Literature DB >> 22859674

PrCYP707A1, an ABA catabolic gene, is a key component of Phelipanche ramosa seed germination in response to the strigolactone analogue GR24.

Marc-Marie Lechat1, Jean-Bernard Pouvreau, Thomas Péron, Mathieu Gauthier, Grégory Montiel, Christophe Véronési, Yasushi Todoroki, Bruno Le Bizec, Fabrice Monteau, David Macherel, Philippe Simier, Séverine Thoiron, Philippe Delavault.   

Abstract

After a conditioning period, seed dormancy in obligate root parasitic plants is released by a chemical stimulus secreted by the roots of host plants. Using Phelipanche ramosa as the model, experiments conducted in this study showed that seeds require a conditioning period of at least 4 d to be receptive to the synthetic germination stimulant GR24. A cDNA-AFLP procedure on seeds revealed 58 transcript-derived fragments (TDFs) whose expression pattern changed upon GR24 treatment. Among the isolated TDFs, two up-regulated sequences corresponded to an abscisic acid (ABA) catabolic gene, PrCYP707A1, encoding an ABA 8'-hydroxylase. Using the rapid amplification of cDNA ends method, two full-length cDNAs, PrCYP707A1 and PrCYP707A2, were isolated from seeds. Both genes were always expressed at low levels during conditioning during which an initial decline in ABA levels was recorded. GR24 application after conditioning triggered a strong up-regulation of PrCYP707A1 during the first 18 h, followed by an 8-fold decrease in ABA levels detectable 3 d after treatment. In situ hybridization experiments on GR24-treated seeds revealed a specific PrCYP707A1 mRNA accumulation in the cells located between the embryo and the micropyle. Abz-E2B, a specific inhibitor of CYP707A enzymes, significantly impeded seed germination, proving to be a non-competitive antagonist of GR24 with reversible inhibitory activity. These results demonstrate that P. ramosa seed dormancy release relies on ABA catabolism mediated by the GR24-dependent activation of PrCYP707A1. In addition, in situ hybridization corroborates the putative location of cells receptive to the germination stimulants in seeds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22859674      PMCID: PMC3431000          DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ers189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


Introduction

Broomrape species (Orobanche spp. and Phelipanche spp.) are obligate root parasitic plants devoid of chlorophyll that exclusively depend on their hosts for their nutritional needs. Although most broomrape species develop in natural ecosystems with no significant damage on their host plants, some are harmful parasitic weeds in important crops. These pests include Orobanche cumana on sunflower, Orobanche crenata and Orobanche foetida on legumes, and Phelipanche ramosa and Phelipanche aegyptiaca on tomato (Parker, 2009). They all have an extraordinary capacity for dissemination because each individual plant may produce up to 500 000 extremely small seeds (between 200 µm and 400 µm) containing an acotyledoneous reduced embryo (Joel ). The weedy life cycle of broomrapes is well-described with regard to its major host plants (Joel ). Seed germination is induced by chemical signals exuded in the rhizosphere by host roots and leads to the emergence of a radicle that attaches to the host root surface. Most germination stimulants identified thus far belong to the strigolactone (SL) family (Yoneyama ), although dehydrocostus lactone, polyphenols, and isothiocyanates may be involved in the germination of O. cumana (Joel ), O. foetida (Evidente ), and P. ramosa (Auger ), respectively. Whatever the nature of the germination stimulant, several preparatory processes generally take place during a conditioning phase before the response to germination stimulants is possible (Joel ). Seed hydration (Joel ) and major metabolic pathways are initiated during seed conditioning, which thus displays a characteristic pattern of respiration, protein synthesis, and the utilization of reducing sugars (Bar-Nun and Mayer, 1993, 2002). However, some broomrape species may not require this conditioning phase (Plakhine ). SLs are a novel class of plant hormones involved in controlling shoot branching inhibition (Gomez-Roldan ; Umehara ). Several studies have investigated the SL signalling pathway in plants as well as the relationships between SLs and other phytohormones during the control of plant architecture. SLs interact with auxin and cytokinins (CK) in bud outgrowth control (Crawford ; Dun ) or during adventitious root initiation (Rasmussen ). In addition, cross-talk can occur between SLs, auxin, and ethylene in the control of root hair elongation (Kapulnik ). Finally, an ABC transporter has been shown to be a component of SL transport functioning as a cellular exporter (Kretzschmar ). By contrast, although the key role of SLs as germination stimulants has been known for several decades (Cook ), almost nothing is known about the early molecular events governing the germination of root parasitic plants in response to SLs, nor about how SLs interact with parasite phytohormones during this process. The isolation of SL receptors has remained elusive and their subcellular location is still unknown despite several structure–activity studies (Zwanenburg ). To date, the only systematic analysis of hormonal patterns in parasitic plant seeds was performed in Striga hermonthica, a chlorophyllous parasitic plant, and suggests that gibberellins (GA), abscisic acid (ABA), and CK are involved in seed germination (Toh ). In addition, several studies, mainly using pharmacological approaches, have shed light on the hormonal control of the seed response to germination stimulants. The application of GA biosynthesis inhibitors (e.g. uniconazole) during seed conditioning inhibits the subsequent germination of P. ramosa, P. aegyptiaca, and O. minor in response to the germination stimulants, GR24 and strigol (Zehhar ; Song ; Uematsu ) suggesting that broomrape seed germination takes place under the control of GA. Nevertheless, it has been demonstrated that compounds such as uniconazole are also potent inhibitors of ABA catabolism (Saito ). Thus, the inhibitory effect of uniconazole leading to persistent seed dormancy may also be due to enhanced levels of ABA in treated seed. Accordingly, exogenous ABA application inhibits P. ramosa seed germination (Zehhar ). In addition, 7 d conditioned seeds of O. minor show a massive reduction in ABA levels together with a high release in the medium before responding positively to germination stimulants (Chae ). These results suggest that broomrape seeds require a sufficiently low ABA content to germinate upon the application of germination stimulation. Ethylene has also been considered as a potential regulator of broomrape germination since the application of ethylene synthesis inhibitors during seed conditioning inhibits the subsequent germination of P. ramosa seeds in the presence of GR24 (Zehhar ). The molecular response of seeds to SLs has not been well investigated due to the lack of genomic resources in parasitic plants. However, the Parasitic Plant Genome Project (PPGP) has made progress recently and ESTs from key developmental stages of S. hermonthica and P. aegyptiaca have been identified (Westwood ). Here, the study starting from a genome-wide expression profiling (cDNA-AFLP) on P. ramosa—a closely related species to P. aegyptiaca—demonstrates the relationships between ABA catabolism and the expression of an ABA catabolism gene, PrCYP707A1, during the initiation of seed germination. The results indicate that PrCYP707A1 may be a major molecular component of the seed response to SLs in a root parasitic plant.

