I S L Liem1, C Kammerlander, N Suhm, S L Kates, M Blauth. 1. Department of Trauma Surgery and Sports Medicine, Tyrolean Geriatric Fracture Center, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: A variety of multidisciplinary treatment models have been described to improve outcome after osteoporotic hip fractures. There is a tendency toward better outcomes after implementation of the most sophisticated model with a shared leadership for orthopedic surgeons and geriatricians; the Geriatric Fracture Center. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the use of outcome parameters in published literature on the Geriatric Fracture Center evaluation studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed using Medline and the Cochrane Library to identify Geriatric Fracture Center evaluation studies. The outcome parameters used in the included studies were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 16 outcome parameters were used in 11 studies to evaluate patient outcome in 8 different Geriatric Fracture Centers. Two of these outcome parameters are patient-reported outcome measures and 14 outcome parameters were objective measures. CONCLUSION: In-hospital mortality, length of stay, time to surgery, place of residence and complication rate are the most frequently used outcome parameters. The patient-reported outcomes included activities of daily living and mobility scores. There is a need for generally agreed upon outcome measures to facilitate comparison of different care models.
INTRODUCTION: A variety of multidisciplinary treatment models have been described to improve outcome after osteoporotic hip fractures. There is a tendency toward better outcomes after implementation of the most sophisticated model with a shared leadership for orthopedic surgeons and geriatricians; the Geriatric Fracture Center. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the use of outcome parameters in published literature on the Geriatric Fracture Center evaluation studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was performed using Medline and the Cochrane Library to identify Geriatric Fracture Center evaluation studies. The outcome parameters used in the included studies were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 16 outcome parameters were used in 11 studies to evaluate patient outcome in 8 different Geriatric Fracture Centers. Two of these outcome parameters are patient-reported outcome measures and 14 outcome parameters were objective measures. CONCLUSION: In-hospital mortality, length of stay, time to surgery, place of residence and complication rate are the most frequently used outcome parameters. The patient-reported outcomes included activities of daily living and mobility scores. There is a need for generally agreed upon outcome measures to facilitate comparison of different care models.
Authors: Peter Dovjak; Bernhard Iglseder; Peter Mikosch; Markus Gosch; Ernst Müller; Georg Pinter; Katharina Pils; Inge Gerstofer; Heinrich Thaler; Michaela Zmaritz; Monique Weissenberger-Leduc; Walter Müller Journal: Wien Med Wochenschr Date: 2013-08-15
Authors: Cristina González de Villaumbrosia; Pilar Sáez López; Isaac Martín de Diego; Carmen Lancho Martín; Marina Cuesta Santa Teresa; Teresa Alarcón; Cristina Ojeda Thies; Rocío Queipo Matas; Juan Ignacio González-Montalvo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Charlotte Stenqvist; Christian Medom Madsen; Troels Riis; Henrik Løvendahl Jørgensen; Benn Rønnow Duus; Jes Bruun Lauritzen; Susanne van der Mark Journal: Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil Date: 2016-03-02
Authors: Bastiaan Van Grootven; Lynn McNicoll; Daniel A Mendelson; Susan M Friedman; Katleen Fagard; Koen Milisen; Johan Flamaing; Mieke Deschodt Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-03-16 Impact factor: 2.692