Literature DB >> 22857910

A biomechanical comparison of 3 loop suture materials in a 6-strand flexor tendon repair technique.

Aaron W T Gan1, Puay Yong Neo, Min He, Andrew K T Yam, Alphonsus K S Chong, Shian Chao Tay.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The braided polyblend (FiberWire) suture is recognized for its superiority in tensile strength in flexor tendon repair. The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical performance of 3 loop-suture materials used in a locking 6-strand flexor tendon repair configuration: braided polyblend (FiberLoop 4-0), cable nylon (Supramid Extra II 4-0), and braided polyester (Tendo-Loop 4-0). We hypothesized that, using this technique, the braided polyblend suture would give superior tensile strength compared with the other 2 suture materials.
METHODS: We divided 30 fresh porcine flexor tendons transversely and repaired each with 1 of the 3 suture materials using a modified Lim-Tsai 6-strand suture technique. We loaded the repaired tendons to failure using a materials testing machine and collected data on the mechanism of failure, ultimate tensile strength, gap strength, and stiffness.
RESULTS: Failure mechanisms for the repaired specimens were as follows: the braided polyblend had 50% suture breakage and 50% suture pullout; the cable nylon had 100% suture breakage; and the braided polyester had 80% suture breakage and 20% suture pullout. Specimens repaired with the braided polyblend suture had the highest mean ultimate tensile strength (97 N; standard deviation, 22) and the highest mean gap force (35 N; standard deviation, 7).
CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the findings of previous studies showing superior strength of the braided polyblend suture. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We were able to achieve up to 124 N in ultimate tensile strength and 48 N of gap force with this suture in porcine tendons. This gives greater confidence in starting immediate controlled passive or active rehabilitation after repair of flexor tendon injuries.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22857910     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.06.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  7 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical comparison of double grasping repair versus cross-locked cruciate flexor tendon repair.

Authors:  C Liam Dwyer; D Dean Dominy; Timothy E Cooney; Richard Englund; Leonard Gordon; John D Lubahn
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-03

2.  A Biomechanical Study of a Novel Asymmetric 6-Strand Flexor Tendon Repair Using Porcine Tendons.

Authors:  Yoke Rung Wong; Shian Chao Tay
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-01-04

3.  CORR Insights®: Combined Administration of ASCs and BMP-12 Promotes an M2 Macrophage Phenotype and Enhances Tendon Healing.

Authors:  Amitabha Lahiri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Ligament bracing--augmented cruciate ligament sutures: biomechanical studies of a new treatment concept].

Authors:  M Heitmann; A Dratzidis; M Jagodzinski; P Wohlmuth; C Hurschler; K Püschel; A Giannakos; A Preiss; K-H Frosch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  A Biomechanical Analysis of the Interlock Suture and a Modified Kessler-Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Suture.

Authors:  Wenfeng Yang; Dan Qiao; Yuanfei Ren; Yvjin Dong; Yaohua Shang; Tiehui Zhang
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  A Modified Flexor Tendon Suture Technique Combining Kessler and Loop Lock Flexor Tendon Sutures.

Authors:  Wenfeng Yang; Jvtao Li; Yuewen Su; Wu Liang; Yuanfei Ren; Yvjin Dong; Yaohua Shang; Sheng Zhong; Lianchun Xu; Tiehui Zhang
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  The effect of modified locking methods and suture materials on Zone II flexor tendon repair-An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Susumu Yoneda; Hirotaka Okubo; Stephen W Linderman; Nozomu Kusano; Matthew J Silva; Stavros Thomopoulos; Fuminori Kanaya; Richard H Gelberman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.