| Literature DB >> 22855301 |
Yasuko Kobayashi1, Akira Aizawa, Takumi Takizawa, Chikage Yoshizawa, Hiromi Horiguchi, Yuka Ikeuchi, Satoko Kakegawa, Toshio Watanabe, Kenichi Maruyama, Akihiro Morikawa, Izuho Hatada, Hirokazu Arakawa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: DNA methylation of gene promoters is associated with transcriptional inactivation. Changes in DNA methylation can lead to differences in gene expression levels and thereby influence disease development. We hypothesized that epigenetics underlies the pathogenesis of minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22855301 PMCID: PMC3491205 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-012-2248-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Nephrol ISSN: 0931-041X Impact factor: 3.714
Characteristics of patients with minimal change nephrotic syndrome at sampling whose DNA was isolated for methylation analysis
| Patient no. | Sex | Age at onset | Total follow-up perioda (months) | Frequent relapser | Biopsy | Sampling age at relapse | Relapse times at sampling | Intervalsb (weeks) | PSL at relapse (mg/day) | PLS at remission (mg/day) | IS at relapse (mg/day) | IS at remission (mg/day) | CD14+ ( | RO− ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 10y4m | 78 | Yes | MC | 13y0m | 3rd | 5 | 40 | 10 | 0 | 0 | Taken | Taken |
| 2 | M | 5y4m | 35 | Yes | MC | 6y0m | 3rd | 16 | 0 | 35 | 0 | CyA90 | Taken | Taken |
| 3 | M | 5y11m | 186 | Yes | MC | 18y6m | 9th | 23 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 0 | Taken | Taken |
| 4 | M | 7y3m | 188 | Yes | MC | 19y10m | 13th | 23 | 60 | 5 | 0 | 0 | Taken | Taken |
| 5 | M | 9y9m | 109 | Yes | ND | 11y7m | 4th | 12 | 0 | 0 | CyA180 | CyA160 | Taken | NT |
| 6 | M | 11y11m | 61 | Yes | ND | 12y5m | 4th | 71 | 0 | 20 | MZV125 | MZV 75 | Taken | NT |
| Mean | 8y4m | 109.5 | 13y5m | 6th | 25 |
PSL, prednisolone IS, immunosuppressant; M, Male; y, years; m, months; MC, minimal change; ND, not done; CyA, cyclosporin A; MZB, mizoribine; NT, not taken
aFollow-up period till June 2011
bIntervals of sampling between relapse and remission
Characteristics of patients with minimal change nephrotic syndrome at sampling who underwent gene expression analysis
| Patient no. | Sex | Age at onset | Total follow-up perioda (months) | Frequent relapser | Biopsy | Sampling age at relapse | Relapse times at sampling (n) | Intervalsb (weeks) | PSL at relapse (mg/day) | PLS at remission (mg/day) | IS at relapse (mg/day) | IS at remission (mg/day) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | M | 8y4m | 121 | Yes | MC | 11y11m | 8 | 1 | 10 | 60 | MZV150 | MZV150 |
| 8 | M | 10y4m | 78 | Yes | MC | 13y8m | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | M | 2y5m | 154 | Yes | MC | 17y9m | 20 | 3 | 60 | 40 | MZV150 | MZV150 |
| 10 | F | 4y3m | 44 | No | ND | 6y2m | 2 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 11 | F | 4y10m | 130 | Yes | ND | 15y0m | 8 | 1 | 0 | 30 | 0 | 0 |
| 12 | F | 10y3m | 36 | Yes | ND | 14y0m | 4 | 13 | 0 | 20ADT | CyA50 | CyA50 |
| 13 | F | 4y7m | 37 | Yes | MC | 6y7m | 7 | 8 | 0 | 0 | CyA80 | CyA80 |
| Mean | 6y5m | 85.7 | 12y1m | 7.7 | 7.7 |
F, Female
aFollow-up period till June 2011
bIntervals of sampling between relapse and remission
