Literature DB >> 2285660

Primary versus secondary intraorbital implants.

T J Smit1, L Koornneef, M P Mourits, E Groet, A J Otto.   

Abstract

To compare the results of primary and secondary intraorbital implants after enucleation, we retrospectively studied the surgical outcomes of 114 patients. In 44 patients the implant was inserted immediately after enucleation and in the remaining 70 patients the implant was inserted at a later date. To achieve a satisfactory cosmetic result, additional procedures were needed in 11% of the patients with a primary implant and in 49% of those with a secondary implant. The insertion of an implant at the time of enucleation has distinct advantages over the insertion of the implant at a later date.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2285660     DOI: 10.1097/00002341-199006000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0740-9303            Impact factor:   1.746


  2 in total

1.  Ocular prostheses.

Authors:  B Leatherbarrow; J Kwartz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-05-18

Review 2.  Survey on the management of orbital and intraocular tumors among oculofacial surgeons in the Asia-Pacific region.

Authors:  Priscilla Xinhui Wang; Victor Teck Chang Koh; Katherine Lun; Gangadhara Sundar
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.031

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.