Materials and methods

Plant material and chemical treatments

P. ramosa L. Pomel seeds were collected in 2011 from mature flowering spikes growing on winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) in Saint-Martin-de-Fraigneau, France, and stored at 25 °C in darkness. P. ramosa seeds were surface-sterilized for 5min with 12% sodium hypochlorite and thoroughly rinsed three times with sterile distilled water. Seeds were then suspended in 1 mM Na/K phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) with a ratio of 10mg seeds ml– 1. Seeds were then placed in the dark at 21 °C during the conditioning period. Unless otherwise mentioned, the conditioning period was 7 d. The conditioned seeds were stimulated by adding the synthetic SL GR24 at a final concentration of 10– 9 M in 0.1% acetone. GR24 treatments were carried out at 21 °C in the dark. Corresponding control seeds were treated with 0.1% acetone. After these treatments, seeds were collected by filtration onto a 100 µm nylon mesh, blotted on absorbent paper and weighed. Seeds were then frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C before RNA, ABA or adenylate extraction. ABA 8'-hydroxylase (CYP707A) inhibitors abscinazole-E1 (Abz-E1) and abscinazole-E2B (Abz-E2B) (Okazaki , 2012) were solubilized in acetone and used for germination assays at various concentrations in 0.1% acetone.

Imbibition and adenylate energy charge determination

Seed imbibition was determined as described by Joel . Adenylate Energy Charge (AEC=ATP+0.5 ADP/AMP+ADP+ATP) was determined by quantifying adenine nucleotides extracted from 100mg of seeds, essentially as described by Borisjuk . AMP, ADP, and ATP were separated by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on an IonPac AS11 column (Dionex Corp., Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and quantification was done using a standard curve of known concentrations.

Germination assays

Seeds were conditioned by suspending around 100 sterilized seeds in 1mM Na/K phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) and distributing them in a 96-well plate (Cell Culture Multiwell Plate Cellstar; Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany), and then stored for 7 d at 21 °C in the dark. Abz-E1, Abz-E2B and/or GR24 solutions were added to each well and volumes were adjusted to 100 µl with sterile distilled water to 0.2% acetone (final concentration). A 0.2% acetone solution was used as a negative control. Subsequently, plates were incubated for 3 d at 21 °C in the dark and germinated seeds were counted under a stereo microscope (Olympus SZX10; Olympus Europa GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). Seeds were considered as germinated when the radicle protruded out of the seed coat. Each germination assay was repeated at least three times. For the ABA catabolism inhibitors (Abz-E1 and Abz-E2B) and GR24, IC50 and EC50 ±standard errors (SE), respectively, were determined from the dose–response curves [g=f(c), where g is the germination percentage as a function (f) of (c) concentration of the compound tested] and modelled with a four parameter logistic curve on at least three independent dilution ranges. Data were computed with SigmaPlot® V.10.0 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). An analysis of variance was performed on the results using SigmaPlot version 10.0 (P <0.05; Student–Newman–Keuls test, SNK). For seed viability tests following the addition of Abz-E1 and Abz-E2B, treated seeds were washed three times with 100 µl of 1mM Na/K phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) after an initial count. Then, 100 µl of 10– 9 GR24 in 0.1% acetone were applied to the washed seeds. Plates were incubated as mentioned above prior to the determination of germination percentage.

cDNA-AFLP analysis

Total RNA was extracted from 100mg of 7 d conditioned seeds (control) and conditioned seeds treated with GR24 for 2h and 6h, using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France). Extracts were treated with DNase I (0.02U µl–1, New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). The integrity of total RNA was checked by electrophoresis on a 2% (w/v) agarose gel and RNA was quantified spectrophotometrically (A260/280; NanoDrop Spectrophotometer ND-1000, Labtech International Ltd, Rigmer, UK). Starting from 2 µg of total RNA, the AFLP-based transcript profiling (cDNA-AFLP) was performed as described by Vuylsteke . All 32 possible primer combinations were performed. Selective [γ-33P] ATP-labelled amplification products were separated on 8% polyacrylamide gels with the Model S2001 apparatus (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK). Dried gels were exposed to Biomax film (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA).

Sequence analysis of TDFs

The GR24-regulated TDFs were recovered by PCR under the same conditions used for the pre-amplification. Purified PCR products were sequenced (Eurofins MWG Operon, Ebersberg, Germany) and a similarity search was done with BLASTN and BLASTX sequence alignments against the nucleotide and protein sequences in the available databases from the Parasitic Plant Genome Project (PPGP, http://ppgp.huck.psu.edu/) and The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR, http://www.arabidopsis.org/). Functional categorization of TDFs was done using the Blast2Go program (www.Blast2GO.de).

Cloning of PrCYP707A cDNAs

Total RNA isolated from 6h GR24-treated conditioned seeds underwent a reverse transcription procedure. cDNAs were synthesized from 0.5 µg of total RNA using the Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Degenerate and specific primers corresponding to highly conserved regions between P. aegyptiaca and S. hermonthica CYP707A sequences were designed. After denaturation at 94 °C for 5min, amplification consisted of 35 cycles of 45 s at 94 °C, 45 s at 55 °C, and 30 s, 45 s or 90 s at 72 °C. A final step of elongation was done at 72 °C for 5min. The amplified DNA fragments were purified and cloned into a pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Recombinant plasmid DNAs were sequenced. Based on these partial CYP707A sequences, new primers were generated for rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) of each fragment using the Generacer kit (Invitrogen). RACE products corresponding to different CYP707A-encoding genes were cloned and sequenced. To amplify the PrCYP707A full-length cDNAs, specific primer pairs were designed. Sequence data from this article can be found in the GenBank/EMBL databanks under accession numbers JQ838174 (PrCYP707A1) and JQ838175 (PrCYP707A2).

