Literature DB >> 22858278

Longitudinal outcome of isolated mitral repair in older patients: results from 14,604 procedures performed from 1991 to 2007.

Vinay Badhwar1, Eric D Peterson, Jeffrey P Jacobs, Xia He, J Matthew Brennan, Sean M O'Brien, Rachel S Dokholyan, Kristopher M George, Steven F Bolling, David M Shahian, Fredrick L Grover, Fred H Edwards, James S Gammie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mitral valve (MV) repair is performed with less frequency than MV replacement in older persons, with referral often delayed until symptoms are severe. Surgical practice in this population remains inconsistent in the absence of national MV repair outcomes. The goal of this study was to assess durability and longitudinal outcomes after isolated primary MV repair in patients aged 65 years or more.
METHODS: We linked clinical data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac surgery database (STS) to longitudinal claims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Between January 1991 and December 2007, we identified 14,604 isolated nonemergent primary MV repair operations in STS-CMS data. These were longitudinally examined for mortality, mitral reoperation, and readmissions for heart failure, bleeding, and stroke. Predictors of 5-year death after MV repair were identified using Cox proportional hazard modeling.
RESULTS: The study cohort had a mean age of 73.3±5.5 years, ejection fraction 54.0%±12.9%; 55.8% (8,148 of 14,604) were female; and 8.4% (1,233 of 14,604) were non-Caucasian. Operative mortality was 2.59% (378 of 14,604). Mean follow-up was 5.9±3.9 years (range, 1.0 to 18.0). Survival during follow-up was 74.9% (10,934 of 14,604). The number of observed events for mitral reoperation, heart failure, bleeding, and stroke were 552 of 14,604 (3.7%), 2,681 of 14,604 (18.4%), 1,051 of 14,604 (7.2%), and 1,131 of 14,604 (7.7%), respectively. The 10-year Kaplan-Meier event rates for mitral reoperation, heart failure, bleeding, and stroke were 6.2%, 30.1%, 15.3%, and 16.4%, respectively. The 10-year actuarial survival of 57.4% was equivalent to the matched US population.
CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing linked STS and CMS databases, we demonstrate that MV repair is a safe and durable long-term option for older patients. Survival restored to the normal population suggests repair may suppress the longitudinal impact of mitral regurgitation in the elderly and that the practice of delayed referral should be reevaluated. These data provide a contemporary longitudinal benchmark of MV repair outcomes.
Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22858278     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.05.105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  25 in total

1.  Single-centre experience of mitral valve surgery via right lateral mini-thoracotomy in octogenarians.

Authors:  Jan-Philipp Minol; Payam Akhyari; Udo Boeken; Hiroyuki Kamiya; Tobias Weinreich; Stephan Sixt; Hildegard Gramsch-Zabel; Artur Lichtenberg
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-11-29

2.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: a report from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; Michael J Blaha; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Rachel H Mackey; David J Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Dilip K Pandey; Nina P Paynter; Matthew J Reeves; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Atrial Fibrillation and Mitral Valve Prolapse: Time to Intervene?

Authors:  Michael A Borger; Moussa C Mansour; Robert A Levine
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Devices for mitral valve repair.

Authors:  Paolo Denti; Francesco Maisano; Ottavio Alfieri
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 5.  Echocardiographic assessment of mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kagiyama; Sirish Shrestha
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 1.314

6.  [Transcatheter mitral valve replacement: current status].

Authors:  J Vogelhuber; M Weber; J-M Sinning; G Nickenig
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.443

7.  Association of postoperative complications and outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Oliver K Jawitz; Brian C Gulack; J Matthew Brennan; Dylan P Thibault; Alice Wang; Sean M O'Brien; Jacob N Schroder; Jeffrey G Gaca; Peter K Smith
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2020-02-08       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 8.  Treatment of degenerative mitral regurgitation in elderly patients.

Authors:  Maurizio Taramasso; Oliver Gaemperli; Francesco Maisano
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 9.  Current Status of Catheter-Based Treatment of Mitral Valve Regurgitation.

Authors:  Mario Gössl; Robert S Farivar; Richard Bae; Paul Sorajja
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Interventional vs. surgical mitral valve therapy. Which technique for which patient?

Authors:  M Taramasso; N Buzzatti; G La Canna; A Colombo; O Alfieri; F Maisano
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.