Fig. 1a, b Scatter plots of the signals obtained for each probe in monocytes (a) and naive T helper cells (b). Log [(HpaII intensity) Remission/(HpaII intensity) Relapse] values are plotted on the x-axis and log[(MspI intensity) Remission/(MspI intensity) Relapse] values are plotted on the y-axis. The threshold values are determined at log5 of the horizontal distance from the center of the mass and at log5 of the horizontal distance to the regression line of the plots in accordance with the original MIAMI method of Hatada et al. [17, 18]. Points located on the right side and beyond the distance of these lines are judged to be more highly methylated; those located to the left are judged to be significantly less methylated in the relapse samples compared with the remission samples. The three gene probes were found to be less methylated in relapse samples than in remission samples in naive T helper cells (b), whereas no significant signal was detected in monocytes (a). c Distance distributions of all probes are from the regression line. Each dot indicates the log distance of the indicated probes plotted out to the 90th percentile of signals from the regression line. These distributions were significantly different (P = 0.0073) between monocytes and naive T helper cells (Th0s)
Fig. 4Expression of GATA2 and PBX4 genes in Th0s from patients with minimal change nephrotic syndrome at relapse and in remission. Nyctalopin (NYX) was not detected in Th0s. a GATA2 expression was low and did not change significantly (P = 0.0781) between relapse and remission. b PBX4 expression did not differ significantly (P = 0. 2188) between relapse and remission
Fig. 2Gene maps of GATA2 (a), PBX4 (b), and NYX (c), including the position of the probes used in the MIAMI analysis. The number of CpG (covalent addition of a methyl group to a cytosine residue followed by a guanine) islands and the CG percentages throughout the genomic regions of these genes are also indicated. GATA binding protein 2 (GATA2) maps to chromosome (Ch) 3 q21.3, pre-B-cell leukemia homeobox 4 (PBX4) maps to Ch19 p12, and nyctalopin (NYX) maps to Ch X p11.4. Filled squares indicate the position of the probes with significant changes to the methylation status in Th0s. Probe A_17_P02574948 for GATA2 recognizes the region 3.6 kb upstream of the transcription start site of this gene, which is within a CpG island. The probe A_17_P10909964 sequence in PBX4 is located within the first intron of this gene, and probe A_17_P11717994 for NYX maps to the region just upstream of the transcription start site
Signal intensity ratio in HpaII-treated samples for the indicated gene probes
| Cell type | Gene | Probe | Aa | Assessedb |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Naive T cells |
| A_17_P02574948 | 0.167722527 | −1 |
|
| A_17_P10909964 | 0.174326395 | −1 | |
|
| A_17_P11717994 | 0.151913072 | −1 | |
| Monocytes |
| A_17_P02574948 | 2.523381325 | 0 |
aSignal intensity ratio calculated by [(HpaII intensity) Remission/(HpaII intensity) Relapse] indicating an unmethylated intensity ratio for remission vs. relapse
b−1, Signal intensity ratio at this probe is located further left than the threshold lines indicating significantly lower methylation in the relapse samples than in the remission samples; 0, signal intensity ratio at this probe is located within the threshold lines
Fig. 3DNA methylation ratio analysis by bisulfite-pyrosequencing. To validate the MIAMI data, methylation ratios for CpGs in the closest CCGG HpaII recognition sites on both the 5′ (UP) and 3′ (DN) side of the probe sequences were determined using bisulfite-pyrosequencing (a). These ratios were lower in minimal change nephrotic syndrome (MCNS) relapse (Rel) samples than in remission (Rem) samples at all sites for the three probes in Th0s (b). The methylation ratios for the GATA2 probe A_17_P02574948 in monocytes (c) were higher in Rel than in Rem at both sides of the probe. The methylation pattern at every CpG site determined using bisulfite-pyrosequencing accorded well with the MIAMI results (Table 3), which indicate an unmethylated intensity ratio between relapse and remission