Real-time RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from 200mg of seeds and DNase I-treated using the same procedure as for the cDNA-AFLP analysis. cDNA was synthesised from 0.5 µg of total RNA using the Superscript II Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, 5ng of cDNA was used in 25 µl reactions containing 0.3 µM gene-specific primers and 6.25 µl platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix with ROX (Invitrogen). PCR reactions for three biological replicates were performed each in triplicate with a 7300 real-time PCR system according to the manufacturer's protocol (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Fold change in RNA expression was estimated using threshold cycles. The amplicon of the constitutive elongation factor PrEF1α1 (forward, 5'-AGTGCTCAGTGGTGGCTCAAC-3' and reverse, 5'-CTGGAGCAACAACCTTAATCTTC-3'), which showed low cycle threshold (Ct) variation (standard deviation <1 Ct), was used as an internal control to normalize all the data (Péron ). A control experiment without cDNA was included for each PCR mix. The following gene-specific primers were used: PrCYP707A1 (forward, 5'-GCCCGCTCTCAAAAGCTAAA-3' and reverse, 5'-TTGTAACAGATTTGGGCTTTTGG-3') and PrCYP707A2 (forward, 5'-TCCTCTTCCCCAAAATGGTTT-3' and reverse, 5'-TTTGGTTTTGGACACATGTTACTCTT-3'). An analysis of variance was performed on the results from qPCR analyses using SigmaPlot version 10.0. Means of three independent RNA isolations were tested at P <0.05 (SNK test).

PrCYP707A1 in situ hybridization

Digoxigenin (DIG)-labelled RNA probes were prepared using an in vitro transcription kit (Riboprobe Combination Systems, Promega, Madison, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The riboprobes were synthesized from the full-length PrCYP707A1 clone. Antisense and sense probes were transcribed from SP6 or T7 RNA polymerase promoters after linearisation of the vector with ApaI or NdeI, respectively. Samples of conditioned untreated or GR24-treated (6h) seeds were prepared and in situ hybridization experiments were performed as previously described (Péron ).

ABA quantification

ABA concentrations in seeds were determined according to Müller and Munné-Bosch (2011) with minor modifications. First, 200mg of seeds were ground in liquid nitrogen and extracted in acetonitrile:water:acetic acid (49.5:49.5:1, by vol.). D6-ABA, [(S)-5-[2H 6](1-hydroxy-2,6,6 -trimethyl-4-oxocyclohex-2-en-1-yl)-3-methyl-(2Z,4E)-pentadienoic acid)] was used as the internal standard and added in all samples (5×10-9 mol) and in non-labelled ABA standard calibration solutions (5×10–9 to 10–5 mol l–1). Analysis were performed on a liquid chromatograph Agilent 1200 series system (Agilent Technologies Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled to a LTQ OrbitrapMS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). A Hypersil GOLD column (100×2.1mm, 1.9 µm) equipped with a guard column (Phenomenex, Le Pecq, France) was used. Gradient elution was done with water:0.1% acetic acid (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). The gradient profile was linear and applied as follows: (t (min), % A): (0, 100%), (1, 100%), (10, 0%), (15, 0%), (18, 100%), (20, 100%). The flow rate was maintained constant at 0.5ml min–1. ABA and D6-ABA were ionized in an Atmospheric Pressure Ionization (API) source operated in the negative electrospray mode. Ion characterization was realized at a resolution better than 30 000 (FWHM). A mass accuracy better than 10 ppm was assured for parent ion (ABA: m/z, 263.1277856; rt=6.94±0.01min; D6-ABA: m/z, 269.166543; rt=6.92±0.02min). An analysis of variance was performed on the results from ABA quantification using SigmaPlot version 10.0. Means of six independent metabolite extractions were tested at P <0.05 (SNK test).

Results

GR24 response, imbibition, and energy metabolism of seeds during conditioning

Prior to germination, broomrape seeds require a conditioning period with moist conditions and suitable temperatures to be receptive to germination stimulants (Joel ). To evaluate the effect of conditioning period length on the GR24-triggered germination, conditioning periods ranging from 1–10 d were tested before seeds were treated with GR24 (Fig. 1A). Conditioning periods of 4 d or longer led to a statistically equivalent optimal germination response to GR24, ranging from 66±3 to 78±8% (ANOVA, P=0.287), whereas shorter conditioning periods from 0–3 d hampered seed germination. When conditioning was sufficiently long, seed germination, corresponding to the radicle protrusion out of the seed coat, was synchronous and occurred 3 d after adding GR24.
Fig. 1.

Characterization of ± SE. (B) Imbibition (squares) and adenylate energy charge (triangles) time-course during conditioning (open symbols and dotted line) and germination (filled symbols and solid line). Seeds were stimulated with 1nM GR24 after a 7 d conditioning period. Means are values ± SE.

Characterization of ± SE. (B) Imbibition (squares) and adenylate energy charge (triangles) time-course during conditioning (open symbols and dotted line) and germination (filled symbols and solid line). Seeds were stimulated with 1nM GR24 after a 7 d conditioning period. Means are values ± SE. Imbibition and AEC of seeds were determined during conditioning (Fig. 1B). P. ramosa seeds were fully imbibed after 1h of soaking (189±5% weight increase) and seed fresh weight remained constant over the next 10 d, in both untreated seeds and seeds treated with GR24 after the 7 d conditioning period. Along with rapid imbibition, a rapid and transient decrease in AEC was observed during the first hour of conditioning. AEC then increased and reached a maximum of 0.9 after 1 d of conditioning and remained constant for the next 9 d, for both GR24-treated seeds and the controls. These results indicate that, as of the first day of the conditioning period, seeds were fully hydrated and not limited in terms of energy metabolism, but unable to respond to GR24 before 4 d of conditioning. A standard 7 d conditioning period was chosen arbitrarily for the subsequent experiments.

