelled 10, spanning 5 MTs, and vi) STC-23 (n = 5/6) into MTC labelled 39, spanning 4 MTs (Table 2). The remaining 26 isolates were distributed into 19 MTs (Table S1).

MLST and MLVA by Country and Genotypes

ST131 isolates (n = 39) were collected from Sweden (n = 14), UK (n = 12), Norway (n = 11), and Spain (n = 2), encoding β-lactamases CTX-M-1 (n = 11), CTX-M-3 (n = 7), CTX-M-15 (n = 14), CTX-M-9 (n = 3), and CMY-2 (n = 4). All 39 isolates were typed into a single MTC-29, with 24 identical isolates labelled MT29, 12 SLVs, 1 DLV, 1 TLV and 1 QLV (Table 2). Interestingly, 86% (n = 18/21) of the ST131 isolates with CTX-M-15 and its precursor CTX-M-3 producing isolates (all from the UK), had an indistinguishable MLVA genotype, MT29. Whereas greater MLVA diversity was seen among ST131 isolates with CTX-M-9 and CMY-2 enzymes. STC-648 isolates (n = 10) were collected from Sweden (n = 4), Norway (n = 3), UK (n = 2) and Spain (n = 1), encoding β-lactamases SHV-12 (n = 1), CTX-M-1 (n = 3), CTX-M-15 (n = 2), CTX-M-9 (n = 2), CTX-M-14 (n = 1), and CMY-2 (n = 1). The majority of the strains (n = 8) were grouped into a single MTC-36, consisting of six different MTs, varying exclusively at loci CVN002 and/or CVN014. The STC-38 isolates (n = 9) were collected only from Norway (n = 7) and Sweden (n = 2), encoding β-lactamases CTX-M-1 (n = 1), CTX-M-9 (n = 2), CTX-M-14 (n = 2), CTX-M-27 (n = 1) and CMY-2 (n = 3). Eight of these isolates were typed into MTC-20, consisting of six different MTs, varying at loci CVN014 and/or CVN016. All CTX-M-9 and CTX-M-14 isolates from Norway were grouped into a single genotype MT20. Isolates belonging to the STC-405 (n = 8) were collected from Norway (n = 5), Spain (n = 2) and UK (n = 1), encoding β-lactamases CTX-M-3 (n = 1), CTX-M-15 (n = 5), CTX-M-14 (n = 1) and CMY-2 (n = 1). Seven of the isolates were grouped into MTC-10, consisting of five different MTs, mainly varying at loci CCR001 and CVN016. The STC-10 isolates (n = 9) were collected from Spain (n = 5) and Norway (n = 4), encoding β-lactamases CTX-M-14 (n = 6), CTX-M-15 (n = 2) and CMY-2 (n = 1). Seven of these isolates were typed into MTC-14, and the remaining two CTX-M-14 producing isolates from Spain in MTC-5. The MTC-14 was consisting of four different MTs. Six isolates were collected from Spain (n = 3), Norway (n = 2) and UK (n = 1), encoding β-lactamases SHV-12 (n = 2), CTX-M-3 (n = 1), CTX-M-15 (n = 1), CTX-M-14 (n = 1), and CMY-2 (n = 1) of the STC-23. Five of the isolates were grouped into a single MTC-39, varying at loci CVN002, CVN014 and CVN016.

