Literature DB >> 22855890

Predicting 12-month mortality for peritoneal dialysis patients using the "surprise" question.

Wing-Fai Pang1, Bonnie Ching-Ha Kwan, Kai-Ming Chow, Chi-Bon Leung, Philip Kam-Tao Li, Cheuk-Chun Szeto.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies in hemodialysis patients suggest that the "surprise" question can help to identify a group of patients with a high mortality risk who should receive priority for palliative care interventions. However, the same instrument has not been tested in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients.
METHOD: We studied 367 prevalent PD patients from a single dialysis center. Three clinicians independently answered the "surprise" question (Would I be surprised if this patient died within the next 12 months?) according to their clinical impression of the individual patient. Patients are then classified into "yes" (yes, surprised) and "no" (no, not surprised) groups. All patients were followed for 12 months.
RESULTS: In this cohort, 109 patients (29.7%) were allocated to the "no" group, and 258 (70.3%), to the "yes" group. Patients in the "no" group were older and had high prevalences of pre-existing ischemic heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral vascular disease. The "no" group had a higher score on the Charlson comorbidity index and a higher malnutrition-inflammation score. At 12 months, 44 patients had died. Mortality was 24.8% in the "no" group and 6.6% in the "yes" group. Multivariate analysis showed that an opinion of "Not surprised if dies in the next 12 months" was an independent predictor of 12-month mortality, with an associated 3.594 excess mortality risk (95% confidence interval: 1.411 to 9.151; p = 0.007). The positive predictive value of this opinion was 24.8%, and its negative predictive value was 93.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: The "surprise" question has the potential to help identify a group of PD patients with high short-term mortality. Its use may contribute to a decision to refer PD patients for early palliative care assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22855890      PMCID: PMC3598271          DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  22 in total

1.  Clinical practice guideline on shared decision-making in the appropriate initiation of and withdrawal from dialysis. The Renal Physicians Association and the American Society of Nephrology.

Authors:  John H Galla
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Improving Care Through the End of Life: launching a primary care clinic-based program.

Authors:  M Pattison; A L Romer
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Asking the right question.

Authors:  R Della Penna
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Assessing care of vulnerable elders: ACOVE project overview.

Authors:  N S Wenger; P G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-10-16       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Dialysis: when to start or when to stop?

Authors:  Sean Fenwick; Rema Saxena; Janice M Harper
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.992

6.  Urinary creatinine excretion and lean body mass.

Authors:  G B Forbes; G J Bruining
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  A malnutrition-inflammation score is correlated with morbidity and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  K Kalantar-Zadeh; J D Kopple; G Block; M H Humphreys
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Neighborhood location, rurality, geography, and outcomes of peritoneal dialysis patients in the United States.

Authors:  Rajnish Mehrotra; Kenneth Story; Steven Guest; Michelle Fedunyszyn
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Cross-sectional assessment of weekly urea and creatinine clearances in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  K D Nolph; H L Moore; Z J Twardowski; R Khanna; B Prowant; M Meyer; L Ponferrada
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  1992 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  Choosing not to dialyse: evaluation of planned non-dialytic management in a cohort of patients with end-stage renal failure.

Authors:  Carolyn Smith; Maria Da Silva-Gane; Shahid Chandna; Paul Warwicker; Roger Greenwood; Ken Farrington
Journal:  Nephron Clin Pract       Date:  2003
View more
  19 in total

1.  Reliability and Utility of the Surprise Question in CKD Stages 4 to 5.

Authors:  Andrei D Javier; Rocio Figueroa; Edward D Siew; Huzaifah Salat; Jennifer Morse; Thomas G Stewart; Rakesh Malhotra; Manisha Jhamb; Jane O Schell; Cesar Y Cardona; Cathy A Maxwell; T Alp Ikizler; Khaled Abdel-Kader
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  The Surprise Question as a Prognostic Tool #360.

Authors:  Kate S Jennings; Sean Marks; Hillary D Lum
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Prognostic stratification in older adults commencing dialysis.

Authors:  Katharine L Cheung; Maria E Montez-Rath; Glenn M Chertow; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Vyjeyanthi S Periyakoil; Manjula Kurella Tamura
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 6.053

4.  The "Surprise Question" Asked of Emergency Physicians May Predict 12-Month Mortality among Older Emergency Department Patients.

Authors:  Kei Ouchi; Guru Jambaulikar; Naomi R George; Wanlu Xu; Ziad Obermeyer; Emily L Aaronson; Jeremiah D Schuur; Mara A Schonberg; James A Tulsky; Susan D Block
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Prioritizing Primary Care Patients for a Communication Intervention Using the "Surprise Question": a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Joshua R Lakin; Margaret G Robinson; Ziad Obermeyer; Brian W Powers; Susan D Block; Rebecca Cunningham; Joseph M Tumblin; Christine Vogeli; Rachelle E Bernacki
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  The Surprise Question Can Be Used to Identify Heart Failure Patients in the Emergency Department Who Would Benefit From Palliative Care.

Authors:  Emily L Aaronson; Naomi George; Kei Ouchi; Hui Zheng; Jason Bowman; Derek Monette; Juliet Jacobsen; Vicki Jackson
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 7.  The "surprise question" for predicting death in seriously ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  James Downar; Russell Goldman; Ruxandra Pinto; Marina Englesakis; Neill K J Adhikari
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Utility of the "Surprise" Question in Predicting Survival among Older Patients with Acute Surgical Conditions.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Lilley; Sean A Gemunden; Gentian Kristo; Navin Changoor; John W Scott; Elizabeth Rickerson; Naomi Shimizu; Ali Salim; Zara Cooper
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  The Surprise Question and Self-Rated Health Are Useful Screens for Frailty and Disability in Older Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Nicolas A Baddour; Cassianne Robinson-Cohen; Loren Lipworth; Aihua Bian; Thomas G Stewart; Manisha Jhamb; Edward D Siew; Khaled Abdel-Kader
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 2.947

10.  Would You Be Surprised If This Patient Died This Year? Advance Care Planning in Substance Use Disorders.

Authors:  Michelle J Fleshner; Amy J Kennedy; Peter J Veldkamp; Julie W Childers
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.