Transcriptomic response of P. ramosa seeds to GR24

To investigate the early molecular response of P. ramosa seeds to GR24, the transcriptomic profiles of GR24-treated seeds (2h and 6h treatments) and non-GR24-treated seeds (control) were compared using cDNA-amplified fragment length polymorphism (Vuylsteke ). Both GR24-treatment triggered seed germination 3 d later. The 32 primer combinations produced some 2500 TDFs, of which 58 showed an apparent differential expression between samples, including 43 up-regulated genes and 15 down-regulated genes when compared with control levels. Among the 58 sequenced TDFs, 44 showed a significant BLAST hit to sequences found in public databases (Table 1), with 12 TDFs corresponding to unknown proteins. Functional categorization was done using the Blast2GO program. Analysing the 32 annotated sequences according to biological function revealed that, nearly one-third of the sequences (12) encode proteins involved in ‘stress responses’, followed by sequences encoding proteins involved in metabolic processes (9), nucleotide binding (4), oxidation-reduction processes (2), translation (1), transport (1), and, finally, unknown (3). Among the annotated TDFs, two (TDF30 and 37) corresponded to sequences encoding an ABA 8'-hydroxylase (cytochrome P450 CYP707A) that catalyses the C8'-hydroxylation of ABA to 8'-hydroxy-ABA and phaseic acid (Nambara and Marion-Poll, 2005). Compared with the control, both TDFs showed a strong up-regulation in seeds after 2h and 6h of GR24 treatment. Because CYP707A proteins belong to an enzyme family involved in the control of ABA levels during seed dormancy maintenance and breaking (Kushiro ; Saito ; Okamoto ), TDF30 and 37 were selected for further analysis.
Table 1.

List of TDFs modulated in P. ramosa conditioned seeds treated for 2h or 6h with GR24

TDF no.Regulationa Best Arabidopsis hit (Accession no.)Functional category E value
2 h6 h
1 + + Sulphite reductase (NP_196079)Oxidation–reduction processes2.00E–08
3 + + 60S ribosomal protein L8-3 (NP_195336)Translation3.00E–12
5 + OSucrose synthase 3 (NP_192137)Carbohydrate metabolic processes6.00E–30
6 High mobility group (HMG1/2) domain-containing rotein (NP_565788)Nucleotide binding8.00E–17
7O Ninja-family protein AFP3 (NP_189598)Nucleotide binding7.00E–19
8O + Peptidylprolyl isomerase ROF2 (NP_199668)Response to stress6.00E–22
11O + Heat shock protein 81.4 (NP_200411)Response to stress3.00E–65
13O + PPPDE putative thiol peptidase family protein (NP_187365)Unknown1.00E–24
14O + Rossmann-fold NAD(P)-binding domain-containing protein (NP_175552)Oxidation–reduction processes 1.00E–16
15 + OAldolase-type TIM barrel family protein (AED97862)Response to stress 8.00E–15
16 + + Phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein (NP_195750)Unknown0.001
20 + O Trans-cinnamate 4-monooxygenase (NP_180607)Secondary metabolic processes0.006
26 + OHIPL2 protein (NP_201069)Carbohydrate metabolic processes3.00E–08
28 + + Methionine synthase 2 (NP_001118564)Cellular amino acid metabolic processes3.00E–21
30 + + Abscisic acid 8'-hydroxylase 1 (NP_974574 )Response to stress0.007
31 + OAcetylornithine deacetylase (NP_001190758)Protein metabolic processes0.091
32 26S proteasome regulatory subunit 4-A (NP_194633)Protein metabolic processes1
33 + + RNA recognition motif-containing protein (NP_197436)Nucleotide binding2.00E–23
36O + Heat shock 70kDa protein 1 (NP_195870)Response to stress0.073
37 + + Abscisic acid 8'-hydroxylase 1 (NP_974574)Response to stress0.001
38O BI1-like protein (NP_567466)Unknown3.00E–16
39 + + Heat shock protein 81-1 (NP_200076)Response to stress 3.00E–23
40 + OPutative aquaporin TIP3-2 (NP_173223)Transport6.00E–50
41 + + Beta-glucosidase 44 (NP_188436)Carbohydrate metabolic processes5.00E–41
42 + + 5-methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate homocysteine methyltransferase
    (NP_197294)Cellular amino acid metabolic processes1.00E–16
44O + Glutathione S-transferase PM24 (NP_192161)Response to stress6.00E–06
45O + Heat shock protein 21 (NP_194497)Response to stress0.02
48 + OSplicing factor U2af large subunit B (NP_176287)Nucleotide binding1.00E–06
49 + OCatalase 2 (NP_195235)Response to stress1.00E–48
50 + OHeat shock protein 70B (NP_173055)Response to stress1.00E–79
51 + OPhenylalanine ammonia-lyase 3 (NP_001190223)Response to stress6.00E–10
58O + Putative xyloglucan glycosyltransferase 8 (NP_180039)Carbohydrate metabolic processes1.00E–26

aCompared with the non-treated control sample, (+) corresponds to an up-regulation, (–) a down-regulation, and (O) no change

List of TDFs modulated in P. ramosa conditioned seeds treated for 2h or 6h with GR24 aCompared with the non-treated control sample, (+) corresponds to an up-regulation, (–) a down-regulation, and (O) no change

Molecular cloning of CYP707A homologuesin P. ramosa

Sixty-three and 25 ESTs correspond to putative sequences encoding a cytochrome P450 CYP707A in P. aegyptiaca and S. hermonthica EST libraries (PPGP database), respectively. Using alignment and contig procedures, three full-length cDNA sequences (PaCYP707A1, PaCYP707A2, and PaCYP707A3) were identified in P. aegyptiaca and two full-length (ShCYP707A1 and ShCYP707A2) and one partial (ShCYP707A3) cDNA sequences in S. hermonthica. Based on these sequences, several sets of primers were designed and used in RACE experiments, leading to the identification of two full-length P. ramosa cDNA sequences of 1770 (PrCYP707A1) and 1645bp (PrCYP707A2). Despite several attempts, amplification of a sequence corresponding to PaCYP707A3 was unsuccessful. Possible reasons include that the corresponding gene is not present in P. ramosa or is not expressed at the times tested or exhibits a divergent sequence. The predicted amino-acid sequences of the PrCYP707A1 and PrCYP707A2 genes showed high sequence identity with each other (77.6%), and with AtCYP707A3 (74.1%) and AtCYP707A1 (73.5%), respectively, when compared with the four Arabidopsis CYP707A protein sequences. Sequence comparison did not allow the attribution of Arabidopsis orthologues to both P. ramosa sequences. Both TDF30 and TDF37 corresponded to PrCYP707A1.

