Literature DB >> 22855184

Ultrasound-assisted endocavitary HDR-Ir(192) brachytherapy for unresectable locally advanced uterine cervix carcinoma: retrospective analysis focusing the efficacy and tolerability.

Georgios V Koukourakis1, Anthoula Miliadou, Ioannis Tsalafoutas, Myrsini G Gkeli, Elisavet Geli, Anastasia Sotiropoulou-Lontou.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of uterine cavity's ultrasound to final selected length of intracavitary tandem. The efficacy and tolerability of external beam radiation plus HDR-Ir(192) brachytherapy in our cohort of patients were also estimated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 48 women with locally advanced unresectable uterine cervix carcinoma were treated by HDR-Ir(192) endocavitary brachytherapy between January 2007 and January 2009. The median age was 63 (range 38-74). The distribution according to Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system was as follows: Stage IIB, 54.16 %; IIIA, 10.4 %; IIIB, 27.0 %; and IVA, 8.3 %. HDR intracavitary brachytherapy was given weekly, beginning at the last week of whole pelvis irradiation, with a dose of 7 Gy to point A for three to four fractions. The median overall treatment time was 50 days (range 42-73 days). The median follow-up time was 2.7 years (range 3 months to 4.9 years). Multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: The complete remission rate after radiotherapy was 93.75 % (45/48). The 5-year actuarial major complication rates (Grade 3 or above) were 6.3 % overall (2.1 % proctitis, 2.1 % cystitis and 2.1 % enteritis). Estimation of the length of uterine cavity by ultrasound helped decisively in the proper placement of the intrauterine tandem inserted.
CONCLUSIONS: Prior knowledge of the length of uterine cavity can facilitate the decisions regarding the proper insertion length of the tandem. Results of cervical cancer treatment with external beam radiation and HDR intracavitary brachytherapy in our hospital are encouraging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22855184     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-012-0901-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  22 in total

1.  Radiation therapy morbidity in carcinoma of the uterine cervix: dosimetric and clinical correlation.

Authors:  C A Perez; P W Grigsby; M A Lockett; K S Chao; J Williamson
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  High-dose-rate brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix: high tech or high risk?

Authors:  P J Eifel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Literature analysis of high dose rate brachytherapy fractionation schedules in the treatment of cervical cancer: is there an optimal fractionation schedule?

Authors:  D G Petereit; R Pearcey
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  High dose rate afterloading intracavitary therapy in carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  T N Roman; L Souhami; C R Freeman; C Pla; M D Evans; E B Podgorsak; K Mendelew
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  High-dose-rate remote afterloading intracavitary radiation therapy for cancer of the uterine cervix. A 20-year experience.

Authors:  T Arai; T Nakano; S Morita; K Sakashita; Y K Nakamura; K Fukuhisa
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  High-dose-rate versus low-dose-rate brachytherapy in the treatment of cervical cancer: analysis of tumor recurrence--the University of Wisconsin experience.

Authors:  D G Petereit; J N Sarkaria; D M Potter; J C Schink
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Carcinoma of the cervix: analysis of complications after primary external beam radiation and Ir-192 HDR brachytherapy.

Authors:  K S Kapp; G F Stuecklschweiger; D S Kapp; J Poschauko; H Pickel; A Hackl
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  EORTC Late Effects Working Group. Late effects toxicity scoring: the SOMA scale.

Authors:  J J Pavy; J Denekamp; J Letschert; B Littbrand; F Mornex; J Bernier; D Gonzales-Gonzales; J C Horiot; M Bolla; H Bartelink
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.280

9.  Radiotherapy for cervical cancer with high-dose rate brachytherapy correlation between tumor size, dose and failure.

Authors:  H Ito; S Kutuki; I Nishiguchi; N Shigematsu; T Kuribayashi; M Uematsu; T Nakayama; W J Ka; K Takemasa; Y Ando
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.280

10.  Dose-tumor response of carcinoma of cervix: an analysis of 594 patients treated by radiotherapy.

Authors:  D Choy; L C Wong; J Sham; H Y Ngan; H K Ma
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.