Discussion

In this study we document MLVA as a tool for rapid and accurate typing of internationally-dispersed virulent ESBL producing E. coli lineages, including ST131. Independently collected isolates from four countries during 9 years displayed high concordance between MLST types and MLVA types with an increased resolution (Figure 2). Interestingly, the MLVA typing scheme was in particular able to genotype the six major STs and STCs responsible for the pandemic spread of ESBLs, into six distinctly different MTCs. No country-specific clustering of isolates was seen. The variability within the nine different loci under investigation suggested that the present MLVA scheme and its combination of highly variable and conservative loci can accurately serve the purpose of genotyping these strains. We recognized that in our collection, locus CVN015 had none, and loci CVN003 and CVN007 had little discriminatory power. CVN003 was only present in nine isolates with three different alleles, and CVN007 was identified with only a single allele 3 in 87% of the isolates. Nevertheless these loci have in the past proven to be important markers for genotyping enteropathogenic E. coli of diverse serotypes [21]. It is here also interesting to highlight that alleles 10 and 8 at locus CVN004 seem to be conserved (93%) across all isolates of the major STs and STCs, and in an MLVA database of E. coli isolates (n = 3417), allele 10 at locus CVN004 is only present in 4% of the isolates (n = 139) including the strains from this study (personal database of Lindstedt). Thus, the particular alleles 8 and 10, at locus CVN004 seem to be important indicators for the presence of the major STCs and ST131.
Figure 2

Minimum-spanning tree analysis of MLVA data from 100 E. coli isolates.

The circles represent unique MLVA types (numeric values); the diameter of the circles represents number of isolates. MLST data on the strains are color-coded: STC-10 (fluorescent green), STC-12 (red), STC-14 (dark blue), STC-155 (yellow), STC-23 (light blue) STC-38 (dark green), STC-405 (brown), STC-648 (purple), ST131 (green), STC-683 (light green).

Minimum-spanning tree analysis of MLVA data from 100 E. coli isolates.

The circles represent unique MLVA types (numeric values); the diameter of the circles represents number of isolates. MLST data on the strains are color-coded: STC-10 (fluorescent green), STC-12 (red), STC-14 (dark blue), STC-155 (yellow), STC-23 (light blue) STC-38 (dark green), STC-405 (brown), STC-648 (purple), ST131 (green), STC-683 (light green). Currently, phenotypic detection of the ST131 clone is not possible and molecular-based techniques are required. Accurate detection is an important first step towards monitoring and controlling ST131 dissemination. ST131 E. coli producing CTX-M-15 are usually co-resistant to quinolones and aminoglycosides [22], [23], which leaves few therapeutic options against infections in human or animal [24], [25]. In recent years, NDM-1 and KPC-2 carbapenemase producing ST131 has also been reported, substantiating the need for a rapid detection method of this clone [26], [27]. Indeed, newer, faster and more comprehensive typing technology is being developed and introduced. In wait of full genome sequencing as an affordable and manageable tool for typing, promising alternative typing techniques for E. coli in addition to MLVA include DNA microarray [28], [29] and Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry, MALDI-TOF-MS [30]. Although these techniques are initially developed for accurate and rapid typing of specific pathogenic E. coli serotypes, they hold the potential for also typing MDR lineages of E. coli. Indeed, as we have successfully shown with the existing MLVA scheme; a potential for rapid, accurate and high resolution genotyping of ST131 and other internationally-dispersed, virulent multidrug resistant E. coli lineages. We have identified MLVA type complexes that correspond to the major MLST-defined complexes. Assuming extracted DNA and availability of all required equipment, the expected turnover time for MLVA of a single isolate is close to five hours, whereas it may require a couple of days for its complete MLST analysis. As such MLVA is a good alternative to MLST for epidemiological surveillance of virulent multidrug resistant E. coli in the future [2]. MLST and MLVA data on all 100 isolates included in this study. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  30 in total

Review 1.  The CTX-M beta-lactamase pandemic.

Authors:  Rafael Cantón; Teresa M Coque
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 7.934

Review 2.  The CTX-M conundrum: dissemination of plasmids and Escherichia coli clones.

Authors:  Umaer Naseer; Arnfinn Sundsfjord
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.431

Review 3.  Tackling antibiotic resistance: a dose of common antisense?

Authors:  Neil Woodford; David W Wareham
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Antibiotic coresistance in extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and in vitro activity of tigecycline.