Change in PrCYP707A gene expression inP. ramosa seeds after GR24 treatment

After conditioning, the expression patterns of PrCYP707A1 and PrCYP707A2 were examined in detail during a 3 d GR24 treatment (Fig. 2). While levels of PrCYP707A2 mRNA were low and did not change upon GR24 treatment (data not shown), the expression level of PrCYP707A1 showed a rapid and strong significant increase as of 1h (Fig. 2A) and reached a peak 18h (Fig. 2B) after the addition of GR24. After 24h, PrCYP707A1 mRNA levels dropped, reaching a value similar to that observed the first 30min, and remained stable for the next 48h.
Fig. 2.

Time-course of PrCYP707A1 expression in 7 d conditioned seeds treated with 1nM GR24. (A) Time-course during a GR24 treatment of 6h. (B) Time-course during a GR24 treatment of 3 d. Means are values ±SD (n=6). Means denoted by the same letter do not differ significantly at P <0.05 (SNK test).

Time-course of PrCYP707A1 expression in 7 d conditioned seeds treated with 1nM GR24. (A) Time-course during a GR24 treatment of 6h. (B) Time-course during a GR24 treatment of 3 d. Means are values ±SD (n=6). Means denoted by the same letter do not differ significantly at P <0.05 (SNK test).

PrCYP707A1 is up-regulated by GR24 after a minimum conditioning period

First, the expression patterns of PrCYP707A1 and PrCYP707A2 were examined during conditioning. No change in mRNA accumulation of either gene was recorded (data not shown). Because P. ramosa seeds were receptive to GR24 after a minimum 4 d conditioning period (Fig. 1A), the expression of PrCYP707A1 and PrCYP707A2 were examined in 6h GR24-treated seeds after various conditioning periods (1, 3, 5, and 7 d) (Fig. 3). In seeds that underwent 1 d and 3 d of conditioning, GR24 triggered neither germination nor PrCYP707A1 mRNA accumulation. By contrast, PrCYP707A1 was significantly up-regulated in GR24-stimulated seeds that were conditioned for 5 d and 7 d, with germination percentages of 72±6% and 77±2%, respectively. Whatever the conditioning period, PrCYP707A2 did not exhibit any major change in its expression level.
Fig. 3.

Expression of PrCYP707A1 and PrCYP707A2 in seeds conditioned for 1, 3, 5 or 7 d and then treated for 6h with 1nM GR24. Means are values ± SD (n=6). For each gene, means denoted by the same letter do not differ significantly at P <0.05 (SNK test).

Expression of PrCYP707A1 and PrCYP707A2 in seeds conditioned for 1, 3, 5 or 7 d and then treated for 6h with 1nM GR24. Means are values ± SD (n=6). For each gene, means denoted by the same letter do not differ significantly at P <0.05 (SNK test).

GR24 induces PrCYP707A1 mRNA accumulation in cells close to the micropyle

Seeds strongly accumulated PrCYP707A1 transcripts during the first 18h of GR24 treatment (Fig. 2). In situ hybridization experiments were performed on longitudinal sections of 6h GR24-treated seeds to localize this accumulation spatially (Fig. 4). To allow better visualization and identification of the different parts of 6h GR24-treated seeds (cf. Joel ), a seed section was stained with toluidine blue (Fig. 4A). Positive hybridization with the specific antisense probe indicated PrCYP707A1 transcript accumulation (Fig. 4C, 4D), whereas no signal was observed after hybridization with the sense probe (Fig. 4B). In 7 d conditioned seeds, transcripts accumulated mainly in the embryo cells facing the micropyle (Fig. 4C). By contrast, PrCYP707A1 mRNA accumulated markedly in the cells near the micropyle in 6h GR24-treated seeds, whereas no staining was detected in the embryo cells (Fig. 4D). According to Joel , these stained cells may correspond to perisperm tissue. These results indicate that GR24 induced a change in the spatial localization of PrCYP707A1 expression in seeds.
Fig. 4.

localization of PrCYP707A1 transcripts in longitudinal sections of P. ramosa seeds. (A) Section stained with toluidine blue for visualization of seed anatomy: M, micropyle; Em, embryo; En, endosperm; P, perisperm; SC, seed coat (Joel ). Seeds were conditioned for 7 d (A, B, C) and treated for 6h with 1nM GR24 (D). Sections were hybridized with the sense probe as a negative control (B) and with the antisense probe (C, D). Positive hybridization signals are indicated by brown-violet staining (arrows) using a digoxigenin-labelled RNA immunodetection system. Bars, 50 µm.

localization of PrCYP707A1 transcripts in longitudinal sections of P. ramosa seeds. (A) Section stained with toluidine blue for visualization of seed anatomy: M, micropyle; Em, embryo; En, endosperm; P, perisperm; SC, seed coat (Joel ). Seeds were conditioned for 7 d (A, B, C) and treated for 6h with 1nM GR24 (D). Sections were hybridized with the sense probe as a negative control (B) and with the antisense probe (C, D). Positive hybridization signals are indicated by brown-violet staining (arrows) using a digoxigenin-labelled RNA immunodetection system. Bars, 50 µm.

Change in seed ABA levels during conditioning and GR24 treatment

ABA levels in seeds were determined during the 7 d conditioning period and the following 3 d GR24 treatment. A 6.3-fold decrease in ABA content occurred during the first day of conditioning (Fig. 5). Although no significant decrease was observed in seeds during the next 6 d of conditioning, a second, 8-fold drop in ABA content was observed specifically in 3 d GR24-treated seeds compared with 10 d conditioned seeds. Interestingly, this decline in ABA levels in GR24-treated seeds followed the up-regulation of PrCYP707A1 occurring during the first 18h of GR24 treatment (Fig. 2).
Fig. 5.

Change in ABA levels during seed conditioning and GR24-triggered germination over time. Seeds without GR24 treatment (black bars) and with 1nM GR24 added on day 7 of conditioning (white bars). Means are values ± SE. Means denoted by the same letter do not differ significantly at P <0.05 (SNK test).

Change in ABA levels during seed conditioning and GR24-triggered germination over time. Seeds without GR24 treatment (black bars) and with 1nM GR24 added on day 7 of conditioning (white bars). Means are values ± SE. Means denoted by the same letter do not differ significantly at P <0.05 (SNK test).

