Literature DB >> 22855612

Ontogeny of aerodynamics in mallards: comparative performance and developmental implications.

Terry R Dial1, Ashley M Heers, Bret W Tobalske.   

Abstract

Wing morphology correlates with flight performance and ecology among adult birds, yet the impact of wing development on aerodynamic capacity is not well understood. Recent work using chukar partridge (Alectoris chukar), a precocial flier, indicates that peak coefficients of lift and drag (C(L) and C(D)) and lift-to-drag ratio (C(L):C(D)) increase throughout ontogeny and that these patterns correspond with changes in feather microstructure. To begin to place these results in a comparative context that includes variation in life-history strategy, we used a propeller and force-plate model to study aerodynamic force production across a developmental series of the altricial-flying mallard (Anas platyrhynchos). We observed the same trend in mallards as reported for chukar in that coefficients of vertical (C(V)) and horizontal force (C(H)) and C(V):C(H) ratio increased with age, and that measures of gross-wing morphology (aspect ratio, camber and porosity) in mallards did not account for intraspecific trends in force production. Rather, feather microstructure (feather unfurling, rachis width, feather asymmetry and barbule overlap) all were positively correlated with peak C(V):C(H). Throughout ontogeny, mallard primary feathers became stiffer and less transmissive to air at both macroscale (between individual feathers) and microscale (between barbs/barbules/barbicels) levels. Differences between species were manifest primarily as heterochrony of aerodynamic force development. Chukar wings generated measurable aerodynamic forces early (<8 days), and improved gradually throughout a 100 day ontogenetic period. Mallard wings exhibited delayed aerodynamic force production until just prior to fledging (day 60), and showed dramatic improvement within a condensed 2-week period. These differences in timing may be related to mechanisms of escape used by juveniles, with mallards swimming to safety and chukar flap-running up slopes to take refuge. Future comparative work should test whether the need for early onset of aerodynamic force production in the chukar, compared with delayed, but rapid, change in the mallard wing, leads to a limited repertoire of flight behavior in adult chukar compared with mallards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22855612     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.062018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  9 in total

1.  Hummingbird wing efficacy depends on aspect ratio and compares with helicopter rotors.

Authors:  Jan W Kruyt; Elsa M Quicazán-Rubio; GertJan F van Heijst; Douglas L Altshuler; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Radial porosity profiles: a new bone histological method for comparative developmental analysis of diametric limb bone growth.

Authors:  Edina Prondvai; Adam T Kocsis; Anick Abourachid; Dominique Adriaens; Pascal Godefroit; Dong-Yu Hu; Richard J Butler
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 3.653

3.  Sexual Dimorphism and Population Differences in Structural Properties of Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica) Wing and Tail Feathers.

Authors:  Péter L Pap; Gergely Osváth; José Miguel Aparicio; Lőrinc Bărbos; Piotr Matyjasiak; Diego Rubolini; Nicola Saino; Csongor I Vágási; Orsolya Vincze; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Flapping before Flight: High Resolution, Three-Dimensional Skeletal Kinematics of Wings and Legs during Avian Development.

Authors:  Ashley M Heers; David B Baier; Brandon E Jackson; Kenneth P Dial
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The influence of flight style on the aerodynamic properties of avian wings as fixed lifting surfaces.

Authors:  John J Lees; Grigorios Dimitriadis; Robert L Nudds
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Intraskeletal histovariability, allometric growth patterns, and their functional implications in bird-like dinosaurs.

Authors:  Edina Prondvai; Pascal Godefroit; Dominique Adriaens; Dong-Yu Hu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Building a Bird: Musculoskeletal Modeling and Simulation of Wing-Assisted Incline Running During Avian Ontogeny.

Authors:  Ashley M Heers; Jeffery W Rankin; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-10-23

8.  Differences in hindlimb morphology of ducks and chickens: effects of domestication and selection.

Authors:  Brendan M Duggan; Paul M Hocking; Tobias Schwarz; Dylan N Clements
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Physical Health Problems and Environmental Challenges Influence Balancing Behaviour in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Stephanie LeBlanc; Bret Tobalske; Margaret Quinton; Dwight Springthorpe; Bill Szkotnicki; Hanno Wuerbel; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.