Authors:  María-Isabel Morosini; María García-Castillo; Teresa M Coque; Aránzazu Valverde; Angela Novais; Elena Loza; Fernando Baquero; Rafael Cantón
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Co-resistance: an opportunity for the bacteria and resistance genes.

Authors:  Rafael Cantón; Patricia Ruiz-Garbajosa
Journal:  Curr Opin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 5.547

Review 6.  Emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance following exposure to antibiotics.

Authors:  Rafael Cantón; María-Isabel Morosini
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 16.408

7.  Determination of serotypes of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli isolates by intact cell matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Axel Karger; Mario Ziller; Barbara Bettin; Birgit Mintel; Susann Schares; Lutz Geue
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 8.  Multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria: the role of high-risk clones in the dissemination of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Neil Woodford; Jane F Turton; David M Livermore
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 16.408

9.  Epidemic clonal groups of Escherichia coli as a cause of antimicrobial-resistant urinary tract infections in Canada, 2002 to 2004.

Authors:  James R Johnson; Megan Menard; Brian Johnston; Michael A Kuskowski; Kim Nichol; George G Zhanel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Dissemination of clonally related Escherichia coli strains expressing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase CTX-M-15.

Authors:  Teresa M Coque; Angela Novais; Alessandra Carattoli; Laurent Poirel; Johann Pitout; Luísa Peixe; Fernando Baquero; Rafael Cantón; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Escherichia coli ST131, an intriguing clonal group.

Authors:  Marie-Hélène Nicolas-Chanoine; Xavier Bertrand; Jean-Yves Madec
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Global Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli (ExPEC) Lineages.

Authors:  Amee R Manges; Hyun Min Geum; Alice Guo; Thaddeus J Edens; Chad D Fibke; Johann D D Pitout
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Distribution of Genes Encoding Virulence Factors and the Genetic Diversity of Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC) Isolates from Patients with Diarrhea in Ahvaz, Iran.

Authors:  Ahmad Farajzadeh-Sheikh; Mohammad Savari; Khadijeh Ahmadi; Hossein Hosseini Nave; Mojtaba Shahin; Maryam Afzali
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  An outbreak of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) infection in Norway, 2012: a reminder to consider uncommon pathogens in outbreaks involving imported products.

Authors:  E MacDonald; K E Møller; A L Wester; U R Dahle; N O Hermansen; P A Jenum; L Thoresen; L Vold
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 4.434

5.  Occurrence of SHV, TEM and CTX-M β-Lactamase Genes Among Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Strains Isolated From Children With Diarrhea.

Authors:  Mojtaba Memariani; Shahin Najar Peerayeh; Taghi Zahraei Salehi; Seyyed Khalil Shokouhi Mostafavi
Journal:  Jundishapur J Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 0.747

6.  Sub-typing of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing isolates from a nosocomial outbreak: application of a 10-loci generic Escherichia coli multi-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis.

Authors:  Nahid Karami; Lisa Helldal; Christina Welinder-Olsson; Christina Ahrén; Edward R B Moore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Diverse high-risk B2 and D Escherichia coli clones depicted by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy.

Authors:  Clara Sousa; Ângela Novais; Ana Magalhães; João Lopes; Luísa Peixe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Epidemic potential of Escherichia coli ST131 and Klebsiella pneumoniae ST258: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M J D Dautzenberg; M R Haverkate; M J M Bonten; M C J Bootsma
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Subtyping β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains isolated from patients with UTI by MLVA and PFGE methods.

Authors:  Alireza Dolatyar Dehkharghani; Setareh Haghighat; Marjan Rahnamaye Farzami; Masoumeh Douraghi; Mohammad Rahbar
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 2.699

10.  "Population structure of drug-susceptible,-resistant and ESBL-producing Escherichia coli from community-acquired urinary tract".

Authors:  Frederik Boëtius Hertz; Jesper Boye Nielsen; Kristian Schønning; Pia Littauer; Jenny Dahl Knudsen; Anders Løbner-Olesen; Niels Frimodt-Møller
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.