Abz-E1 and Abz-E2B inhibit GR24-triggered seed germination of P. ramosa

The preponderant role of ABA catabolism in the GR24-dependent germination of P. ramosa seeds was confirmed by using two CYP707A inhibitors, Abz-E1 and Abz-E2B (Okazaki , 2012). When 7 d conditioned seeds were treated for 3 d with 10–9 M GR24 together with Abz-E1 or Abz-E2B at various concentrations, seed germination was inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner. Inhibition was maximal at 100 µM, 84±5% and 90±3% for Abz-E1 or Abz-E2B, respectively, with IC50 reaching 30±16 µM and 17±9 µM, respectively (data not shown). The most effective inhibitor, Abz-E2B was used for further experiments. Using GR24 concentrations ranging from 10-12 to 10-7 M with Abz-E2B concentrations ranging from 10–6 to 10–4 M, no GR24 concentration was able to overcome Abz-E2B inhibition (Fig. 6A). IC50 values ranged insignificantly from 8.3 µM and 17 µM according to GR24 concentration (ANOVA, P=0.877). Germination inhibition was total with 100 µM Abz-E2B and 10–12 M GR24. Increasing concentrations of Abz-E2B did not significantly modify the EC50 of GR24 (values ranging from 0.9nM to 11.3nM; ANOVA, P=0.181) (Fig. 6B). This indicates that Abz-E2B did not interfere with the perception of the germination stimulant. Significant reduction in the maximum germination percentage was observed with Abz-E2B concentrations of 5 µM or higher (ANOVA, P <0.001). To ensure that the Abz-E2B inhibition of germination was not due to seed mortality, treated seeds were subsequently washed with distilled water and treated once again with GR24 in the absence of the inhibitor. Once washed, the seeds showed a germination rate similar to that of untreated seeds (data not shown). Taken together, these results demonstrate that, with regard to germination, Abz-E2B acts as a non-competitive antagonist of GR24 with reversible inhibitory activity.
Fig. 6.

Abz-E2B inhibition of P. ramosa seed germination. (A) Abz-E2B IC50 curve of the concentration response of P. ramosa seed germination at different GR24 concentrations. (B) GR24 EC50 curve of the concentration response of P. ramosa seed germination at different Abz-E2B concentrations. All data are reported as means ± SE.

Abz-E2B inhibition of P. ramosa seed germination. (A) Abz-E2B IC50 curve of the concentration response of P. ramosa seed germination at different GR24 concentrations. (B) GR24 EC50 curve of the concentration response of P. ramosa seed germination at different Abz-E2B concentrations. All data are reported as means ± SE.

