OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency and risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre cohort study. SETTING: Fourteen NHS hospitals in England, April to September 2009. POPULATION: Women who underwent caesarean section at participating hospitals during designated study periods. METHODS: Infections that met standard case definitions were identified through active follow up by healthcare staff during the hospital stay, on return to hospital, during midwife home visits and through self-completed patient questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Surgical site infection within 30 days of operation. RESULTS: Altogether, 9.6% (394/4107) of women in the study developed a postsurgical infection following caesarean section with 0.6% (23/4107) readmitted for treatment of the infection. Being overweight (body mass index [BMI] 25-30 kg/m(2) odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.2-2.2) or obese (BMI 30-35 kg/m(2) OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.7-3.4; BMI > 35 kg/m(2) OR 3.7, 95% CI 2.6-5.2) were major independent risk factors for infection (compared with BMI 18.5-25 kg/m(2)). There was a suggestion that younger women, and operations performed by associate specialist and staff grade surgeons had a greater odds of developing surgical site infection with OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.4 (<20 years versus 25-30 years), and OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.4 (versus consultants), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified high rates of postsurgical infection following caesarean section. Given the number of women delivering by caesarean section in the UK, substantial costs will be incurred as a result of these infections. Prevention of these infections should be a clinical and public health priority.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency and risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section. DESIGN: Prospective multicentre cohort study. SETTING: Fourteen NHS hospitals in England, April to September 2009. POPULATION: Women who underwent caesarean section at participating hospitals during designated study periods. METHODS: Infections that met standard case definitions were identified through active follow up by healthcare staff during the hospital stay, on return to hospital, during midwife home visits and through self-completed patient questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Surgical site infection within 30 days of operation. RESULTS: Altogether, 9.6% (394/4107) of women in the study developed a postsurgical infection following caesarean section with 0.6% (23/4107) readmitted for treatment of the infection. Being overweight (body mass index [BMI] 25-30 kg/m(2) odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.2-2.2) or obese (BMI 30-35 kg/m(2) OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.7-3.4; BMI > 35 kg/m(2) OR 3.7, 95% CI 2.6-5.2) were major independent risk factors for infection (compared with BMI 18.5-25 kg/m(2)). There was a suggestion that younger women, and operations performed by associate specialist and staff grade surgeons had a greater odds of developing surgical site infection with OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.4 (<20 years versus 25-30 years), and OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.0-2.4 (versus consultants), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified high rates of postsurgical infection following caesarean section. Given the number of women delivering by caesarean section in the UK, substantial costs will be incurred as a result of these infections. Prevention of these infections should be a clinical and public health priority.
Authors: Methodius G Tuuli; Lucy Liu; Ryan E Longman; Anthony O Odibo; George A Macones; Alison G Cahill Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Jamie R Robinson; Robert J Carroll; Lisa Bastarache; Qingxia Chen; Zongyang Mou; Wei-Qi Wei; John J Connolly; Frank Mentch; Patrick Sleiman; Paul K Crane; Scott J Hebbring; Ian B Stanaway; David R Crosslin; Adam S Gordon; Elisabeth A Rosenthal; David Carrell; M Geoffrey Hayes; Wei Wei; Lynn Petukhova; Bahram Namjou; Ge Zhang; Maya S Safarova; Nephi A Walton; Christopher Still; Erwin P Bottinger; Ruth J F Loos; Shawn N Murphy; Gretchen P Jackson; Iftikhar J Kullo; Hakon Hakonarson; Gail P Jarvik; Eric B Larson; Chunhua Weng; Dan M Roden; Joshua C Denny Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Kim A Boggess; Alan Tita; Victoria Jauk; George Saade; Sherri Longo; Erin A S Clark; Sean Esplin; Kristin Cleary; Ronald Wapner; Kelli Letson; Michelle Owens; Sean Blackwell; Carmen Beamon; Jeffrey M Szychowski; William Andrews Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Elizabeth M Coviello; Sara N Iqbal; Katherine L Grantz; Chun-Chih Huang; Helain J Landy; Uma M Reddy Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-09-28 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Amy M Valent; Chris DeArmond; Judy M Houston; Srinidhi Reddy; Heather R Masters; Alison Gold; Michael Boldt; Emily DeFranco; Arthur T Evans; Carri R Warshak Journal: JAMA Date: 2017-09-19 Impact factor: 56.272