Literature DB >> 22858453

Outcomes of HeartWare Ventricular Assist System support in 141 patients: a single-centre experience.

Long Wu1, Yu-Guo Weng, Nian-Guo Dong, Thomas Krabatsch, Alexander Stepanenko, Ewald Hennig, Roland Hetzer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A third-generation ventricular assist device, the HeartWare Ventricular Assist System, has demonstrated its reliability and durability in animal models and clinical experience. However, studies of a large series of applications are still lacking. We evaluate the safety and efficacy of the HeartWare pump in 141 patients with end-stage heart failure at a single centre.
METHODS: A total of 141 patients (116 men and 25 women with a mean age of 52 years) in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV received implantation of the HeartWare Ventricular Assist System between August 2009 and April 2011 at the Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin. The outcomes were measured in terms of laboratory data, adverse events, NYHA functional class and survival during device support.
RESULTS: The HeartWare system provided an adequate haemodynamic support for patients both inside and outside the hospital. NYHA class improved to I-II. Organ function and pulmonary vascular resistance improved significantly. In this cohort of patients, 14 patients underwent heart transplantation, one had had the device explanted following myocardial recovery, one had changed to another assist device, 81 were on ongoing support and 44 died. The overall actuarial survival rates at 6 and 12 months were 70 and 67%, respectively, and the 3-, 6- and 12-month survival rates on a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support for bridge to transplantation patients were 82, 81 and 79%, respectively. Infection and bleeding were the main adverse events. Four patients underwent an LVAD exchange for pump thrombosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The HeartWare system provides a safe and effective circulatory support in a population with a wide range of body surface areas, with a satisfactory actuarial survival time and an improved quality of life. It can be used for univentricular or biventricular support, being implanted into the pericardial space with simplified surgical techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart failure; HeartWare; Ventricular assist device

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22858453     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pump thrombosis-A riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.

Authors:  Arie Blitz
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-09

2.  How to do it: tips and tricks of minimal-invasive HVAD® implantation-the lateral approach.

Authors:  Ezin Deniz; Anamika Chatterjee; Christina Feldmann; Jasmin S Hanke; Guenes Dogan; Dominik Berliner; Malakh L Shrestha; Axel Haverich; Jan D Schmitto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  How to cope with a temporarily aborted transplant program: solutions for a prolonged waiting period.

Authors:  Frédéric Vanden Eynden; Martine Antoine; Bachar El Oumeiri; Marie-Luce Chirade; Jean-Luc Vachiéry; Guido J Van Nooten
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-11

4.  Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Omar M Abu Saleh; John M Stulak; Mark P Wilhelm; Larry M Baddour; M Rizwan Sohail
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 5.  Durability of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ashleigh Xie; Kevin Phan; Tristan D Yan
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-11

6.  A retrospective evaluation of fondaparinux for confirmed or suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in left-ventricular-assist device patients.

Authors:  Scott T Benken; Nicholas Tillman; Suhuir Dajani; Aesha Shah; Toby Thomas
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 1.637

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.