Discussion

Germination of obligate root parasitic plants is stimulated by the perception of secondary metabolites released from the roots of a potential host plant (Estabrook and Yoder, 1998). Among the germination stimulants identified so far, SLs have been the most extensively studied (Yoneyama ). In addition to their capacity to induce broomrape seed germination at nanomolar concentrations, SLs are host recognition signals for symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Besserer ) and constitute new plant hormones that inhibit shoot branching (Gomez-Roldan ; Umehara ). Although much progress has been made on the signalling activities of SLs in non-parasitic plants, the signalling pathway triggered by SLs leading to broomrape seed germination remains unclear. Here, early transcriptome modifications of P. ramosa seeds triggered by a synthetic SL, the germination stimulant GR24, were studied using an AFLP-based transcript profiling procedure (Vuylsteke ). The overall results from the cDNA-AFLP experiments indicate that GR24 does not induce massive modification of the transcriptome because, among the 2500 TDFs visualized on gels, only 58 showed significant differential expression between the control and the 2h and 6h GR24-treated samples. Two of the most distinct TDFs, in terms of expression pattern and biologically significant association with germination, corresponded to a CYP707A gene encoding an ABA 8'-hydroxylase (Table 1). Interestingly, an AtCYP707A gene has been already shown to be up-regulated in Arabidopsis seedlings treated with GR24 (Mashiguchi ). Based on both TDF sequences, a search in the Parasitic Plant Genome Project databank uncovered three distinct CYP707A sequences in P. aegyptiaca and S. hermonthica. RACE-PCR strategies revealed two CYP707A full-length cDNAs, named PrCYP707A1 and PrCYP707A2. ABA is known to play a major role in seed dormancy and germination (Koornneef ). Its hormonal action is controlled by a fine-tuned balance between biosynthesis and catabolism (Nambara and Marion-Poll, 2005). Seed dormancy maintenance involves ABA synthesis (Finkelstein ) whereas a decrease in ABA content triggered by after-ripening, stratification, and other dormancy-releasing mechanisms promote the germination process in dormant seeds (Gubler ). Thus, dormancy release relies mainly on ABA catabolism by specific ABA 8'-hydroxylases encoded by the cytochrome P450 CYP707A family (Kushiro ; Saito ; Okamoto ). ABA 8'-hydrolases catalyse ABA hydroxylation and produce 8'-hydroxy ABA which is then spontaneously isomerized to phaseic acid (Nambara and Marion-Poll, 2005). CYP707A-related sequences have been characterized in many plant species. For instance, four genes encoding CYP707A activity have been identified in Arabidopsis (Kushiro ; Saito ) and two in barley (Millar ). Among the four Arabidopsis sequences, AtCYP707A2 is up-regulated in association with a rapid decrease in ABA content during seed imbibition. Seeds of a cyp707a2 mutant were hyperdormant and accumulated 6-fold higher ABA levels than the wild type (Kushiro ; Millar ), whereas constitutive expression of AtCYP707A1 in Arabidopsis results in decreased ABA levels in seeds along with dramatically reduced dormancy (Millar ). Similarly, ABA content in barley is higher in embryos of after-ripened dormant seeds than of non-dormant seeds in association with higher HvCYP707A1 expression levels in non-dormant compared to dormant seeds (Millar ). Altogether, these results highlight the major role of CYP707A genes in regulating the ABA level during seed dormancy and release. In root parasitic plants, the control of ABA levels is also thought to be involved in the seed germination process (Zehhar ; Chae ). In the present study, a strong decrease in ABA levels in P. ramosa seeds occurred during the first day of conditioning (Fig. 5). This decrease was maintained to a lesser extent for the next 6 d of conditioning. Interestingly, neither gene, PrCYP707A1 nor PrCYP707A2, exhibited any change in their expression levels during the 7 d conditioning period (data not shown). Based on these results, the decrease in ABA levels in conditioned P. ramosa seeds does not seem to be associated with ABA catabolism, but rather with ABA release in the medium as previously demonstrated in the 1 d conditioned seeds of O. minor (Chae ). The present study shows that GR24 treatment, following conditioning, induced a second decrease in the ABA levels in seeds (Fig. 5). These results suggest that GR24 promotes a sufficient and necessary reduction in ABA content for P. ramosa seed germination. Accordingly, when exogenous ABA is applied during conditioning and GR24 treatments, germination of P. ramosa seeds is inhibited (Zehhar ). Here, the second ABA reduction in response to GR24 was associated with the strong and rapid up-regulation of PrCYP707A1 that started as early as 1h after the addition of GR24 and persisted with increasing intensity for 18h (Fig. 2). By contrast, PrCYP707A2 did not show any change in its expression during the 72h GR24 treatment. These findings indicate that conditioned P. ramosa seeds can germinate only after endogenous ABA content reaches a sufficiently low level through CYP707A-dependent catabolism triggered by GR24. The important role of CYP707A genes in the regulation of ABA levels and dormancy release in response to environmental cues has already been investigated in non-parasitic plant: exogenous nitrate and light, two seed dormancy releasing stimuli in Arabidopsis, induce an up-regulation of AtCYP707A2 (Seo ; Matakiadis ). A PrCYP707A1-dependent release of dormancy in P. ramosa seeds appears to rely on the perception of another environmental cue: the exogenous germination stimulant produced by the host plant. This primordial role of CYP707A1 in P. ramosa seed germination was confirmed by the application of specific inhibitors of ABA 8'-hydroxylase, Abz-E1 and Abz-E2B (Okazaki , 2012) on conditioned seeds together with GR24 (Fig. 6). These inhibitors prevented seed germination. Abz-E1 and Abz-E2B correspond to structural analogues of uniconazole, which has been shown to inhibit the germination of P. ramosa, O. aegyptiaca, and O. minor seeds when applied during conditioning (Zehhar ; Song ; Uematsu ). This study now provides evidence that uniconazole inhibited broomrape seed germination by inhibiting both gibberellin synthesis and ABA catabolism. To be receptive to germination stimulants, broomrape seeds require a preparatory phase of several days called the conditioning period (Joel ). The present study demonstrated that P. ramosa seeds require a minimum of 4 d of conditioning to allow optimal germination in response to GR24 (Fig. 1A). At first glance, this result contradicts a previous study that concluded that P. aegyptiaca, a closely related species, does not need conditioning to respond to germination stimulants (Plakhine ). However, non-conditioned P. aegyptiaca seeds stimulated by GR24 only germinate after 7 d, a period that may correspond to a 4 d conditioning period and a 3 d germination process, as reported for P. ramosa seeds here. This study showed that the conditioning period starts with seed imbibition that takes around 1h and optimal AEC (0.9) is reached as of first day of conditioning (Fig. 1B). This rapid imbibition is obtained by water entering the seed through the micropyle which opens after 30min (Joel ). Thus, the inability of P. ramosa seeds to respond to GR24 during the first 4 d of conditioning cannot be attributed to a defect in seed hydration nor in energy status of the embryo. An analysis of the expression pattern of PrCYP707A1 in seeds treated for 6h with GR24 demonstrated that PrCYP707A1 expression was not up-regulated until a conditioning period of 5 d or more (Fig. 3). Taken together, these results suggest that P. ramosa seeds do not have physical dormancy and that the minimal conditioning period may correspond to physiological processes resulting in the set-up of the machinery needed for GR24 perception and signalling leading to PrCYP707A1 over-expression. A recent study on the inheritance of the germination control in P. aegyptiaca seeds suggests that receptors of germination stimulants are located in the living perisperm cells beneath the micropyle (Plakhine ). The in situ hybridization experiments support this hypothesis since, upon GR24 treatment, PrCYP707A1 mRNA accumulated rapidly and specifically in similar cells in P. ramosa seeds (Fig. 4). Moreover, such rapid accumulation triggered 1h after GR24 application can be attributed to the location of these cells, which are readily accessible to the germination stimulant entering through the micropyle. One question that remains is how the germination stimulant activates the signalling pathway leading to rapid transcriptional activation of the PrCYP707A1 gene. Expression of AtCYP707A2 has been shown to be regulated by exogenous nitrate, which releases seed dormancy in Arabidopsis (Matakiadis ). The nitrate control of seed dormancy is known to proceed via the production of nitric oxide (NO) (Bethke ). In this context, Liu et al. (2009, 2010) demonstrated in Arabidopsis that hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and NO are involved in the up-regulation of the AtCYP707A2 gene and the subsequent decrease in ABA levels during seed imbibition. Interestingly, the cDNA-AFLP procedure also identified two TDFs (44 and 49) putatively encoding a GST and a catalase in P. ramosa GR24-treated seeds, suggesting that oxidative stress may have occurred upon GR24 stimulation. The possible involvement of NO and H2O2 in SL signalling and PrCYP707A1 activation, as well as the occurrence of oxidative stress during P. ramosa seed germination, are currently under investigation. The cDNA-AFLP procedure proved to be a powerful tool to identify candidate genes involved in the response of P. ramosa, a non-model plant, to the germination stimulant GR24. In addition to PrCYP707A1, other revealed TDFs may correspond to genes putatively involved in this process (Table 1). For instance, the Arabidopsis genes similar to TDF11-39 and TDF36-50 encode heat shock proteins, HSP90 and HSC70, respectively, known to form a molecular complex that modulates ABA-dependent physiological responses such as stomatal closure and seed germination (Clément ). Interestingly, the Arabidopsis proteins peptidylprolyl isomerase ROF1 and ROF2, also called AtFKBP64 and AtFKBP65, corresponding to TDF8, have been shown to bind to HSP90 (Aviezer-Hagai ). Similarly, FK506 binding proteins (FKBP) are thought to play a major role in seed germination of sorghum (Sharma and Singh, 2003). Moreover, TDF7 may correspond to a member of a small plant-specific protein family, ABI five binding proteins (AFPs), which interact with the transcription factor ABA-insensitive5 (ABI5), a key regulator of ABA signalling and stress response in Arabidopsis seeds (Garcia ). Finally, TDF20 and TDF51 correspond to two sequences encoding a cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H) and a phenyl ammonia lyase (PAL), respectively, involved in phenylpropanoid synthesis. In Arabidopsis, both C4H and PAL2 genes have been shown to be transiently induced in seeds exposed to the germination stimulants karrikins identified in smoke from wildfires (Nelson ). Interestingly, karrikins and GR24 signalling require the same F-box protein MAX2 in Arabidopsis germination and shoot branching processes, respectively (Nelson ). Thus, all these putative candidate genes deserve further study to investigate their potential implication in P. ramosa seed germination. In summary, GR24 triggered the dormancy release of P. ramosa seeds by activating a strong and rapid up-regulation of an ABA-catabolic gene PrCYP707A1 that occurs in association with a reduction in ABA levels. However, release from dormancy was shown to require a minimum conditioning period since germination and the activation of PrCYP707A1 expression only occurred 4 d post imbibition. The results on the spatial and temporal expression of PrCYP707A1 corroborate previous studies suggesting that putative receptors of parasitic plant germination stimulants are effective following a conditioning period and are located in the cells between the embryo and the micropyle. How GR24 triggers the ABA decline leading to the P. ramosa seed germination requires further study, as does the possible implication of gibberellins since antagonism between ABA and GA plays a key role in controlling seed germination. © 2012 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  45 in total

1.  F-box protein MAX2 has dual roles in karrikin and strigolactone signaling in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  David C Nelson; Adrian Scaffidi; Elizabeth A Dun; Mark T Waters; Gavin R Flematti; Kingsley W Dixon; Christine A Beveridge; Emilio L Ghisalberti; Steven M Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Polyphenols, including the new Peapolyphenols A-C, from pea root exudates stimulate Orobanche foetida seed germination.

Authors:  Antonio Evidente; Alessio Cimmino; Monica Fernández-Aparicio; Anna Andolfi; Diego Rubiales; Andrea Motta
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 5.279

3.  Abscinazole-E2B, a practical and selective inhibitor of ABA 8'-hydroxylase CYP707A.

Authors:  Mariko Okazaki; Monrudee Kittikorn; Kotomi Ueno; Masaharu Mizutani; Nobuhiro Hirai; Satoru Kondo; Toshiyuki Ohnishi; Yasushi Todoroki
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  H2O2 mediates the regulation of ABA catabolism and GA biosynthesis in Arabidopsis seed dormancy and germination.

Authors:  Yinggao Liu; Nenghui Ye; Rui Liu; Moxian Chen; Jianhua Zhang
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  CYP707A1 and CYP707A2, which encode abscisic acid 8'-hydroxylases, are indispensable for proper control of seed dormancy and germination in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Masanori Okamoto; Ayuko Kuwahara; Mistunori Seo; Tetsuo Kushiro; Tadao Asami; Nobuhiro Hirai; Yuji Kamiya; Tomokazu Koshiba; Eiji Nambara
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 6.  Structure and function of natural and synthetic signalling molecules in parasitic weed germination.

Authors:  Binne Zwanenburg; Alinanuswe S Mwakaboko; Anat Reizelman; Gopinathan Anilkumar; Divakaramenon Sethumadhavan
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.845

7.  Germination of Witchweed (Striga lutea Lour.): Isolation and Properties of a Potent Stimulant.

Authors:  C E Cook; L P Whichard; B Turner; M E Wall; G H Egley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1966-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Strigolactones suppress adventitious rooting in Arabidopsis and pea.

Authors:  Amanda Rasmussen; Michael Glenn Mason; Carolien De Cuyper; Philip B Brewer; Silvia Herold; Javier Agusti; Danny Geelen; Thomas Greb; Sofie Goormachtig; Tom Beeckman; Christine Anne Beveridge
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Rapid and sensitive hormonal profiling of complex plant samples by liquid chromatography coupled to electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Maren Müller; Sergi Munné-Bosch
Journal:  Plant Methods       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 4.993

10.  Low oxygen sensing and balancing in plant seeds: a role for nitric oxide.

Authors:  Ljudmilla Borisjuk; David Macherel; Abdelilah Benamar; Ulrich Wobus; Hardy Rolletschek
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007-10-12       Impact factor: 10.151

View more
  29 in total

Review 1.  Biotic interactions in the rhizosphere: a diverse cooperative enterprise for plant productivity.

Authors:  Clelia De-la-Peña; Víctor M Loyola-Vargas
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Abscisic Acid Is a General Negative Regulator of Arabidopsis Axillary Bud Growth.

Authors:  Chi Yao; Scott A Finlayson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Osmotic stress represses strigolactone biosynthesis in Lotus japonicus roots: exploring the interaction between strigolactones and ABA under abiotic stress.

Authors:  Junwei Liu; Hanzi He; Marco Vitali; Ivan Visentin; Tatsiana Charnikhova; Imran Haider; Andrea Schubert; Carolien Ruyter-Spira; Harro J Bouwmeester; Claudio Lovisolo; Francesca Cardinale
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.116

4.  Holoparasitic plant-host interactions and their impact on Mediterranean ecosystems.

Authors:  Andrea Casadesús; Sergi Munné-Bosch
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 5.  Using biotechnological approaches to develop crop resistance to root parasitic weeds.

Authors:  Radi Aly; Maor Matzrafi; Vinay Kumar Bari
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.116

6.  The role of strigolactones in P deficiency induced transcriptional changes in tomato roots.

Authors:  Yanting Wang; Hernando G Suárez Duran; Jan C van Haarst; Elio G W M Schijlen; Carolien Ruyter-Spira; Marnix H Medema; Lemeng Dong; Harro J Bouwmeester
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 4.215

Review 7.  The mechanism of host-induced germination in root parasitic plants.

Authors:  David C Nelson
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Molecular actors of seed germination and haustoriogenesis in parasitic weeds.

Authors:  Guillaume Brun; Thomas Spallek; Philippe Simier; Philippe Delavault
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 9.  ABA Metabolism and Homeostasis in Seed Dormancy and Germination.

Authors:  Naoto Sano; Annie Marion-Poll
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  The interaction between strigolactones and other plant hormones in the regulation of plant development.

Authors:  Xi Cheng; Carolien Ruyter-Spira; Harro Bouwmeester
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.